sci.crypt archive

• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 23:35:01 CET
  • Re: Where is Tom? contini@matmail.com 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 23:30:24 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Gregory G Rose 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 23:03:51 CET
  • Re: Where is Tom? Tino Schwarze 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 22:52:53 CET
  • First quantum byte! Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 22:28:32 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 22:00:12 CET
  • Re: Where is Tom? Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 21:52:56 CET
  • Re: Fooling the phone tap nemo_outis 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 21:21:36 CET
  • Re: shuffling algorithm review websnarf@gmail.com 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 20:43:18 CET
  • Re: Fooling the phone tap Roger Schlafly 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 20:12:55 CET
  • Re: Where is Tom? mechmech 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 19:47:28 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation David Wagner 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 18:10:44 CET
  • Re: Fooling the phone tap nemo_outis 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 17:48:20 CET
  • Re: coupon collector problem Herman Rubin 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 15:28:45 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem David Eather 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 15:19:01 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem David Eather 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 12:56:12 CET
  • Re: Where is Tom? Andrew Swallow 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 12:33:05 CET
  • Fooling the phone tap Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 11:45:10 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 11:26:52 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Noticable 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 11:18:03 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function David Wagner 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 11:15:01 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function David Wagner 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 09:26:44 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation David Wagner 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 09:06:16 CET
  • A poem - Monarch the Butterfly - Papillon - the Priest (PAPPI) The Brigadier 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 07:53:31 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Francois Grieu 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 05:51:29 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system Paul Rubin 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 05:28:56 CET
  • Where is Tom? Luc The Perverse 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 04:50:49 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Len 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 02:22:51 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book Unruh 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 02:08:50 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book John Savard 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:29:59 CET
  • Re: coupon collector problem Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Someone can tell me which type of algorithm is this ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:28:35 CET
  • OpenSSL - Problem with i2d/d2i_ECPrivateKey Peter Pearson 
• Wed Nov 30 2005 - 00:16:52 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused anon1@sci.sci 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 23:50:25 CET
  • coupon collector problem yezi 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 22:35:15 CET
  • Someone can tell me which type of algorithm is this ? firefox78 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 21:19:08 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Gregory G Rose 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 19:04:52 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 18:58:18 CET
  • Re: Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography Gregg Townsend 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 18:57:42 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 18:48:47 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 18:48:14 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 18:46:35 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 18:35:31 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 17:44:12 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 17:44:08 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation megagurka 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 17:29:30 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 16:27:31 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation TC 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 15:37:14 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book Lefty Bigfoot 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 15:34:54 CET
  • Re: It is the Wedding Day ... Lefty Bigfoot 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 15:32:04 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem David Eather 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 15:29:09 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation megagurka 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 15:12:25 CET
  • Re: Double transposition cryptanalysis Stefan Krah 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 14:21:57 CET
  • Re: Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography ht9j35r02@sneakemail.com 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 13:51:05 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 13:33:31 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation TC 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 13:28:37 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation TC 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 13:02:25 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation megagurka 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 12:59:06 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem TC 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 12:19:30 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 09:21:20 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation TC 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 08:50:19 CET
  • Re: Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 07:32:44 CET
  • Re: Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography John A. Malley 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 06:25:26 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 05:46:39 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Stephen K. Gielda 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 05:26:41 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Francois Grieu 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 04:58:10 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Robert Mark White 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 03:42:01 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 02:38:00 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Mike Amling 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 02:31:14 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Mike Amling 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 02:29:59 CET
  • Re: PGP (Or GnuGP) under Java Will Dickson 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 02:01:37 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 02:00:14 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 00:55:12 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Milan VXdgsvt 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 00:28:41 CET
  • Re: Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography Paul Rubin 
• Tue Nov 29 2005 - 00:12:56 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Milan VXdgsvt 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:59:56 CET
  • An other form of eavesdropping on internet Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:50:15 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:48:11 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Gregory G Rose 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:43:09 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:25:39 CET
  • Re: Email List Encryption - Problem Gregory G Rose 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:09:26 CET
  • Re: Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography contini@matmail.com 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:07:26 CET
  • Email List Encryption - Problem Ari Silverstein 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:01:31 CET
  • Re: Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography Erik Corry 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 21:37:10 CET
