sci.crypt archive

• Mon Oct 31 2005 - 16:12:47 CET
  • Re: rsa karthikaditi@gmail.com 
  • REPOST: Re: rsa karthikaditi@gmail.com 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 22:39:44 CEST
  • Re: Messages lost on sci.crypt ? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 22:08:43 CEST
  • Re: Messages lost on sci.crypt ? Mike Amling 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 21:58:32 CEST
  • Re: Messages lost on sci.crypt ? Mike Amling 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 19:13:29 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents Roger Schlafly 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 18:33:44 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 18:23:04 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 18:16:08 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 12:52:01 CEST
  • Re: Messages lost on sci.crypt ? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 12:49:47 CEST
  • I am HUIHAI ... as you called me ... in February 2000 ... HUIHAI ..A Chinese corporation .. The Brigadier 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 12:17:29 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 12:14:51 CEST
  • Re: TDES crypto accelerator coprocessor 192bit tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 10:07:44 CEST
  • Messages lost on sci.crypt ? Francois Grieu 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 06:11:28 CEST
  • Re: Common attacks on Oblivious Transfer Douglas Eagleson 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 06:09:05 CEST
  • Re: Common attacks on Oblivious Transfer Douglas Eagleson 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 05:10:11 CEST
  • Re: Encryption newbie - Same length encrypted result TC 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 05:08:56 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Oct 23 2005 - 05:08:55 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 20:28:24 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 20:13:48 CEST
  • Cryptoanalysis challenge tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 20:00:38 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES ddyer@real-me.net 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 19:56:01 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES ddyer@real-me.net 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 19:50:06 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES ddyer@real-me.net 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 18:21:44 CEST
  • Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree MB 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 18:01:11 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 18:00:04 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:49:18 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:46:04 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:44:14 CEST
  • Re: ECC is real Easy to OPen in NUmercial Terms-likely Lefty Bigfoot 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:19:56 CEST
  • Re: PIN card Peter Pearson 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:10:22 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents Roger Schlafly 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:47:56 CEST
  • Re: ECC is real Easy to OPen in NUmercial Terms-likely Douglas Eagleson 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:39:40 CEST
  • ECC is real Easy to OPen in NUmercial Terms-likely Douglas Eagleson 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:26:14 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 15:30:35 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents Ari Silversteinn 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:55:44 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:46:52 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:28:14 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:11:59 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 13:49:25 CEST
  • Re: ECC Patents Paul Rubin 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 13:45:02 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 13:41:25 CEST
  • ECC Patents tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 13:38:07 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:59:57 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent Paul Rubin 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:57:00 CEST
  • Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:30:04 CEST
  • advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent lkcl@lkcl.net 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 11:44:40 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? Paul Rubin 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 10:53:44 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:39:18 CEST
  • Re: MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:37:16 CEST
  • Re: Finding generator polynomial over GF(2^3) David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:33:29 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:32:11 CEST
  • Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 08:02:27 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 04:50:53 CEST
  • Golem - a fiction book with a cipher challenge Agent Wookie 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 04:03:12 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio John Savard 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 04:00:50 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio John Savard 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 03:53:25 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio John Savard 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 03:32:54 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Paul Rubin 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 01:36:34 CEST
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ Paul Rubin 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 01:30:35 CEST
  • Re: whats the difference between Encryption and Encoding ? or both are same ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 01:24:46 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Paul Rubin 
• Mon Oct 17 2005 - 00:49:47 CEST
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 23:34:01 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind nemo_outis 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 22:50:13 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 22:46:23 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 22:42:13 CEST
  • Re: whats the difference between Encryption and Encoding ? or both are same ? BRG 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 22:29:55 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES ddyer@real-me.net 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 21:31:03 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 21:21:57 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Arthur 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 21:00:07 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Andrew Swallow 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 20:50:04 CEST
  • Re: whats the difference between Encryption and Encoding ? or both are same ? joes 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 20:26:44 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 19:37:16 CEST
  • Re: whats the difference between Encryption and Encoding ? or both are same ? Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 19:36:40 CEST
