Re: +n- Flaw in IE

Robert wrote:
> I have asked you a serious question, and this is not the reply I was
> hoping for.
> How can I possibly give a source for the non-existance of such a
> standard?? You make the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.

OK, here a couple of more claims:
1) Internet Explorer is up to date is the most widely used browser.
2) CGI is the most widely used underlaying interchange format for HTTP
3) All people are mortal.

I can give you a bunch of statements like this, and please don't ask
from me a document signed by UN Council to prove it. If you don't
believe me, then don't. Sorry if I'm sounding irritated by I just hate
then you say some common knowledge fact and right away they are asking
from you the Big Final Letter Of Prove for it (besides it is unclear
who's supposed to be the issuer of such Letter: W3C, UN Council,
Congress, Lord Himself ?)

> Although not a good source, but when windows programs are specifying
> Unicode as an output format, they usually mean the UTF-16 (Little
> Endian) encoding.

We are talking about *World Wide Web* and browsers and JavaScript. In
your own applications you can use UTF-21 (after you make it up first)
if you want to, but for WWW please be so kind to serve UTF-8 or use
your national encoding.
Received on Tue Jan 17 17:14:01 2006