Re: Bruce Schneier Gets It Wrong
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


sci.crypt archive

Re: Bruce Schneier Gets It Wrong

From: Francois Grieu <fgrieu@francenet.fr>
Date: Thu Mar 30 2006 - 18:19:43 CEST

In article <e0gsba$23og$2@agate.berkeley.edu>,
 daw@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) wrote:

> I think it's a little early to make assumptions
> about what they're proposing based on a press release;
> we don't really know what their scheme is.

Head to
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-adv.html
and paste the following line in the Query field:
IN/Umeno-Ken

You'll get patent applications, many I guess involving
the person cited in the "New Scientist" article cited by
"The Register", with #20050242987 revolving around using
stars as a random number generator for cryptography.

The same query at
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/search-adv.htm
will give you US patents, and confort you in the opinion
that the guy has a, foundness, for random numbers.

   François Grieu
Received on Mon May 1 01:53:50 2006