  • Re: SRP with poor randomness on the host Unruh 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 21:32:32 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Gregory G Rose 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 21:26:27 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 21:25:30 CET
  • Re: SRP with poor randomness on the host Erik Corry 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 21:16:42 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function David Wagner 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 21:08:24 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 20:41:20 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Gregory G Rose 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 20:33:09 CET
  • Re: C-equivalence aware hash function Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 19:55:29 CET
  • C-equivalence aware hash function Francois Grieu 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 18:37:31 CET
  • Re: PGP (Or GnuGP) under Java Roedy Green 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 17:55:48 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Len 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 17:47:06 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 17:44:12 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 17:40:27 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 17:37:19 CET
  • Re: Primitive Polynomials Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 15:48:50 CET
  • Re: Encryption effect on a HD lifespan? Dan11 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 15:34:06 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation sillybanter@gmail.com 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 14:50:55 CET
  • Re: Encryption effect on a HD lifespan? Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 14:37:45 CET
  • Encryption effect on a HD lifespan? Dan11 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 14:29:53 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book John Savard 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 13:46:34 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation TC 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 12:53:52 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation David Eather 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 12:18:45 CET
  • Re: Looks like sci.crypt is being "moderated" David Eather 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 12:18:28 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Rob Warnock 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 07:24:34 CET
  • Re: Jos olet USAssa .. ala koskaan muuta takaisin Suomeen .... omat kokemukseni vuodesta 2002 Rev Turd Fredericks 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 07:02:35 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 01:48:47 CET
  • Re: Looks like sci.crypt is being "moderated" John E. Hadstate 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 01:21:49 CET
  • Re: PGP (Or GnuGP) under Java Paul Rubin 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 01:19:05 CET
  • PGP (Or GnuGP) under Java Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Nov 28 2005 - 00:19:58 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 nemo_outis 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 23:57:10 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused anon1@sci.sci 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 22:27:29 CET
  • Re: Jos olet USAssa .. ala koskaan muuta takaisin Suomeen .... omat kokemukseni vuodesta 2002 Juuso Hukkanen 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 22:16:28 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 21:36:09 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Unruh 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 20:53:00 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Brian McKeever 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 20:19:41 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 20:13:43 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 19:16:07 CET
  • Re: Java encryption implementation Gregory G Rose 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 17:37:11 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 Carsten Krueger 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 17:06:13 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 nemo_outis 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 17:01:06 CET
  • Java encryption implementation Lars Schoening 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 16:51:19 CET
  • Re: Looks like sci.crypt is being "moderated" Juuso Hukkanen 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 16:01:42 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Sander Vesik 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 15:55:03 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... laura fairhead 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 15:51:19 CET
  • New research papers available laura fairhead 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 14:56:54 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 14:31:11 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book Damien Wyart 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 11:17:10 CET
  • Re: Double transposition cryptanalysis Stewart Strait 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 07:26:04 CET
  • Re: Jos olet USAssa .. ala koskaan muuta takaisin Suomeen .... omat kokemukseni vuodesta 2002 Rev Turd Fredericks 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 02:14:50 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Pat Flannery 
• Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:27:54 CET
  • Re: Looks like sci.crypt is being "moderated" Jan Panteltje 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 23:36:38 CET
  • **theory-edge** mailing list vznuri@yahoo.com 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 22:10:37 CET
  • Truecrypt 4.1 released Kythe 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 21:41:59 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 20:47:51 CET
  • Re: SRP with poor randomness on the host Mike Amling 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 20:38:16 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 nemo_outis 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 20:29:14 CET
  • Re: SRP with poor randomness on the host karl malbrain 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 19:06:53 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Jorge R. Frank 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 18:34:46 CET
  • Re: Looks like sci.crypt is being "moderated" Phil Carmody 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 18:26:58 CET
  • Looks like sci.crypt is being "moderated" John Hadstate 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 16:52:17 CET
  • Re: Hi to the list! joes 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 12:05:45 CET
  • Jos olet USAssa .. ala koskaan muuta takaisin Suomeen .... omat kokemukseni vuodesta 2002 The Brigadier 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 11:56:19 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 Carsten Krueger 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 11:36:46 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 Paul Cooper 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 10:41:17 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book David Wagner 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 10:27:19 CET
  • Looking for book for 10y old about cryptography Marc Heusser 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 10:01:00 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 Noticable 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 10:00:14 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 Serge Paccalin 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 08:21:40 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 08:15:32 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system news 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 06:59:23 CET
  • Re: Truecrypt 4.1 nemo_outis 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 06:14:54 CET
  • Cryptanalysis Book Jeff Mott 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 06:08:41 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused John E. Hadstate 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 04:29:31 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system news 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 03:50:15 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 03:04:03 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused John Savard 
• Sat Nov 26 2005 - 00:33:24 CET
  • Online backups, Winzip 10 encryption strength, etc Wug 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 21:31:18 CET
  • Re: Hi to the list! John Savard 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 21:25:29 CET
