Peter Hansen said unto the world upon 01/07/2005 11:47:
> Dan Sommers wrote:
>
>>Peter Hansen <peter@engcorp.com> wrote:
>>
>>>This problem is well suited to the abilities of genetic algorithms,
>>>and this would probably be an excellent way to learn more about them,
>>>even if you don't get the best solution.
>>
>>There's some sort of irony or something in there about not writing the
>>best genetic algorithm, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
>
>
> Maybe your irony sensor is getting muddled over the fact that genetic
> algorithms generally *don't* find the best solutions, just relatively
> good ones. They aren't an exhaustive search, they're basically a random
> search with some features thought to focus the search on more fruitful
> parts of the solution space, thus optimizing it. Unless *my* irony
> processors are malfunctioning, I don't think there's anything ironic
> about this. (If anything it looks like the exact opposite of irony, to me.)
>
> -Peter
Well, I found it ironic, but only when you add that the genetic
algorithm approach came up in the context of a "best fit" problem.
Survival of the fittest indeed :-)
Best,
Brian vdB
Received on Thu Sep 29 16:42:02 2005