Re: remote desktop ports

From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <usenet-2006@planetcobalt.net>
Date: Mon Feb 20 2006 - 16:00:10 CET

Wayne wrote:
> "Volker Birk" wrote in message news:43f64b1d@news.uni-ulm.de...
>> Wayne <wayne@briz.oz> wrote:
>>> And why not use 3389 publically, I have been for the past 5 years
>>> with no problems at all.
>>
>> Yes. With no problems at all, at least no problems you did realize.
>
> No problems, full stop, Volker. I see ports probes at times, but no
> logon or logon attempts to my DC.

There's more things, Horatio, than port probes and logon attempts.

Like Volker said: no problems you realized.

cu
59cobalt

-- 
"All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches
becoming available."
--Jason Coombs on Bugtraq

Received on Mon May 1 00:51:55 2006

comp.security.firewalls archive

Re: remote desktop ports