Re: Port scans through NAT router?

Dom wrote:
>>I rest my case.
>
>
> This case is far from closed. The link provided but a single piece of
> the puzzle: "...NAT equipment that would accept packets addressed to the
> correct internal IP..." To actually make this happen requires specific
> vectors that are not addressed by that vague-at-best link.

LOL

It's *closed* as far as I am concerned.

You have been caught with your pants down. Is your underwear clean? The
article I got from WatchGuard was saying basically same thing that I
posted in this NG as few months back on how a NAT device can be
attacked. I didn't keep that either. See if you can find that *Sherlock*.

I am going to start calling you Bullshit NAT King Dom. <g>

Duane :)
Received on Tue Feb 7 20:58:24 2006