sci.crypt archive

• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 23:51:27 CET
  • Re: Why include this in your reply? Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 23:05:39 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Mike Amling 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 22:09:40 CET
  • Re: NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! Dolly the Llama 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 21:45:36 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Matt 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 21:07:20 CET
  • Quadibloc Ciphers Illustrated Again John Savard 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 21:05:29 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? John Savard 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 19:35:53 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 18:55:17 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Unruh 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 17:55:34 CET
  • OT: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 17:05:42 CET
  • Re: NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! Art Deco 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 16:23:48 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 16:15:45 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Unruh 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 13:34:30 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 11:26:37 CET
  • Re: Safe password? giorgio.tani 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 10:19:53 CET
  • Re: Safe password? cryptonom 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 07:22:46 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Distribution of Differential and Linier Properties Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 06:42:30 CET
  • Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 05:11:58 CET
  • Re: NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 04:55:42 CET
  • Re: famous literature imipak 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 00:48:52 CET
  • Re: famous literature Bryan Olson 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 00:30:23 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Dec 31 2005 - 00:25:44 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Bryan Olson 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 20:00:54 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? Ichinin 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 18:32:55 CET
  • SIGS How to get the sieving polynoms smueller@s-mueller.ch 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 18:15:36 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Ichinin 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 17:19:29 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Unruh 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 15:30:56 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Neo 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 13:53:43 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 12:39:54 CET
  • Re: Safe password? John E. Hadstate 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 12:07:18 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 11:06:40 CET
  • Re: math question Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 05:44:13 CET
  • Call For Papers: June 26-29, 2006, joint conferences in computer science, computer engineering & applied computing; USA A. M. G. Solo 
• Fri Dec 30 2005 - 01:32:19 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Paul Rubin 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 23:40:07 CET
  • Re: NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 21:50:28 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 21:40:40 CET
  • NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! Lawrence ben' Franklin 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 21:24:28 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 18:03:03 CET
  • Re: Password length and bit number of encryption algorithm? giorgio.tani 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 18:02:55 CET
  • Re: Password length and bit number of encryption algorithm? giorgio.tani 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 17:11:17 CET
  • Have released a preliminary of NewsFleX newsreader that has encrypted anonymous communication via the headers. Jan Panteltje 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 14:58:47 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 13:33:41 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 13:17:02 CET
  • Re: Password length and bit number of encryption algorithm? John E. Hadstate 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 11:22:36 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? fermisoft@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 09:58:26 CET
  • Password length and bit number of encryption algorithm? paul_wary@yahoo.com 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 08:57:02 CET
  • Re: famous literature Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 08:36:28 CET
  • Re: famous literature jay25dec@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 07:25:34 CET
  • Re: famous literature Civitas Fenniae 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 05:05:24 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 02:06:18 CET
  • Re: famous literature qikink@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 02:00:03 CET
  • famous literature qikink@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 22:51:52 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Mxsmanic 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 22:42:49 CET
  • Re: Added hashes - LONG John A. Malley 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 22:19:42 CET
  • Re: rsa key generation question Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 19:03:16 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Unruh 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 18:59:51 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this Unruh 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 18:33:11 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this DAGwyn 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 18:14:32 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Chris Barts 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 17:33:56 CET
  • Re: Safe password? giorgio.tani 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 16:52:20 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this Carlos Moreno 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 16:45:41 CET
  • Re: rsa key generation question Carlos Moreno 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 16:05:15 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Unruh 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 15:58:00 CET
  • Re: How much secure it is ? What you think tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 14:16:27 CET
  • rsa key generation question kaskati2003@yahoo.com 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 12:58:31 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem to solve laicko 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 12:56:42 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 12:46:38 CET
  • How much secure it is ? What you think yadab 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 10:55:51 CET
  • Re: Safe password? paul_wary@yahoo.com 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 10:30:40 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem to solve David Wagner 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 10:27:27 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem to solve laicko 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 09:43:58 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Mika Bostrom 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 06:59:01 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem to solve David Wagner 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 06:02:32 CET