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 19:26:30 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 19:08:05 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Arthur 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 19:02:07 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Arthur 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 18:40:28 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Arthur 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 18:28:47 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Arthur 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 18:23:26 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Arthur 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 17:53:48 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 17:47:55 CEST
  • Re: Snake oil cryptography Phil Carmody 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 17:17:40 CEST
  • whats the difference between Encryption and Encoding ? or both are same ? minreh@gmail.com 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 16:19:35 CEST
  • Re: MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme Crypto Loko 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 16:16:14 CEST
  • Re: MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme Crypto Loko 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 15:44:07 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 15:11:39 CEST
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 15:00:46 CEST
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 14:38:51 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio posting@big-numbers.com 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 12:59:36 CEST
  • For those who can speak German: Cisco password revealer Jan Panteltje 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 12:57:29 CEST
  • Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree MB 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 10:28:23 CEST
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ R.M. 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 06:36:09 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 05:58:10 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 01:59:18 CEST
  • Re: PIN card Peter Pearson 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 01:43:31 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Peter Pearson 
• Sun Oct 16 2005 - 01:39:33 CEST
  • Re: Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Will Dickson 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 22:42:01 CEST
  • Finding generator polynomial over GF(2^3) jeffconner50@yahoo.com 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 21:49:25 CEST
  • Re: A Parity Cracking Implementation Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 21:43:48 CEST
  • A Parity Cracking Implementation Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 18:05:13 CEST
  • Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 17:47:06 CEST
  • Newbie naive question, perhaps - - be kind Arthur 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 14:38:08 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 13:51:10 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio posting@big-numbers.com 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 12:10:24 CEST
  • Snake oil cryptography Lapo Luchini 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 11:13:06 CEST
  • Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree Phil Carmody 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 10:17:26 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? D. J. Bernstein 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 01:57:03 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? John Savard 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 01:56:59 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 01:10:15 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:44:36 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Ari Silversteinn 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:39:12 CEST
  • Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree MB 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:16:10 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Unruh 
• Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:08:55 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Unruh 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 22:40:27 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 22:33:34 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES David Wagner 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 22:07:03 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES ddyer@real-me.net 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 21:23:31 CEST
  • ECCN and CCATS number Incog Nito 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 20:24:14 CEST
  • Re: Open source Java encryption code Paul Rubin 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 20:18:43 CEST
  • Re: Open source Java encryption code Mike Amling 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 20:06:31 CEST
  • PIN card Mike Amling 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 19:46:13 CEST
  • Re: Open source Java encryption code Paul Rubin 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 19:39:12 CEST
  • Open source Java encryption code Mike Amling 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:40:36 CEST
  • Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree David Wagner 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:35:05 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Mike Amling 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:07:41 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:05:04 CEST
  • Re: Problem with SSL crypto functions Carlos Moreno 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:55:12 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Paul Rubin 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:54:41 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Paul Rubin 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:40:22 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:24:49 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:08:06 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:05:55 CEST
  • Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 14:56:57 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Andrew Swallow 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 14:40:27 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 14:12:59 CEST
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined? Jon A. Solworth 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 13:56:26 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Andrew Swallow 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 13:51:18 CEST
  • Jacobi symbols of higher degree MB 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 13:44:53 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Andrew Swallow 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 13:22:17 CEST
  • Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES John E. Hadstate 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 12:51:27 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 11:37:07 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 11:11:34 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:31:25 CEST
  • needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES ddyer@real-me.net 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 09:53:08 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Chris Barts 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 09:41:14 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 09:09:48 CEST
  • New Website sina sodagar 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 05:13:55 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Paul Rubin 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 03:44:29 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Unruh 
• Fri Oct 14 2005 - 03:42:40 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Unruh 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 22:52:23 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Gregory G Rose 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 19:06:11 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Paul Rubin 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 19:00:32 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 18:58:04 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 18:51:50 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Unruh 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 18:13:41 CEST
  • Re: Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? Paul Rubin 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 18:05:46 CEST
  • Symetric encryption : DES or not DES ? O.L. 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 17:49:57 CEST
  • Re: Problem with SSL crypto functions Juan MORENO 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 17:47:46 CEST
  • Re: Problem with SSL crypto functions Juan MORENO 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 16:55:15 CEST
  • Re: Problem with SSL crypto functions Carlos Moreno 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 14:58:56 CEST
  • Re: Please help to determine checksum calculation method Christian Siebert 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 13:02:49 CEST
  • Re: Problem with SSL crypto functions Twittering One 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 12:25:35 CEST
  • Please help to determine checksum calculation method Andrus 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 11:23:07 CEST
  • Problem with SSL crypto functions Juan MORENO 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 02:58:01 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Bill Unruh 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 02:37:44 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Unruh 
• Thu Oct 13 2005 - 02:11:30 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 20:02:50 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Alun Jones 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 19:57:32 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Colin Percival 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 18:29:43 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Andrew Swallow 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 18:26:36 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Phil Frisbie, Jr. 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:31:37 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Unruh 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:23:30 CEST
  • Re: OT: Re: PHD subject (topic? what topic?) tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:03:43 CEST
  • Re: OT: Re: PHD subject (topic? what topic?) Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:01:34 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 16:29:14 CEST
  • Re: Realization of IDEA algorithm TC 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:28:00 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Pubkeybreaker 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 14:21:01 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Richard Herring 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 14:17:07 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio A. Caspis 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 13:44:58 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio John Savard 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 09:14:54 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 08:20:41 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Unruh 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 08:16:32 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Unruh 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 06:39:45 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio David Wagner 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 06:35:28 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio pragnik@gmail.com 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 06:16:18 CEST
  • OT: Re: PHD subject (topic? what topic?) Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 06:16:17 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 05:26:01 CEST
  • Re: Impact of encryption algorithms on audio David Wagner 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 05:01:44 CEST
  • Impact of encryption algorithms on audio pragnik@gmail.com 
• Wed Oct 12 2005 - 00:29:12 CEST
  • Re: Looking for a practical checksum algorithm Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Oct 11 2005 - 21:11:16 CEST
  • CodeCon 2006 Call For Papers Len Sassaman 
• Tue Oct 11 2005 - 14:38:21 CEST
  • Re: A Number Theory Problem about gcd Gordon 
• Tue Oct 11 2005 - 12:34:32 CEST
  • Re: CRC32 Ethernet for 32 bits data Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Tue Oct 11 2005 - 10:11:54 CEST
  • Re: CRC32 Ethernet for 32 bits data Damien Wyart 
• Tue Oct 11 2005 - 09:22:29 CEST
  • Re: Realization of IDEA algorithm Chris Barts 
• Tue Oct 11 2005 - 08:52:31 CEST
  • CRC32 Ethernet for 32 bits data bp_site@tiscali.fr 
• Tue Oct 11 2005 - 04:14:54 CEST
  • Re: Looking for a practical checksum algorithm kent@cpttm.org.mo 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 22:25:23 CEST
  • Re: University Of London; External programme; Msc Information Security tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 22:21:10 CEST
  • Re: University Of London; External programme; Msc Information Security maths@tokyo.com 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 21:48:21 CEST
  • University Of London; External programme; Msc Information Security maths@tokyo.com 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 19:20:14 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunksexploitation technique Casper H.S. Dik 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 18:09:47 CEST
  • Re: Looking for a practical checksum algorithm Unruh 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 16:32:43 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunksexploitation technique Casper H.S. Dik 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 15:31:18 CEST
  • Re: Looking for a practical checksum algorithm daniel bleichenbacher 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 13:24:09 CEST
  • Re: Realization of IDEA algorithm Dave Howe 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:45:14 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunksexploitation technique joseph_daniel_zukiger@yahoo.com 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 07:59:22 CEST
