Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> > none wrote:
> >
> >>jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> >>
> >>>jshsucks@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>I've already taken my idea of focusing on n^2 - r to get a result
> >>>>>related to Goldbach's conjecture, which can be found on my blog. I've
> >>>>>decided not to post it on Usenet for now, as I'm less and less thrilled
> >>>>>with reply quality.
> >>>>
> >>>>You decided not to post it to usenet so that you can pretend that it is
> >>>>correct and important.
> >>>>
> >>>>What about the posts from a few days ago where you had this great proof
> >>>>relating to primes, and you dared anyone to post a counterexample. You
> >>>>stated that no one could since you had a proof.
> >>>>
> >>>>I then posted a counterexample, and several other people did as well.
> >>>>The you were caught in yet another lie. And yet another great discovery
> >>>>of yours was blown apart.
> >>>>
> >>>>If you weren't so lazy and actually checked your conjectures before
> >>>>boasting that you have a proof, you wouldn't look quite as foolish.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>See what I mean? Yet another poster from sci.math coming over to here.
> >>>
> >>>Repy quality from that group is abysmal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>James Harris
> >>>
> >>
> >>Well, people *are* allowed to subscribe to more than one group. And the
> >>poster's point ( that all too often counterexamples to your "proofs" are
> >>found within a matter of minutes) is completely true.
> >>"Out of the box" thinking can sometimes lead to advances, in maths and
> >>other fields, but it is not guaranteed to do so... so keep thinking,
> >>James, but if you don't check your results carefully before posting,
> >>then don't be surprised if people find mistakes in them.
> >
> >
> > I am talking about deliberate stalking with posters who NEVER post on
> > sci.crypt except to come over and try to distract from what I'm saying,
> > who are regular posters on the sci.math newsgroup.
>
> There you go again, leaping to conclusions that are not supported by
> reality (your life story, eh). It just so happens that I read several
> newsgroups - of which sci.crypt is one - daily. I read these groups
> whether you post to them or not, and I rarely post, unless it's in
> response to some hurting unit who hasn't a clue!
>
> Don't believe me? Do a google search on my name and find out! I must
> warn you though, some clown also goes by my monicker, and it seems that
> most of the hits are for him.
>
> <JSH sniveling snipped>
>
> >
> > Consider this area as an example where I'm focusing on
> >
> > n^2 - r
> >
> > with r a non-square as I'm focusing on interesting features of
> > quadratic residues for finding primes, which could be really important
> > to finding large primes, but the sci.math'ers come over to talk basic
> > info about quadratic residues that anyone who picks up an introductory
> > text on the subject will find is information already known.
>
> Yes, I talked about very basic mathematical concepts which you didn't
> understand correctly (how else do you explain your ignorance in regard
> to quadratic residues). This basic mathematics was exactly the subject
> of your original post in this thread, so why wouldn't I talk about it?
> Specifically, due to your poor understanding of said basic mathematics,
> I wasn't sure exactly what you were yaking about. So I posed a few
> questions for clarification, which Arturo, using his amazing JSH
> language translation skills, was able to show me exactly how trivial
> your post was!
>
> >
> > Creativity can inspire hatred.
>
> So does an ignoramus who thinks he's creative!
>
> >
> >
> > James Harris
> >
>
> Bob Terwilliger

And now you can see the sci.math'ers true colors.

He calls my ideas trivial, and also stoops to calling me an ignoramus.

It's hatred. These people post out of hatred working to convince
others that none of my ideas are of value, but they do things like work
together as a group to email a math journal that dares publish a paper
of mine.

They work so hard to convince others that my ideas are all crap, which
doesn't explain their dedication in working so hard to convince people
such that it requires dozens of people--literally--from the sci.math
newsgroup who seem to have this as a job based on their posting rate,
and remember, there are also webpages including the website Crank.net
maintained by, yup, a former sci.math regular.

We live in a world defined by its hatreds.

So there are people who go after creativity in the math field.

Are you really surprised?

Trust them if you want, but they depend on your trust, to betray it.

James Harris
Received on Mon May 1 02:03:50 2006