  • Re: Distribution of Differential and Linier Properties Ridwan 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 05:57:25 CET
  • Re: Is Mondex secure? Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 05:43:07 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Juuso Hukkanen 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 04:43:30 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem to solve laicko 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 03:51:50 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Ichinin 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 02:38:55 CET
  • Re: Is Mondex secure? (was: Re: Changes in laws about personal behaviours) Tim Smith 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 00:24:26 CET
  • Re: SHA Question tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 23:01:36 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Ichinin 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 20:44:01 CET
  • Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 20:12:42 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 20:10:55 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 20:06:37 CET
  • Is Mondex secure? (was: Re: Changes in laws about personal behaviours) SteveR 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 17:52:54 CET
  • Can you crack this chivalc@yahoo.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 17:11:28 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Mxsmanic 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 14:49:42 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox (OT - religious matters) David Eather 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 13:27:59 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Jan Panteltje 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 13:19:48 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Manuel Pancorbo Castro 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 11:19:41 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem to solve David Wagner 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 08:44:04 CET
  • Is it a hard problem to solve laicko 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 07:44:17 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? fermisoft@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 07:01:27 CET
  • Re: Distribution of Differential and Linier Properties tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 07:00:58 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 06:39:43 CET
  • Re: Information regarding LRW-AES tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 06:31:24 CET
  • Re: MC2 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 06:14:32 CET
  • Re: Use of CRC to verify encrypted data integrity tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 06:11:32 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 06:01:59 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 05:57:18 CET
  • DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? fermisoft@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 02:49:13 CET
  • Re: SHA Collision Resistance stan 
• Tue Dec 27 2005 - 01:03:29 CET
  • Re: SHA Collision Resistance Unruh 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 23:32:54 CET
  • Re: AES operation order Cryptic 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 23:21:55 CET
  • Re: AES operation order Cryptic 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 23:00:17 CET
  • Re: AES operation order Cryptic 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 22:34:56 CET
  • Re: AES operation order Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 22:34:10 CET
  • Re: AES operation order Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 22:20:35 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? David Wagner 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 21:32:41 CET
  • Re: Safe password? David Taylor 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 21:23:53 CET
  • Re: Safe password? paul_wary@yahoo.com 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 21:19:22 CET
  • AES operation order Cryptic 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 19:42:30 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 19:33:16 CET
  • Re: SHA Collision Resistance stan 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 19:30:49 CET
  • Re: SHA Collision Resistance stan 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 19:05:11 CET
  • Re: SHA Collision Resistance Peter Pearson 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 17:58:04 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Carlos Moreno 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 16:30:45 CET
  • Re: SHA Collision Resistance Unruh 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 15:22:02 CET
  • Re: Safe password? JP LR 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 13:56:02 CET
  • Re: Defeating keyloggers with encrypted one time passwords (a patent spoiler?) Ichinin 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 13:34:30 CET
  • Safenet iKey vs Aladdin eToken Siddhartha Jain 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 12:41:32 CET
  • SHA Collision Resistance stan 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 12:01:11 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox sandyinchina@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 09:30:24 CET
  • Crypto papers erdex 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 08:05:14 CET
  • SHA Question Neo 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 07:01:46 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Unruh 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 05:18:04 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Dave Thompson 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 05:12:16 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Mxsmanic 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 05:10:26 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Mxsmanic 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 04:32:15 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Mxsmanic 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 04:30:08 CET
  • Re: Use of CRC to verify encrypted data integrity Unruh 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 03:17:57 CET
  • Re: Defeating keyloggers with encrypted one time passwords (a patent spoiler?) Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 02:44:36 CET
  • Re: Use of CRC to verify encrypted data integrity David Wagner 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 02:11:29 CET
  • Re: Use of CRC to verify encrypted data integrity Rocking 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 01:31:23 CET
  • Use of CRC to verify encrypted data integrity Unknown 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 01:06:26 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 01:02:22 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Dec 26 2005 - 00:35:43 CET
  • Re: Defeating keyloggers with encrypted one time passwords (a patent spoiler?) Ichinin 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 22:04:15 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Carlos Moreno 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 22:03:54 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Unruh 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 22:01:41 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Unruh 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 20:53:24 CET
  • Re: Safe password? David Taylor 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 20:31:11 CET
  • Re: Safe password? JP LR 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 17:08:29 CET