  • Re: A Number Theory Problem about gcd Alexey Kats 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 07:44:07 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code Tim Wescott 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 05:39:09 CEST
  • Re: A Number Theory Problem about gcd Gordon 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 05:36:03 CEST
  • Looking for a practical checksum algorithm kent@cpttm.org.mo 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 04:30:26 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Alun Jones 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 04:28:36 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Alun Jones 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 03:01:10 CEST
  • Re: A Number Theory Problem about gcd Alexey Kats 
• Mon Oct 10 2005 - 02:41:35 CEST
  • Re: A Number Theory Problem about gcd Mike Amling 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 20:04:05 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 19:05:22 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 17:36:36 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 16:25:59 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Zeljko Vrba 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 15:56:52 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 13:19:19 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 12:03:03 CEST
  • Re: A Number Theory Problem about gcd Alexey Kats 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 09:23:39 CEST
  • A Number Theory Problem about gcd Gordon 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 08:33:24 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Zeljko Vrba 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 07:19:25 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Lenny G. 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 06:47:10 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code Unruh 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 04:08:10 CEST
  • Re: Help needed to evaluate crypto software obie 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:56:26 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code Will Dickson 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:44:53 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code Jerry Avins 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:27:04 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code Carlos Moreno 
• Sun Oct 09 2005 - 00:28:03 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code John E. Hadstate 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 23:36:46 CEST
  • Re: I am George W. Bush .. the God told me to this and that .... told a person found in many mental hospitals ... claire.easthope@ntlworld.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 23:24:37 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code Mike Amling 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 23:05:12 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Carlos Moreno 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 23:04:20 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique John E. Hadstate 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 23:04:06 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Paul Rubin 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 22:36:37 CEST
  • Realization of IDEA algorithm lonli.lokli@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 22:33:12 CEST
  • Re: I am George W. Bush .. the God told me to this and that .... told a person found in many mental hospitals ... Morpheus Stormcrow 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 20:18:21 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Zeljko Vrba 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 20:15:17 CEST
  • The Abstract Alphabet Attack, Not the Exact Alphabet Attack Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 18:32:24 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 18:24:34 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Andrew Swallow 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 18:20:44 CEST
  • Re: I am George W. Bush .. the God told me to this and that .... told a person found in many mental hospitals ... Andrew Swallow 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:38:13 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:32:19 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:23:54 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:23:41 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 14:27:25 CEST
  • Re: 31 bit pseudo-random number gen in C, C++ & dsPIC assembly code John E. Hadstate 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 13:01:36 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 11:58:16 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 09:26:21 CEST
  • I am George W. Bush .. the God told me to this and that .... told a person found in many mental hospitals ... The Brigadier 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 09:02:59 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Zeljko Vrba 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 07:24:48 CEST
  • Enigma Defined the Alphabet Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 06:02:50 CEST
  • Re: A Series of the Particular Detects the Alphabet Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 06:00:30 CEST
  • Re: A Series of the Particular Detects the Alphabet Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 06:00:24 CEST
  • Re: A Series of the Particular Detects the Alphabet Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 06:00:16 CEST
  • Re: A Series of the Particular Detects the Alphabet Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 05:52:49 CEST
  • A Series of the Particular Detects the Alphabet Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 05:01:28 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 02:14:43 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Bryan Olson 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 01:16:02 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 00:28:15 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 00:22:18 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 08 2005 - 00:15:27 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 23:56:35 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 23:16:00 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunksexploitation technique Carlos Moreno 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 21:23:05 CEST
  • ~ * A Morning Wood Annunciation ~ !*** twitteringfolly@aol.com 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 20:42:36 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 20:37:30 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunksexploitation technique Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 19:03:07 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 17:53:36 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Carlos Moreno 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:21:27 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Colin Percival 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:16:06 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Stephen Riley 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 12:49:13 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Milan VXdgsvt 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 10:11:59 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject daniel bleichenbacher 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 08:11:05 CEST
