Re: Factoring method with quad res result?
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


sci.crypt archive

Re: Factoring method with quad res result?

From: <jstevh@msn.com>
Date: Sun Apr 30 2006 - 02:55:43 CEST

Rob wrote:
> James,
>
> STOP POSTING AND START WRITING. I AM ONE OF THE FEW PEOPLE HERE TAKING
>
> YOU SERIOUSLY, AND I ASKED FOR A REVISED VERSION OF YOUR PAPER, AND I
> HAVE YET TO SEE ANYTHING.
>

That's old research. Read my blog and you can see the argument given
more simply with quadratics anyway.

Just about everything is on my math blog, explained several times, in
different ways.

Lots on the blog.

>
> IF YOU ARE A REAL MATHEMATICIAN, YOU SHOULD NOT CARE WHAT PEOPLE ON
> HERE THINK. YOU SHOULD STOP POSTING HERE OVER AND OVER, AND START
> WRITING LOTS AND LOTS OF STUFF!! WRITE A FOOL-PROOF PAPER ON YOUR
> PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM IF YOU WANT!!! JUST MAKE IT WRITTEN
> WELL!!! BUT BE WILLING TO SEE THE MISTAKES IN IT THAT ARE THERE,
> CORRECT THEM, AND MOVE ON. THAT IS THE MARK OF A REAL MATHEMATICIAN.
>

Hey, I'm actively researching. For some freaking reason posting helps
me to figure out new stuff.

This quadratic residue result is just freaking incredible.

It just gets bigger and bigger and bigger.

You want me to worry about old research like my proof of Fermat's Last
Theorem to take a break from this exciting new research??!!!

Yeah, like that's going to happen.

FLT is old news for me. I've had the proof for years. I'm into new
things now.

>
> Einstein's image has gradually become an icon which sums up the
> sometimes eccentric brilliance of the physicist. When an outraged
> Hitler produced a paper entitled "100 Scientists Against Einstein" he
> simply replied, "If I were wrong, one would have been enough."
>

Hey, good quote. It is kind of telling when it takes a lot of people
talking about social stuff, especially in mathematics, to try and block
one person.

But, of course, Einstein wasn't a mathematician. He was a great
physicist.

He got help for a lot of his complicated math stuff, in the general
theory of relativity from a math grad student.

Mathematicians have often helped people out in other fields, where the
ideas were generated by someone who didn't quite know all the
mathematics necessary to fully mathematicize it.

Einstein is a good example--he really had a time with Riemannian
geometry.

But my favorite example is Michael Faraday as he didn't know a lick of
mathematics.

Figured out the laws of electrodynamics imagining playing with rubber
bands.

Now that is awesome.

James Harris
Received on Mon May 1 02:06:14 2006