Re: What about letting x.( ... ? ... ) be equivalent to ( ... x ... )
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


comp.lang.python archive

Re: What about letting x.( ... ? ... ) be equivalent to ( ... x ... )

From: al <al@none.fr>
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 15:50:40 CEST

> It seems to me that what you proposed was a "solution", that seems
> obvious only to you, to a problem perceived only by you.
>
> I am afraid you would have to work rather harder to persuade me that
> there is a problem, let alone that you have found the solution to it.

Hello, I never said there is a problem, since you can do whithout it. I
just said that in some cases, it's better and cleaner to do it in
another way, and also that this solution is a complement : it does not
replace or break nothing.

Regards,
Al
Received on Sat Oct 15 04:21:25 2005