from cvs: recognizing canonical but non-pure lists
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


comp.lang.tcl archive

from cvs: recognizing canonical but non-pure lists

From: Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
Date: Thu Sep 08 2005 - 11:37:28 CEST



I noticed on cvs the change that finally fixes the


negative impact (esp. in eval) of "poisoning" list


objects with string-reps.



However the changes are so many (including reformatted


comments) that I can't really get a picture of what 


changed.



Will barewords be recognized as possible canonical lists?


 (Will  "eval mycommand [list foo bar ...]"  benefit?)


Will  concat and uplevel(with or without level-spec) also 


  benefit from it?



Even if these will not, its still a big win, I think.


Received on Thu Sep 29 14:36:01 2005