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Damien 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 03:49:32 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Paul Rubin 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 03:45:54 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject arachnidster@gmail.com 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 03:26:42 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation David Wagner 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 00:23:23 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Lenny G. 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 00:07:53 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Oct 07 2005 - 00:02:27 CEST
  • Re: Recover message from RSA signature Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 23:41:15 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Joe Peschel 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 21:19:15 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject Mike Nelson 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 20:44:24 CEST
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 19:16:33 CEST
  • Re: PHD subject tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:42:36 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Casper H.S. Dik 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:32:11 CEST
  • PHD subject Student 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:06:28 CEST
  • Re: Charity license with a build in (almost DWIM ) t3d programming language Alan Balmer 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 16:07:38 CEST
  • Re: Recover message from RSA signature tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 15:48:51 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Casper H.S. Dik 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:55:45 CEST
  • Charity license with a build in (almost DWIM ) t3d programming language Juuso Hukkanen 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:50:42 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Dave Howe 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:25:36 CEST
  • Re: Recover message from RSA signature tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:12:58 CEST
  • Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:40:11 CEST
  • Re: Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Victoria Hirt 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:37:44 CEST
  • X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique Jan Panteltje 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:10:13 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 05:10:43 CEST
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 04:39:50 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 03:37:22 CEST
  • Re: Recover message from RSA signature greatx 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 03:08:48 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Dave Howe 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 03:04:19 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Dave Howe 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:57:10 CEST
  • Making a weak Hash stronger until a fix comes along -- concatenation of hash functions... Max Power 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:55:56 CEST
  • Re: q Dave Howe 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:55:31 CEST
  • Re: q Dave Howe 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:12:43 CEST
  • Re: Recover message from RSA signature tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:11:15 CEST
  • Re: Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Victoria Hirt 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:48:13 CEST
  • Re: Recover message from RSA signature greatx 
• Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:41:36 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Unruh 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 23:17:24 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Vernon Schryver 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 21:53:46 CEST
  • Re: q John A. Malley 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 21:08:34 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Unruh 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 09:17:39 CEST
  • Re: q TC 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 07:30:47 CEST
  • Re: q Twittering One 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 06:03:43 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation David Wagner 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 05:50:58 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Lenny G. 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 05:50:45 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption Paul Rubin 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 05:14:51 CEST
  • Re: q Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 04:45:03 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption Mike Amling 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 04:31:00 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption Mike Amling 
• Wed Oct 05 2005 - 03:59:55 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Dave Howe 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 22:31:32 CEST
  • Re: q Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 20:52:46 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Milan VXdgsvt 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 18:57:36 CEST
  • Re: q Dave Howe 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 18:47:28 CEST
  • Re: Paper on SHA-1 attack Francois Grieu 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 17:37:26 CEST
  • Re: DJB cryptography pages? Unruh 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 17:20:40 CEST
  • Re: DJB cryptography pages? 1@2.3 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 16:36:37 CEST
  • Re: DES CBC Mode sandyinchina@gmail.com 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 14:01:01 CEST
  • Re: Paper on SHA-1 attack Eduardo Tongson 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 11:14:37 CEST
  • Re: DJB cryptography pages? Martin Carpenter 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 07:05:22 CEST
  • Re: DJB cryptography pages? Unruh 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 06:44:39 CEST
  • Re: DJB cryptography pages? 1@2.3 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 06:15:07 CEST
  • Re: DES CBC Mode Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 06:11:12 CEST
  • Paper on SHA-1 attack Francois Grieu 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 05:07:55 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 04:13:44 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key TC 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 02:52:00 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 01:42:15 CEST
  • Re: DJB cryptography pages? Paul Rubin 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 01:11:09 CEST
  • Re: DJB cryptography pages? 1@2.3 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 01:07:55 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation David Wagner 
• Tue Oct 04 2005 - 00:58:16 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Lenny G. 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 23:29:10 CEST