  • Re: Safe password? Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 14:43:54 CET
  • Safe password? paul_wary@yahoo.com 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 12:12:34 CET
  • Re: Distribution of Differential and Linier Properties - A non-definative answer David Eather 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 10:12:10 CET
  • Re: Distribution of Differential and Linier Properties Ridwan 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 09:54:59 CET
  • Distribution of Differential and Linier Properties Ridwan 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 06:15:21 CET
  • Re: Redundancy Required to Overcome Data Loss TC 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 02:45:53 CET
  • Re: Redundancy Required to Overcome Data Loss Paul Rubin 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 02:16:10 CET
  • Re: Redundancy Required to Overcome Data Loss TC 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 00:08:14 CET
  • Re: Redundancy Required to Overcome Data Loss Paul Rubin 
• Sun Dec 25 2005 - 00:01:26 CET
  • Redundancy Required to Overcome Data Loss TC 
• Sat Dec 24 2005 - 21:02:27 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Twittering One 
• Sat Dec 24 2005 - 15:26:05 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Sat Dec 24 2005 - 15:00:30 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Unruh 
• Sat Dec 24 2005 - 06:52:50 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Paul Rubin 
• Sat Dec 24 2005 - 06:49:20 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Peter Fairbrother 
• Sat Dec 24 2005 - 04:25:49 CET
  • Call for Papers: FCS'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) A. M. G. Solo 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 23:56:06 CET
  • Re: Questions on SHA-1 Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 21:36:10 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 19:30:30 CET
  • Re: Questions on SHA-1 bren[at]gillatt.org 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 19:13:13 CET
  • Re: MC2 Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 18:59:09 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles vedaal 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 17:51:54 CET
  • Re: OEF curve WiteG 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 15:57:40 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles vedaal 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 15:34:42 CET
  • OpenSSL 0.9.8 Carlos Moreno 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 15:28:58 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 15:07:14 CET
  • Re: Information regarding LRW-AES herald 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 14:42:31 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles herald 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 14:36:47 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:59:21 CET
  • DES: analyzing ciphertexts for plaintexts whose difference is known axellec@netcourrier.com 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:53:15 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:45:19 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) David Eather 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:27:26 CET
  • Re: OEF curve Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:26:34 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:16:04 CET
  • Re: OEF curve Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:12:42 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 13:02:39 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 12:43:41 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 12:08:06 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 11:44:22 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 10:38:32 CET
  • Re: NULL IV in CBC axellec@netcourrier.com 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 10:37:42 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 10:27:08 CET
  • Re: Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 09:44:49 CET
  • Memorisable/handwriteable/typeable key styles Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 08:26:06 CET
  • Re: OEF curve tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 00:37:53 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) aie93 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 23:25:44 CET
  • Re: MC2 Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 23:11:14 CET
  • Re: NULL IV in CBC David Wagner 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 23:08:44 CET
  • Re: NULL IV in CBC D. J. Bernstein 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 22:50:04 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net Paul Rubin 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 22:47:17 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net paurobins@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 22:22:48 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 23 2005 - 02:49:24 CET
  • Re: The Enemy of the State --- a good movie and so close to the truth .. never trust the government -- never trust George W. Bush ... anonymous 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 21:48:57 CET
  • Re: NULL IV in CBC David Wagner 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 21:47:18 CET
  • Re: NULL IV in CBC David Wagner 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 21:42:43 CET
  • Re: AES runs on crypto++ and on Java Framework JCE with bouncy castle, but i can exchange the encrypted text Gregory G Rose 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 20:20:47 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 20:10:39 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Jiminy 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 19:02:49 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Dennis Knorr 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 18:28:09 CET
  • Re: AES runs on crypto++ and on Java Framework JCE with bouncy castle, but i can not exchange the encrypted text BRG 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 18:12:25 CET
  • OEF curve WiteG 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 18:09:07 CET
  • AES runs on crypto++ and on Java Framework JCE with bouncy castle, but i can not exchange the encrypted text Jo 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 18:03:34 CET
  • Re: NULL IV in CBC axellec@netcourrier.com 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 17:58:53 CET
  • AES runs on crypto++ and on Java Framework JCE with bouncy castle, but i can exchange the encrypted text Jo 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 17:24:31 CET
  • Re: NULL IV in CBC Peter Pearson 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 17:14:05 CET
  • Re: www.easymeetu.com °e§A¨C¤ë°ª¹FHK$3150©Î¥H¤W²{ª÷¦^ÃØ Kristian Damgaard 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 16:51:50 CET
  • Re: Information regarding LRW-AES axellec@netcourrier.com 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 16:41:50 CET
  • Information regarding LRW-AES hagaiy@yahoo.com 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 14:54:24 CET
  • NULL IV in CBC axellec@netcourrier.com 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 09:49:41 CET
  • Re: combining LFSRs for long cycle and "quick changes" David Wagner 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 09:12:09 CET
  • Re: combining LFSRs for long cycle and "quick changes" Eli Bendersky 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 08:19:16 CET
  • Re: combining LFSRs for long cycle and "quick changes" Gregory G Rose 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 08:08:05 CET
  • Re: combining LFSRs for long cycle and "quick changes" David Wagner 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 07:38:18 CET
  • combining LFSRs for long cycle and "quick changes" Eli Bendersky 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 01:05:38 CET
