Re: (spam)secure mailform

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

> R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>>What makes you think you NEED this level of security, anyway? What are
>>>you doing which leads you to suspect you'd have a problem with abuse of
>>>the form?
>>
>>
>> Probably <http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Ablog%20spam>
>>
>> --
>> <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
>> Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com
>>
>
> So? This doesn't answer my question. This just talks about blog spam -
> something entirely different.
>
> I repeat - what makes you think you NEED this level of security? What are
> you doing which leads you to suspect you'd have a problem with abuse of
> the form?
>
he want's to avoid *any* spamming, he wants to protect themselves from all
and any emails that don't belong there in their system, which is great I
think.

What concersn the 100% security you advertise earlier, there is no way of
making webapps 100% secure and avoid *all* misuse. If you still claim so I
guess you are in for a Nobel price soon. It's just software after all...

-- 
http://www.kolumbus.fi/bob.smith