Re: +n- Flaw in IE

VK wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>>I have asked you a serious question, and this is not the reply I was
>>hoping for.
>>How can I possibly give a source for the non-existance of such a
>>standard?? You make the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.
>
>
> OK, here a couple of more claims:
> 1) Internet Explorer is up to date is the most widely used browser.
> 2) CGI is the most widely used underlaying interchange format for HTTP
> 3) All people are mortal.

Besides that 2 is obviously wrong I'm sure that I could find a source
that supports the claim that Internet Explorer is the most widely used
browser.

All I ask you to do is find *ANY* source that your claim "UTF-8 is the
current standard encoding for Unicode characters".
I don't understand why you get this defensive about it. If it is so
obviously true then it must be easy for you to supply some source.

Now you already changed this claim to only those having to do with WWW.
But still..... have you even considered that there are languages where
UTF-16 files are smaller than those encoded in UTF-8?
Have you seen the list of Unicode encodings in the firefox Unicode submenu?
Received on Tue Jan 17 17:14:15 2006