  • portably encrypting a file system's partition, directory and/or file news 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 18:41:12 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system David Eather 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 16:00:53 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system John E. Hadstate 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 15:17:08 CET
  • Re: portably encrypting a file system Paul Rubin 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 15:06:21 CET
  • portably encrypting a file system onetitfemme 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 14:26:18 CET
  • Re: SRP with poor randomness on the host Paul Rubin 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 13:31:55 CET
  • SRP with poor randomness on the host Erik Corry 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 09:26:48 CET
  • It is the Wedding Day ... The Brigadier 
• Fri Nov 25 2005 - 03:38:29 CET
  • About knapsack! arrui_cheng 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 20:45:42 CET
  • Re: ECC-160 encryption of one packet of 127 byte David Wagner 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 20:04:47 CET
  • Re: Hi to the list! joes 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 19:23:43 CET
  • Re: Runtime binary encryption tools cascares@yahoo.com 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 19:11:43 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program cascares@yahoo.com 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 15:07:53 CET
  • FYI: error in RC6 sample implementation rc6-unop.c Harald Sauff 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 14:03:46 CET
  • Re: The Butterfly Cipher jsavard@ecn.ab.ca 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 13:44:36 CET
  • ECC-160 encryption of one packet of 127 byte Ulf Reiman 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 13:43:26 CET
  • ECC-160 encryption of one packet of 127 byte Ulf Reiman 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 11:06:19 CET
  • Hi to the list! info@elcomportal.de 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 08:58:15 CET
  • Re: The Butterfly Cipher Twittering One 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 04:16:54 CET
  • Re: The Butterfly Cipher contini@matmail.com 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 02:36:49 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Thu Nov 24 2005 - 02:17:27 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Phil Carmody 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 18:54:34 CET
  • Re: The Butterfly Cipher Unruh 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 16:30:37 CET
  • Re: Primitive Polynomials Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 15:27:33 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 15:11:59 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? vedaal 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 13:36:07 CET
  • The Butterfly Cipher John Savard 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 10:47:33 CET
  • Re: Primitive Polynomials Shevek 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 09:28:29 CET
  • Re: Double transposition cryptanalysis Stefan Krah 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 09:00:02 CET
  • The CIA is a liar -- Death squads, Osama bin Laden is alive, the war in Iraq and so on . The Brigadier 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 08:55:00 CET
  • Re: Question related to oblivious transfer Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 08:44:45 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program John H Meyers 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 03:33:57 CET
  • Re: Question related to oblivious transfer Twittering One 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 03:14:41 CET
  • Re: Question related to oblivious transfer Twittering One 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 01:26:56 CET
  • Question related to oblivious transfer cpptutor2000@yahoo.com 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 00:44:39 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? cryptonom 
• Wed Nov 23 2005 - 00:18:05 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? Mike Amling 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 23:51:19 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 20:12:43 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? vedaal 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 16:47:26 CET
  • Re: Question for Bill Unruh (OT) Bill Unruh 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 16:01:32 CET
  • Re: Primitive Polynomials esarad@gmail.com 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 15:13:45 CET
  • Question for Bill Unruh (OT) Timoleon 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 13:37:54 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 08:50:43 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 08:32:55 CET
  • Re: gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? Unruh 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 05:05:02 CET
  • Re: SHA1 Mike Amling 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 04:55:54 CET
  • Re: SHA1 Mike Amling 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 01:40:40 CET
  • gnupg /rsa question // can a public rsa key be reconstructed from a plaintext and ciphertext ? vedaal 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 01:19:14 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Tue Nov 22 2005 - 01:10:26 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 22:27:29 CET
  • Re: Provable security of independent encryptions David Wagner 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 21:19:58 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 20:50:10 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 20:44:47 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 20:33:24 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 20:30:11 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 20:08:34 CET
  • Re: Provable security of independent encryptions silentser@gmail.com 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 19:52:41 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:58:25 CET
  • Re: DES authentication Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:54:56 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:52:46 CET
  • Re: Provable security of independent encryptions David Wagner 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:47:06 CET
  • Re: SHA1 gkoreman@gmail.com 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:26:11 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Chris Card 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:23:48 CET
  • Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:20:31 CET
  • Re: Provable security of independent encryptions silentsergmail.com 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:05:57 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:03:29 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:03:12 CET
  • Re: Provable security of independent encryptions David Wagner 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 18:01:50 CET
  • Re: SHA1 David Wagner 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 17:12:22 CET
  • Re: Thanks, Joe david.florman@att.net 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 16:57:00 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Vernon Schryver 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 16:52:43 CET
  • Latex skill JiXian Yang 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 16:51:28 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Joe Peschel 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 16:42:13 CET
  • Re: Thanks, Joe Joe Peschel 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 16:17:04 CET
  • Provable security of independent encryptions silentsergmail.com 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 15:54:55 CET
  • Re: DES authentication friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 14:41:04 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 14:26:55 CET
  • Re: Runtime binary encryption tools SoftComplete 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 14:13:25 CET
  • Re: DES authentication Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 13:49:18 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Milan VXdgsvt 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 13:11:51 CET
  • Re: DES authentication friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 12:54:42 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 12:49:18 CET
  • Re: Primitive Polynomials Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 12:45:55 CET
  • Re: DES authentication Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 12:07:38 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 12:07:08 CET
  • Primitive Polynomials kishore.ln@gmail.com 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 12:02:36 CET
