Re: A good firewall working fine in default?
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


comp.security.firewalls archive

Re: A good firewall working fine in default?

From: Volker Birk <bumens@dingens.org>
Date: Wed Feb 15 2006 - 08:54:16 CET

Poster 60 <ekron@wapda.com> wrote:
> I've tried testing what you have said here and in previous threads. I
> have turned off Zone Alarm
> and the only defense (excluding AV program) that is between me and the
> internet is my Linksys router - BEFSR41 - 4 port, stating on the box
> that it has NAT technology.

NAT is not a security feature. Better turn on filtering on your router,
too.

> I went to grc.com and their tests say all ports are secure.

http://grcsucks.com

> INTERNAL IP EXPOSED
> xxx.xxx.x.xxx
> (I put x's for the numbers so as not to give out my settings)
> The message below came from the spyware testpage.

This is just nonsense. Forget that. There is no danger for you by exposing
your "internal IP".

Yours,
VB.

-- 
> My windows XP is updated for all critical updates including survive pack 2.
Norman Perry in c.s.f
Received on Mon May 1 00:50:48 2006