Duane Arnold wrote:
>> Exactly what equipment is Verizon providing? If you made it clear to
>> them that you will be connecting more than one computer then they are
>> likely supplying a modem / wireless router combo. Can be one box or
>> two. That would mean that none of your computers plug directly into
>> the modem but instead plug into the router or use the wireless
>> function. That would mean that you are behind a NAT firewall. A NAT
>> firewall simply means that your computer IP addresses are private and
>> not public. Bad people on the Internet can not then scan your public
>> IP and see your computers. This is good.
>>
>
>
> NAT is not FW software.
>
> <snip>
>
> Impostors
>
> When discussing firewalls, packet screening methods, and how firewalls
> function, there are a few misconceptions that need to be addressed.
>
> Network Address Translation (NAT)
> One technology that is commonly thought to act as a firewall solution is
> Network Address Translation (NAT). NAT translates "internal" IP addresses
> on one network to "external" IP addresses on another network. There are
> three methods NAT uses to accomplish address translation.
>
> Static NAT - maps a specific single address to another specific single
> address.
>
>
> Example:
> 10.0.0.1 -mapped to- 168.13.1.1
>
>
> Pooled NAT- dynamically maps all specific single addresses to a pool or
> range of external addresses.
>
>
> Example:
> 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.254 -mapped to- 168.13.1.1-168.13.1.254
>
>
> Port Level NAT- dynamically maps all specific single internal addresses
> to a specific single external address. The internal address is mapped or
> identified by the specific external address in combination with a unique
> port number.
>
> Example:
> 10.0.0.1 -mapped to- 168.13.1.1:1084
> 10.0.0.2 -mapped to- 168.13.1.1:1085
> 10.0.0.3 -mapped to- 168.13.1.1:1086
>
>
> By comparing the way NAT functions between two networks, and the way
> packet screening methods function between two networks, you can see that
> NAT does not adhere to the firewall definition. NAT does not control
> access between the networks. Some may argue that NAT does control access
> because you cannot "see" the internal network. NAT does this not by using
> rules or filters, however, but through concealment. It hides the network
> from outside users.
>
> <snip>
>
> Duane :)
What if I said SPI firewall? Do you think that qualifies? I don't know if the
Verizon supplied gear has that but Linksys claims it as a "firewall" in ads and
packaging.
Received on Thu Sep 29 19:58:20 2005