Re: tcl command "type"
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


comp.lang.tcl archive

Re: tcl command "type"

From: <suchodj@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun Jan 01 2006 - 01:24:58 CET

Alan
i have utilized the puts proposition but i just wondered if there
was a dumping possibility.
As far as Bryan's code it just opens a file i agree with you.
The solution of Bryan by the catch test if also a good one.
Let me thank both of you for your friendly concern and since
it is now, here, 20 min after 1 o'clok on sonday 1rst 2006 my best
wishes for both of you for 2006.
friendly
jerome

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:52:23 GMT, Alan Anderson
<aranders@insightbb.com> wrote:

>suchodj@wanadoo.fr wrote:
>
>> thank you for helping.
>> my idea was the following : i am coding a little application and
>> sourcing several files in a sort of main file. In order to check if
>> the files were correctly sourced i thaught of dumping them ???
>
>If you want to make sure the files were [source]d properly, you can use
>the [info proc] command to verify the existence of the expected
>procedures. Alternately, you can put a [puts] command in the file being
>[source]d, which should be executed as it is read by the interpreter.
>
>> Anyway with your code I will be able to make my dumping.
>
>Bryan's [type] just reads a file and returns its contents. It won't
>tell you whether the [source] command was used.
>
>> Sorry if my checking solution is "exageratly newbee-ish".
>
>It looks like you might be thinking of the Tcl shell as if it were an
>ancient BASIC interpreter. The [source] command doesn't "load" a file
>to be run later. It actually interprets the file as it is read.
Received on Tue Jan 3 03:10:00 2006