  • DES authentication friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 16:25:43 CET
  • Thanks, Joe david.florman@att.net 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 09:57:51 CET
  • Re: reading Public key certificates in Firefox asn1@rd.francetelecom.com 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 07:08:10 CET
  • Re: SHA1 Noticable 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 05:02:48 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 04:53:13 CET
  • Re: SHA1 John E. Hadstate 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 04:41:36 CET
  • Re: SHA1 Carlos Moreno 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 03:09:47 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 01:48:02 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 01:44:59 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 01:06:06 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 01:02:49 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 00:58:55 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 00:52:20 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 00:37:58 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Nov 21 2005 - 00:17:26 CET
  • Re: SHA1 John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 23:31:35 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 22:57:40 CET
  • SHA1 gkoreman@gmail.com 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 21:18:04 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 19:57:11 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 19:50:27 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 17:02:51 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT Spamless 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 15:49:38 CET
  • Re: Thanks, Joe Phil Carmody 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 15:05:26 CET
  • Re: Thanks, Joe John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 14:28:22 CET
  • Re: Thanks, Joe Phil Carmody 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 13:11:55 CET
  • Re: Elliptic curves in NFS otkachalka@hushmail.com 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 11:23:56 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT eugol 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 10:35:15 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT Valery Pryamikov 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 06:47:09 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Gregory G Rose 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 06:31:05 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 03:34:45 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 01:35:18 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT Spamless 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 00:15:15 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 00:13:03 CET
  • Re: Information Hiding 2006 CFP Phil Carmody 
• Sun Nov 20 2005 - 00:08:05 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 23:26:17 CET
  • Re: [1/3OT]Counting points on elliptic curves over F_p p prime Phil Carmody 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 19:09:23 CET
  • Re: alg. ident. need help John E. Hadstate 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 16:23:13 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft fredfelon 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 15:45:43 CET
  • Re: is it right 'k*P' in a elliptic curve E mod (n) ? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 15:42:31 CET
  • Re: [1/3OT]Counting points on elliptic curves over F_p p prime Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 13:47:15 CET
  • Re: Runtime binary encryption tools Zeljko Vrba 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 13:02:39 CET
  • Re: Hoe secure is openvpn in Linux? Jan Panteltje 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 11:29:36 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT eugol 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 11:27:31 CET
  • Re: Information Hiding 2006 CFP David Eather 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 10:56:49 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... laura fairhead 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 08:11:38 CET
  • is it right 'k*P' in a elliptic curve E mod (n) ? nome 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 07:10:00 CET
  • IMPORTANT: eurocrypt deadline on Monday NOON UTC (not midnight) Serge Vaudenay 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 06:58:52 CET
  • Call for Papers in Nanotechnology Journal nstcchat@yahoo.com 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 06:29:25 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Rick Hohensee 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 03:56:02 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Barnacle Bill 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 03:54:39 CET
  • Re: Runtime binary encryption tools TC 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 02:53:23 CET
  • Re: Runtime binary encryption tools Mike Amling 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 02:49:43 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT Unruh 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 02:33:34 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Mike Amling 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 01:39:28 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 00:56:21 CET
  • Re: Hoe secure is openvpn in Linux? Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sat Nov 19 2005 - 00:29:22 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused jonathan 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 23:17:50 CET
  • Re: [1/3OT]Counting points on elliptic curves over F_p p prime Oscar Reparaz 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 22:51:23 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused snidely 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 22:32:26 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused jsavard@ecn.ab.ca 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 21:20:31 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT eugol 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 21:03:29 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 20:59:22 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT eugol 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 20:47:18 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 20:45:36 CET
  • Re: Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 20:34:47 CET
  • Reduction from FACTORING to SQROOT eugol 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 20:29:40 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 20:01:25 CET
  • IMPORTANT: eurocrypt deadline on Monday NOON UTC (not midnight) Serge Vaudenay 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 19:53:53 CET
  • Runtime binary encryption tools EM 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 17:21:46 CET
  • Information Hiding 2006 CFP nfj@jjtc.com 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 17:14:13 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 12:52:22 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused John E. Hadstate 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 12:44:53 CET
  • Re: Karatsuba threshold for unequal operand lengths Ray 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 12:14:43 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Alain Fournier 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 08:31:51 CET
  • Re: [1/3OT]Counting points on elliptic curves over F_p p prime Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 08:20:03 CET
  • [1/3OT]Counting points on elliptic curves over F_p p prime nome 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 06:23:29 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Noticable 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 06:10:00 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 06:01:17 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 05:19:40 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 03:47:52 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Alain Fournier 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 02:26:08 CET
  • Re: alg. ident. need help Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 02:15:44 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 01:25:59 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 01:03:15 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 00:56:18 CET
  • Re: alg. ident. need help John E. Hadstate 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 00:33:20 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Fri Nov 18 2005 - 00:26:18 CET
  • alg. ident. need help blender@jaskom.pl 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 23:38:16 CET
  • INNOVATIONS J.T. 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 23:35:53 CET
  • Re: modifying ISAAC, a pseudo-random number generator Unruh 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 23:34:03 CET