  • Re: The effects of quantum computers Unruh 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 22:14:43 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 20:35:19 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Lenny G. 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 19:19:22 CEST
  • Re: The effects of quantum computers Roger Schlafly 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 19:17:20 CEST
  • Which Java card to choose..... chaitu 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 19:09:09 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation David Wagner 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 18:59:45 CEST
  • Re: k-deterministic public-private key generation Lenny G. 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 18:58:53 CEST
  • Classifieds Site BayPortal.net 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 18:48:07 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Unruh 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:47:39 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Stephen Sprunk 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 16:55:19 CEST
  • Re: DES CBC Mode Ocean 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 16:48:20 CEST
  • Re: DES CBC Mode Peter Pearson 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 16:40:39 CEST
  • DJB cryptography pages? Paul Rubin 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 16:37:23 CEST
  • Re: www.liveboard.8my.com David Eather 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 14:38:43 CEST
  • DES CBC Mode Ocean 
• Mon Oct 03 2005 - 06:28:52 CEST
  • Recover message from RSA signature greatx 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 21:20:35 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Andrew Swallow 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 20:27:18 CEST
  • Re: MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme Paul Rubin 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 20:24:14 CEST
  • Re: MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 20:23:42 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 19:53:32 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Stephen Sprunk 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 19:19:54 CEST
  • Re: MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme David Wagner 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 16:05:37 CEST
  • Re: Lightbulb - analogy algorithm once more. Douglas Eagleson 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 15:50:09 CEST
  • Re: MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 15:33:48 CEST
  • MSDOS-Based Compilable Code for RSA / Other Public-Key Scheme Crypto Loko 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:55:08 CEST
  • Re: Fibonacci numbers, Lucas numbers and Huffman codes Alex Vinokur 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 11:38:31 CEST
  • Re: Thai Open Final Scoreline Twittering One 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 09:53:50 CEST
  • Re: Lightbulb - analogy algorithm once more. Bryan Olson 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 09:49:40 CEST
  • Re: Thai Open Final Scoreline Dave Hazelwood 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 09:47:38 CEST
  • Re: Thai Open Final Scoreline Dave Hazelwood 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 09:41:44 CEST
  • Re: Thai Open Final Scoreline Dave Hazelwood 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 09:38:45 CEST
  • Thai Open Final Scoreline Dave Hazelwood 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 07:07:42 CEST
  • Re: Making a weak Hash stronger until a fix comes along -- concatenation of hash functions... Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 04:06:27 CEST
  • Re: The effects of quantum computers Unruh 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 03:44:14 CEST
  • Re: Salsa20 altivec timings Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 02:37:19 CEST
  • Re: Salsa20 altivec timings D. J. Bernstein 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 01:17:20 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 01:01:45 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Oct 02 2005 - 00:03:51 CEST
  • Lightbulb - analogy algorithm once more. Douglas Eagleson 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 23:46:39 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key cleft 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 23:17:41 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key David Eather 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 23:02:12 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 22:50:04 CEST
  • Re: The effects of quantum computers Roger Schlafly 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 21:57:38 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 20:01:14 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 18:56:24 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 16:39:52 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 11:24:41 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key David Eather 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 11:12:24 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key David Eather 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 09:41:32 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle TC 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 05:02:44 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle Michael Brown 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 03:46:48 CEST
  • ATTN: Tom Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 03:36:47 CEST
  • help for evaluating for this crypto idea laicko 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 03:34:37 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle John Savard 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 03:32:52 CEST
  • Re: DDJ Article on "Secure" Dongle John Savard 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 03:31:17 CEST
  • Re: Are there any ASCII (or at least 6-bit baudot) implimentations of the matrix algebra cipher? John Savard 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 03:03:20 CEST
  • Re: How to generate a Windows style license key Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 02:59:15 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption Andrew Swallow 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 02:31:52 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption Paul Rubin 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 02:11:56 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption Unruh 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 01:38:32 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption John Hadstate 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 01:18:31 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption David Wagner 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 01:15:08 CEST
  • Re: Matrix algebra cipher, still usable for some tasks... David Wagner 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 00:57:42 CEST
  • Re: SSN encryption John E. Hadstate 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 00:51:07 CEST
  • Making a weak Hash stronger until a fix comes along -- concatenation of hash functions... Max Power 
• Sat Oct 01 2005 - 00:47:53 CEST
  • Matrix algebra cipher, still usable for some tasks... Max Power