Re: Check null or 0

VK wrote:
> Jonas Raoni wrote:
>>I saw a lot of people criticizing you here, I thought they just hated
>>you, but after reading this message I can see they are totally right
>>hahaha ;]
>
> Oh boy, did we get hurt? :-( ;-)

Hahahaha, no! We'll never get hurt, this isn't an arena, but a place to
spend some free time, I don't take anything personally ;]

Even disliking such unuseful discussions, I can't resist to my agressive
instinct, so if you can, stop this thread by not answering, it's already
over, the question got an answer =]

> So what the exact reason of *your* hate is? That I explained what did
> forecast+=+f[i].value||0;
> do and mean?

Yeah, that's the reason, explaining how the script works looks idiot for
me, I explain only if the person asks for explanation.

> It's hard to believe, I know, but it is not so obvious at all to an
> average user. Plus some people may prefer to use the conventional
> isNaN() check so I thought necessary to mention it.

You're right, but explaining the script is a kind of insult for the
idiot people like me haha. I assume everybody has a nice knowledge about
the language, so nothing needs explanation.

-- 
Jonas Raoni Soares Silva
http://www.jsfromhell.com