  • Hoe secure is openvpn in Linux? Jan Panteltje 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 21:30:33 CET
  • Re: reading Public key certificates in Firefox Bodo Moeller 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 21:19:49 CET
  • Re: Elgamal encryption and CCA-1 Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 21:04:02 CET
  • Re: modifying ISAAC, a pseudo-random number generator Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 20:41:08 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 20:19:09 CET
  • Re: reading Public key certificates in Firefox James Muir 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 19:41:45 CET
  • Re: modifying ISAAC, a pseudo-random number generator Unruh 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 19:29:37 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Carsten Krueger 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 18:50:42 CET
  • Re: Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 18:45:55 CET
  • Re: The world's richest man cries .. the sea of change is coming ... Bill Gates is a cry baby ... FUCK BILL GATES .... Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 18:42:48 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 18:28:42 CET
  • Re: Elgamal encryption and CCA-1 jiangwu.mail@gmail.com 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 17:50:00 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 15:35:52 CET
  • Re: Base Conversion and Cryptology David A. Scott 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 15:02:30 CET
  • Elliptic curves in NFS otkachalka@hushmail.com 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 14:39:03 CET
  • modifying ISAAC, a pseudo-random number generator Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 09:22:19 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Noticable 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 08:34:57 CET
  • Re: Elgamal encryption and CCA-1 Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 06:12:34 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 04:37:47 CET
  • Re: reading Public key certificates in Firefox Mike Amling 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 04:21:43 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 02:30:39 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 02:02:04 CET
  • Elgamal encryption and CCA-1 jiangwu.mail@gmail.com 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 02:01:20 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 01:59:02 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Unruh 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 01:46:17 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program TC 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 01:16:20 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused John Halpenny 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 00:53:21 CET
  • Re: reading Public key certificates in Firefox Bodo Moeller 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 00:24:02 CET
  • Re: reading Public key certificates in Firefox Markus Jansson 
• Thu Nov 17 2005 - 00:09:40 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Twittering One 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 23:17:38 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 23:15:10 CET
  • reading Public key certificates in Firefox James Muir 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 22:47:14 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft laura fairhead 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 22:18:26 CET
  • Re: T. Kwon's hash functions for AMP in IEEE P1363.2 D Jablon 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 21:53:45 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Rick Hohensee 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 19:12:42 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 19:02:17 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 19:01:39 CET
  • Call For Papers: 2006 PDPTA, ICAI, SERP + more (28 joint conferences); Las Vegas, USA, June 2006 A. M. G. Solo 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 18:59:11 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 18:58:39 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 18:57:16 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 18:16:02 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 17:47:16 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft laura fairhead 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 17:23:23 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Len 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 16:40:34 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program bob 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 14:38:52 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 12:59:37 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Rev. 11D Meow! 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 12:47:02 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Robt. Miller 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 07:06:25 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program TC 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 07:02:12 CET
  • Re: Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes TC 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 06:01:12 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused Vernon Schryver 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 05:39:03 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 05:37:34 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 00:47:16 CET
  • Re: Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes dsfsdfsd 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 00:36:00 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Milan VXdgsvt 
• Wed Nov 16 2005 - 00:07:02 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft laura fairhead 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 23:59:53 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft laura fairhead 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 23:59:24 CET
  • Re: Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes Captain! 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 21:11:11 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Cristiano 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 20:27:46 CET
  • Re: Base Conversion and Cryptology John Savard 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 18:30:28 CET
  • Re: A Cryptologia Reference? Juuso Hukkanen 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 17:48:25 CET
  • Re: Free Commodities Are Abused John Savard 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 17:27:59 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 17:27:02 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Noticable 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 17:22:50 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Unruh 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 17:03:39 CET
  • Re: Looking for an encryption program Noticable 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 16:06:22 CET
  • Looking for an encryption program bob 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 15:52:42 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 15:38:03 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 14:45:15 CET
  • Re: Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes dsfsdfsd 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 14:43:26 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 13:24:11 CET
  • Re: Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes Captain! 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 04:39:35 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Tue Nov 15 2005 - 00:40:04 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 23:58:29 CET
  • T. Kwon's hash functions for AMP in IEEE P1363.2 karl malbrain 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 23:43:02 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Unruh 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 23:09:34 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Cristiano 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 22:58:10 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 19:37:55 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Scotius 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 19:00:52 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Bill Unruh 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 18:45:23 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 18:36:09 CET
  • A Cryptologia Reference? Jim Foyle 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 14:29:39 CET
