Re: Reliability of Networking Hardware?
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


comp.security.firewalls archive

Re: Reliability of Networking Hardware?

From: w_tom <w_tom1@usa.net>
Date: Mon Feb 27 2006 - 05:39:37 CET

  Leythos repeatedly (like a broken record) makes this claim that a UPS
protected some electronics. Meanwhile he again forgets to list those
other appliances that had no surge protector and also were not damaged.
 With or without that UPS, adjacent electronics would not be damage.
Therefore, he must have invisible protectors on those other unddamaged
electronics. So why does he not tell us how to install invisible
protectors on those other appliances?

  Meanwhile, effective 'whole house' protectors protect everything.
That reality: a protector is only as effective as its earth ground - as
was well proven long before Leythos even existed. A shunt mode
protector (including those inside UPSes) are ineffective without that
earth ground. Even his UPS numerical specs do not claim to provide
protection. Earth ground being THE most critical component of a
protection 'system'.

  That protection 'system' so that "protection already inside
appliances" is not overwhelmed. That "protection already inside
appliance" is why appliances not on a UPS were not damaged.

Leythos wrote:
> Yea, he's like a broken record, always ignores that there are many cases
> were a "Quality" UPS solution has actually saved devices from electrical
> damage while devices connected to the same AC Power source were
> damaged....
>
> I've never lost ANY hardware connected to a Quality UPS, but I've lost
> several devices that were not protected at the same time.
Received on Mon May 1 00:53:19 2006