Re: A Question about FireWall logging

----- Original Message -----
From: "Moe Trin" <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld>
Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: A Question about FireWall logging

> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.security.firewalls, in
> article
> <lCCWf.9470$Bj7.2187@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, Duane Arnold
> wrote:
>
>>Yeah, that's what I did. And what's any of this above have to do with
>>anything if I see the same IP coming at a port or port(s) and I want to do
>>it?
>
> If you blocked it - why are you seeing it?

Because the log viewer I am using shows the traffic, if that's not a problem
for you.
>
>>Don't be getting into all the protocol stuff with me as I know all
>>about it.
>
> No Duane, I don't think you do know.

Oh, like some kind of protocols needs some kind of rocket scientist like you
to figure it. Hell, I have been the IT field since 1971 -- Operations,
Network, Tech Support, Computer Programmer etc, etc.

Do you actually think that you're the only one that can interpret or
understand something?

You need to get out of my face with this Old One.
>
>>If I want to set a rule to block an IP even if it's being blocked by
>>DEFAULT, that's my business.
>
> True - but don't expect everyone to have to block a /8 and a /9 within
> that, and a /10 within that, on up to a /32. If the range is blocked, it's
> blocked and adding the same block over and over is an example of not
> understanding what is going on. Or, you're using a toy that doesn't do
> the job..

Look Old man, who did anything over and over?

I should *dog* you about this but I won't

The only reason that's stopping me is that I got a minuscule amount of
respect for you.

Duane
Received on Mon May 1 01:03:27 2006