  • Re: Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes Volker Hetzer 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 14:14:01 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 13:49:26 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 13:34:00 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state George Marsaglia 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 13:31:44 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 12:59:24 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 12:59:01 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 11:28:26 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Christian Siebert 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 09:55:34 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Paul Leyland 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 09:01:18 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:38:58 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:36:55 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:36:36 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:35:39 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:28:14 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Unruh 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:25:31 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Unruh 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:21:30 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 05:15:36 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Carlos Moreno 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 04:37:43 CET
  • Re: math question Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 04:19:56 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 03:51:42 CET
  • Re: math question Unruh 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 03:49:17 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Unruh 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 03:46:27 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 03:29:54 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 03:19:16 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Unruh 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 01:36:09 CET
  • Re: The world's richest man cries .. the sea of change is coming ... Bill Gates is a cry baby ... FUCK BILL GATES .... jitendra 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 01:21:07 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 00:53:15 CET
  • Re: math question Calad Sigilon 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 00:52:33 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 
• Mon Nov 14 2005 - 00:20:46 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 23:24:43 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Carlos Moreno 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 21:51:42 CET
  • Re: pseudo-random generator -- save state Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 21:41:24 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Colin Percival 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 21:37:58 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Chris Barts 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 21:08:46 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Rick Hohensee 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 20:58:52 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Scotius 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 20:58:25 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Scotius 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 20:51:58 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Rick Hohensee 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 20:47:16 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Rick Hohensee 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 20:45:50 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Robt. Miller 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 20:15:36 CET
  • Re: munitions - cryptographic software for linux Ashish Gulhati 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 20:07:40 CET
  • pseudo-random generator -- save state Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 19:49:15 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Paul Leyland 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 19:44:08 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Paul Leyland 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 19:37:47 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Paul Leyland 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 19:36:43 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Paul Leyland 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 19:33:27 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 19:17:31 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft qwerty 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 18:45:11 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Miguel O'Pastel 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 18:39:32 CET
  • Re: can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus Unruh 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 18:33:40 CET
  • can we find one-way trapdoor funcation family from the theory of calculus wangxahq@yahoo.com.cn 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 18:16:39 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Unruh 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 18:02:12 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Jan Panteltje 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 17:54:39 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 17:46:08 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Mxsmanic 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 17:42:15 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 17:31:00 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 17:02:15 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Robt. Miller 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 16:46:25 CET
  • ~ * Morning Wood Annunciates ... Twittering One 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 15:28:14 CET
  • Re: The world's richest man cries .. the sea of change is coming ... Bill Gates is a cry baby ... FUCK BILL GATES .... Dave Turner 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 15:04:48 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft David Eather 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 14:54:07 CET
  • Re: How does "xorstring[08]" work? David Eather 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 14:46:23 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Peter Fairbrother 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 14:43:32 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 14:19:11 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft fiend999 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 14:11:46 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 13:52:19 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 13:51:26 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 13:50:32 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 13:48:35 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 13:47:27 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Jan Panteltje 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 13:32:26 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 13:08:04 CET
  • Re: The world's richest man cries .. the sea of change is coming ... Bill Gates is a cry baby ... FUCK BILL GATES .... Ichinin 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 12:40:29 CET
  • Re: The world's richest man cries .. the sea of change is coming ... Bill Gates is a cry baby ... FUCK BILL GATES .... Dave Turner 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 12:02:26 CET
  • Again these people who have always been against me are after me .. I got some cat food in my mailbox again today on 11/13/2005 as I did in 1999 and 2004 ... it is a crime to put some cat food in people's mailboxes The Brigadier 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 11:55:30 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Rob Warnock 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 11:41:22 CET
  • Re: Authentication on both sides Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 10:50:57 CET
  • Authentication on both sides nagual.hsu@gmail.com 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 10:08:57 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Don Ocean 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 08:38:00 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Krusty's Mom 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 07:59:44 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 07:44:59 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Terrell 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 05:06:50 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 04:24:03 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Rick Hohensee 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 03:05:35 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft qwerty 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 02:51:33 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Roger Schlafly 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 01:39:18 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Ichinin 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 00:34:00 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 00:28:19 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 00:27:55 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Hurt 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 00:25:31 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Hurt 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 00:24:19 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Nov 13 2005 - 00:03:09 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... david.florman@att.net 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 22:45:46 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Mike Amling 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 21:32:18 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft Frank B. 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 20:38:31 CET
