Re: browsers & standards

JRS: In article <6sGdnYA0xoJ9jenenZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com>, dated
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:33:21, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript, Randy Webb
<HikksNotAtHome@aol.com> posted :
>Dr John Stockton said the following on 11/8/2005 10:42 AM:
>
>> JRS: In article <JsGdncVXQeJUR_LenZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com>, dated
>> Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:55:15, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript, Randy Webb
>> <HikksNotAtHome@aol.com> posted :
>>
>>>Dr John Stockton said the following on 11/7/2005 8:48 AM:

>>>>One may not be able to do object/feature detection.
>>>
>>>Example of not being able to object/feature detect?
>>
>>
>> It was given in the paragraph "It cannot ...". Please read and
>> *understand* an article in full before starting to reply.
>
>I would, if you would post an argument that makes a half an ounce of
>sense John.

Your experience is finite.

Programmed feature detection can be used in code.

It can only be used in code.

That's what you've failed to recognise; there's a world outside your
coder's cubicle.
 

-- 
© John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ???@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v4.00   MIME. ©
 Web  <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
     Check boilerplate spelling -- error is a public sign of incompetence.
    Never fully trust an article from a poster who gives no full real name.