Re: (spam)secure mailform

Bob Smith wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>
>>R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
>>
>>>Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>What makes you think you NEED this level of security, anyway? What are
>>>>you doing which leads you to suspect you'd have a problem with abuse of
>>>>the form?
>>>
>>>
>>> Probably <http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Ablog%20spam>
>>>
>>>--
>>> <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
>>>Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com
>>>
>>
>>So? This doesn't answer my question. This just talks about blog spam -
>>something entirely different.
>>
>>I repeat - what makes you think you NEED this level of security? What are
>>you doing which leads you to suspect you'd have a problem with abuse of
>>the form?
>>
>
> he want's to avoid *any* spamming, he wants to protect themselves from all
> and any emails that don't belong there in their system, which is great I
> think.
>
> What concersn the 100% security you advertise earlier, there is no way of
> making webapps 100% secure and avoid *all* misuse. If you still claim so I
> guess you are in for a Nobel price soon. It's just software after all...

The only way to prevent *any* spamming is by not having an email box.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================