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft laura fairhead 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 19:26:43 CET
  • Re: How does "xorstring[08]" work? Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 15:39:03 CET
  • The world's richest man cries .. the sea of change is coming ... Bill Gates is a cry baby ... FUCK BILL GATES .... The Brigadier 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 14:23:02 CET
  • Re: How does "xorstring[08]" work? Twittering One 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 13:14:02 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 10:41:20 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 07:44:53 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Richard D. Latham 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 07:37:08 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored sillybanter@gmail.com 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 07:35:11 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Colin Percival 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 07:29:22 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 05:57:05 CET
  • Decrypt the code developer.varun@gmail.com 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 05:43:04 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 05:40:24 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Bob 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 02:50:32 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Peter Fairbrother 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 02:27:21 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Bryan Olson 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 01:09:12 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 00:40:00 CET
  • Re: every number has its own significance..... Steven Jones 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 00:26:01 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 00:21:00 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 00:16:52 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Ichinin 
• Sat Nov 12 2005 - 00:02:42 CET
  • every number has its own significance..... Andy 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 23:33:33 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 21:59:00 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? David Wagner 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 21:51:32 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 21:47:20 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 21:16:13 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Unruh 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 21:14:45 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Mike Amling 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 18:17:30 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Unruh 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 18:08:30 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Bob 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 18:02:11 CET
  • Re: Performance of best known Error Correcting Codes bland 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 17:17:02 CET
  • Re: Base Conversion and Cryptology Bryan Olson 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 15:44:22 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 15:37:59 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 15:03:43 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored sillybanter@gmail.com 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 14:03:09 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 12:37:11 CET
  • Performance of best known Error Correcting Codes mauro.guazzo@codework-it.com 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 12:32:24 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 10:35:09 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Don 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 10:31:14 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out John A. Malley 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 08:32:19 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 07:15:02 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 06:32:15 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Joe Peschel 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 06:31:35 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Joe Peschel 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 05:11:33 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Richard D. Latham 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 04:06:18 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Bryan Olson 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 03:57:53 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Mike Amling 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 03:08:31 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Milan VXdgsvt 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 02:49:41 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 02:19:55 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Gabriel Lear 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 01:44:56 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Unruh 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 00:25:29 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Mike Scott 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 00:18:35 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 00:10:09 CET
  • Re: Any of a set of keys for encryption Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 00:06:38 CET
  • Re: Any of a set of keys for encryption Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Nov 11 2005 - 00:03:04 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored contini@matmail.com 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 23:16:56 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 22:24:27 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Paul Rubin 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 22:14:15 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Pubkeybreaker 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 22:11:34 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Pubkeybreaker 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 22:00:13 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Ben Livengood 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 21:17:51 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 21:16:29 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 18:55:59 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Christian Siebert 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 18:31:38 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Unruh 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 18:04:40 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Pubkeybreaker 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 17:33:10 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Christian Siebert 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 15:14:28 CET
  • Re: RSA-640 factored Christian Siebert 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 13:30:26 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 13:27:41 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 12:16:55 CET
  • Re: Cryptography Scientist wanted in the Bay Area Sisyphus 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 10:52:24 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 10:29:08 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out BRG 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 10:13:00 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 09:43:44 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out John A. Malley 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 08:38:57 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 08:24:16 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 08:11:41 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 07:58:03 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 06:58:44 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out David Wagner 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 05:16:03 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Roger Schlafly 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 05:05:57 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out David Wagner 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 04:56:35 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? David Wagner 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 04:51:05 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 04:50:28 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 04:42:48 CET
