Re: +n- Flaw in IE

VK wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>>VK wrote:
>>
>>>UTF-8 is the current standard encoding for Unicode characters.
>>
>>Do you have any source for this claim?
>
>
> World Wide Web (starting from google.com and further until you get
> tired to browse).
>
> What are your sources for an opposite claim?
>

I have asked you a serious question, and this is not the reply I was
hoping for.
How can I possibly give a source for the non-existance of such a
standard?? You make the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.

Although not a good source, but when windows programs are specifying
Unicode as an output format, they usually mean the UTF-16 (Little
Endian) encoding.

Anyway I am not aware of a a claim that UTF-8 is the standard encoding
for Unicode characters.
So please show me a source, or admit that you have made a mistake.

Robert.
Received on Tue Jan 17 17:13:59 2006