Re: Spybot and ZoneAlarm

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:18:36 +0300, "NightLegend"
<nightlegend@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

>I know ofcource that (send mail) permission is not technically effective for
>this matter but I just wanted to make sure of covering all the possibilities

 That's all fine, well and good, but that wasn't how it was worded.
You said "You have to give Spybot full access to both trusted &
internet zone including (sending mail)". Let me draw your attention
to the words "have to" and "including (sending mail)".
 That's what I was mainly responding to, because it was incorrect.

>even the weird ones ,and as for the trusted IP it was just another
>suggestion for the tiny possibility of Zone having a problem with the
>updates server ,and all the suggestions posted in any group is merely
>suggestion ,meaning that it could succeed or fail and as you know there is

 Nothing wrong with suggestions, opinions or facts... as long as there
is no doubt which one it is.
 As has been alluded to here, and in many other places, it's not
really so much what you say, but *how* you say it.

>nothing in the world that is absolutely right 100% or absolutely wrong 100%.

"absolutely wrong 100%":
 Spam
 Trying to put crap on my computer without my knowledge or permission

"absolutely right 100%":
 It's *MY* damn computer!

-- 
 dak
 My SpywareBlaster Custom Blocking List:
 <http://customblockinglist.cjb.net/>