  • Re: About the GHASH in GCM mode Chih-Hsu Yen 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 04:41:22 CET
  • Re: is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 04:25:39 CET
  • is CRC32 as good as it gets for 32 bits? Dave Turner 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 04:22:00 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Roger Schlafly 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 01:35:55 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out David Wagner 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 01:18:50 CET
  • Symmetric Encryption attacked by quantum computers? Don 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 01:15:37 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Ben Livengood 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 00:38:48 CET
  • Re: 3DES Decryption Technique - HELP!!! Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Nov 10 2005 - 00:10:55 CET
  • Re: Any of a set of keys for encryption glenlow@pixelglow.com 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 23:46:35 CET
  • Re: 3DES Decryption Technique - HELP!!! Thomas J. Boschloo 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 23:39:06 CET
  • Re: Base Conversion and Cryptology Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 23:35:00 CET
  • Re: munitions - cryptographic software for linux grisly 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 23:30:42 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Milan VXdgsvt 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 23:08:04 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Milan VXdgsvt 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 23:06:18 CET
  • Cryptography Scientist wanted in the Bay Area Jeff Winter 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 22:40:39 CET
  • Re: Any of a set of keys for encryption Mike Amling 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 20:21:43 CET
  • Re: DES CBC Mode with PKCS5 padding with OpenSSL Alan 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 20:02:14 CET
  • Re: Base Conversion and Cryptology David A. Scott 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 19:28:58 CET
  • Re: Life can have positive value dh@. 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 19:28:54 CET
  • RSA-640 factored Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 19:08:43 CET
  • Re: math question Peter Fairbrother 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 19:01:48 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 18:37:09 CET
  • Re: math question mm@nowhere.net 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 18:34:28 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 17:21:05 CET
  • Base Conversion and Cryptology Beau 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 17:13:31 CET
  • Re: math question Unruh 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 16:53:27 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 16:03:53 CET
  • Any of a set of keys for encryption glenlow@pixelglow.com 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 15:21:31 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 14:51:54 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Rubin 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 14:36:08 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 14:35:33 CET
  • Re: math question mm@nowhere.net 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 14:09:46 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Rubin 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 13:50:38 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 13:49:19 CET
  • Re: math question David Holland 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 11:11:50 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 10:39:09 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Peter Fairbrother 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 08:55:43 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 08:17:36 CET
  • Re: how to burn crypto algorithm onto chip?? Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 06:47:35 CET
  • Re: next-bit test Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Nov 09 2005 - 01:19:33 CET
  • DES CBC Mode with PKCS5 padding with OpenSSL Ocean 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 23:33:17 CET
  • How does "xorstring[08]" work? gladeisintriguing@yahoo.com 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 19:24:44 CET
  • Re: One-Way Accumulators Peter Pearson 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 17:32:30 CET
  • Re: SHA-1 and Bestcrypt Mike C. 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 13:53:55 CET
  • Re: SHA-1 and Bestcrypt David Eather 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 13:41:02 CET
  • One-Way Accumulators Jyothirmai 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 13:18:32 CET
  • SHA-1 and Bestcrypt Jaffa 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 10:50:00 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kelsey Bjarnason 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 07:43:34 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Ben Livengood 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 03:04:27 CET
  • Re: math question David Wagner 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 02:44:28 CET
  • Re: math question Peter Fairbrother 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 02:30:33 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out David Wagner 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 02:22:05 CET
  • Re: coding theory question serdar.boztas@ems.rmit.edu.au 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 00:52:54 CET
  • Re: math question David Wagner 
• Tue Nov 08 2005 - 00:46:25 CET
  • math question Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 23:11:52 CET
  • Re: coding theory question Gerry Myerson 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 23:05:33 CET
  • Re: coding theory question Bob 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 22:41:16 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 19:47:55 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out cryptonom 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 19:32:45 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 19:19:10 CET
  • coding theory question jeffconner50@yahoo.com 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 19:15:47 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 17:31:44 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out David Eather 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 17:25:59 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Ari Silversteinn 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 13:29:34 CET
  • bdes source drfremove@nber.org 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 13:16:04 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 13:07:13 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 12:57:01 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Paul Cooper 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 10:50:32 CET
  • none Fritz Wuehler 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 10:49:07 CET
  • Steganos details Martin Kahlert 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 07:26:29 CET
  • munitions - cryptographic software for linux Jacob Sheehy 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 05:36:53 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out cryptonom 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 04:18:57 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out nemo_outis 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 03:30:54 CET
  • Re: Symmetric Key Exchange/Authentication protocol. Jyothirmai 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 00:27:17 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out traveler 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 00:22:22 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out igneous 
• Mon Nov 07 2005 - 00:04:11 CET
  • Re: REPOST: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Ari Silversteinn 
• Sun Nov 06 2005 - 23:31:42 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out David Wagner 
• Sun Nov 06 2005 - 23:30:49 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out David Wagner 
• Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:15:02 CET
  • Re: TrueCrypt 4.0 Out Kelsey Bjarnason