Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


sci.crypt archive

Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe

From: Ari Silverstein <abcarisilverstein@yahoo.comxyz>
Date: Thu Mar 30 2006 - 01:35:09 CEST

On 29 Mar 2006 14:48:40 -0800, Paul Rubin wrote:

> Ari Silverstein <abcarisilverstein@yahoo.comxyz> writes:
>> Absolutely correct but if you look outside in the real world, where 99.9%
>> of the real people live outside of sci.crypt,...
>> The average user is mainly concerned with opening of their emails in the
>> transportation process (of which they don't know jackshit). If this makes
>> them feel at ease, then wtf is wrong with that?
>
> We're not talking about an average user outside of sci.crypt. We're
> talking about someone who came to sci.crypt with a cryptography
> question, presumably because they had security issues that the average
> user doesn't necessarily face.

If that is the case, then why is he attempting such a known and insecure
methodology? The assumption would be that either he is a dumbass or that
the end use is for dumbasses.

-- 
Drop the alphabet for email
Received on Mon May 1 01:53:38 2006