Re: guidance sought
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


comp.security.firewalls archive

Re: guidance sought

From: ArtDent <par@noyd.invalidname>
Date: Fri Mar 31 2006 - 22:39:20 CEST

On 31-Mar-2006, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

> In real world testing, in 20 different users homes, where before
> installation of the PFW solution they were compromised, after cleaning
> their machines and installing a PFW, they remained compromise free for
> more than 6 months - where they were compromised in under a week each
> time before.
>
> Seems technical enough for me - a Windows Firewall does not protect the
> users from much of anything, most of the PFW applications (like ZAP)
> protect users from more than Windows Firewall ever thought of - and it
> seems to keep them clean for a long time.
>
> I'm not saying that PFW solutions can't be misused or misconfigured, we
> all know they can, but they help a lot more than Windows Firewall does
> and a lot more than using nothing.

Thank you. This is exactly the point I have been trying to make.

-- 
We apologize for the inconvenience
Received on Mon May 1 01:03:44 2006