Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> Spender wrote:
>
>
>>Maybe you watch too much television. Have you talked to any teenagers
>>recently? Most are incredibly ignorant. Sure, they can often get around
>>software solutions such as Net Nanny (often with the help of some
>>knowledgeable pedophile unfortunately), but a properly setup firewall is
>>considerably more difficult to circumvent.
>
>
> No, trivial as always. Just Google Cache is enough to do so, or do you
> want to deny access to Google?
>
>
>>>>>Home users usually don't need a firewall at all.
>>>>
>>>>Wrong, those are the ones that need it most.
>>>
>>>Totally wrong. Home users don't have a clue about networking so they
>>>can't achieve any security with firewalls.
>>
>>Speaking for yourself again. Basic firewalling is not difficult at all.
>
>
> Yeah, it's breaking everything. And pretty soon the users allows this or
> that, or if something doesn't work he disables it temporarily. Pretty
> unavoidable with such crappy default settings. And as long as IE, OE, MS
> Office, MSN Messenger, mIRC or other crap is allowed, you'll get the
> malware anyway.
Not true with a decent firewall that does IPS.
>
>
>>Actually yes, a really good firewall can help by blocking content.
>
>
> So, blocking all JavaScript, CSS, all Links containing "ftp:", Objects
> and (I)Frames?
>
No. Siganture based detection. Blockeing PARTICULAR javascript exploits,
etc.
>
>>But have you ever considered a simple popup blocker?
>
>
> Do I need one? My webbrowser has a default deny policy on all JavaScript
> and NSPlugin actions invoking opening a new window with a configuration
> notice. I wouldn't even call it blocking, it's just a must-have feature.
Received on Mon May 1 00:53:39 2006