Re: ZoneAlarm Pro 2.6.362 - Is it still good?

"Kerodo" <loopback@localhost.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d6c4ea76f3d39f2989682@news.east.cox.net...
| In article <6sudneyr1vAjlZ_eRVn-sw@comcast.com>, dnafutz@aol.spam.com
| says...
| > I have ZoneAlarm Pro 2.6.362 on a number of older networked Win98SE
PCs
| > that I only use occasionally and rarely use them to connect to the
web.
| > Is it still a good program?
| >
| > I have a NAT router and I use Kerio 2.15 on the systems that are web
| > active.
| >
| > Chas.
|
| 2.6.362 is great if you want a bloat-free ZA. I suppose it's better
to
| use an updated version, but I like 2.6.362 myself and have used it
many
| times before with good results.

Thanks, I had some nightmares with ZA 3.x and switched to Kerio 2.14.
Later tried Kerio 4.x and went back to 2.15. I didn't feel like doing
uninstalls/installs on half a dozen systems that are rarely connected to
the web (or even turned on).

Chas.
Received on Thu Sep 29 20:02:52 2005