  • Re: MC2 Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 00:06:04 CET
  • Re: Questions on SHA-1 Paul Rubin 
• Thu Dec 22 2005 - 00:04:00 CET
  • Re: Questions on SHA-1 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 23:48:40 CET
  • Questions on SHA-1 Steven Jones 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 22:21:17 CET
  • Re: Another Site with FIALKA Pictures joes 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 22:09:46 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox Paul Rubin 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 21:51:16 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Tino Schwarze 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 21:51:15 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 21:33:32 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net paurobins@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 20:34:41 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 19:52:01 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Paul Leyland 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 19:41:14 CET
  • Re: Launch of CryptoDox David Wagner 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 19:36:36 CET
  • Launch of CryptoDox Anuj 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 17:20:34 CET
  • Re: double-DES Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 16:45:11 CET
  • The U.S. Intelligence Community Reform - 1997 -- the program was unsuccessful -- "Valeries" of the world -- VALE = LIE -- RIE -- A lot of lies about the life = VALERIE-- Anchorage -- Why would I have ever moved to Alaska from Miami? The Brigadier 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 16:23:42 CET
  • Call for Papers: GCA'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) A. M. G. Solo 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 15:42:08 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 14:57:58 CET
  • Re: streaming videos TC 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 13:25:13 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) David Eather 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 12:46:32 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) aie93 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 11:47:32 CET
  • Re: streaming videos David Holland 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 09:41:21 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? jEL 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 07:30:50 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 07:27:15 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 03:21:22 CET
  • Re: bank electronic infrastructure and public-key cryptography christo 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 02:39:25 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Dec 21 2005 - 00:14:48 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) aie93 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 23:06:50 CET
  • Naval Enigma 4-rotor [en|de]cipherment example Ted Rolle 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 22:29:21 CET
  • Re: double-DES Paul Rubin 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 22:25:47 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Bryan Olson 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 22:24:08 CET
  • Re: Asymmetric vs symmetric John Savard 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 21:10:48 CET
  • Re: double-DES Larry 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 20:40:01 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Gregory G Rose 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 20:20:31 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Peter Pearson 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 19:58:49 CET
  • Re: Addition Law and K*P for Montgomery-form elliptic Curves Peter Pearson 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 19:37:55 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Andrew Swallow 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:46:42 CET
  • Re: double-DES tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:39:05 CET
  • double-DES Larry 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:31:42 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:26:23 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:24:48 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:21:29 CET
  • Re: Addition Law and K*P for Montgomery-form elliptic Curves tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:11:52 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers karl malbrain 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 16:41:53 CET
  • Addition Law and K*P for Montgomery-form elliptic Curves ¬a\\/b 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 14:27:03 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) David Eather 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 14:23:23 CET
  • Re: MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) Will Dickson 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 14:10:32 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Tino Schwarze 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 12:52:33 CET
  • Re: Asymmetric vs symmetric Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 12:36:59 CET
  • Re: Asymmetric vs symmetric Civitas Fenniae 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 11:38:32 CET
  • Re: Asymmetric vs symmetric Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 11:17:47 CET
  • Caesar cipher and Enid Blyton ? tiruxa 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 09:19:04 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? giorgio.tani 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 09:11:40 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Phil Carmody 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 09:05:57 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Phil Carmody 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 08:58:50 CET
  • Re: Asymmetric vs symmetric Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 08:49:27 CET
  • Asymmetric vs symmetric hassan.jameel@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 08:34:45 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 03:57:32 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 03:31:34 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Michael Fork 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 03:29:19 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Michael Fork 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 02:00:25 CET
  • MD5P (Variable length hash, kindof) aie93 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 01:26:41 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Mark Wooding 
• Tue Dec 20 2005 - 01:24:25 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Phil Carmody 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 23:24:51 CET
  • Re: bank electronic infrastructure and public-key cryptography Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 23:09:28 CET
  • bank electronic infrastructure and public-key cryptography christo 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 21:26:24 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 21:11:08 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers karl malbrain 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 21:05:32 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers karl malbrain 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:53:47 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:45:55 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:44:07 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:35:43 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Michael Fork 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:35:31 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers karl malbrain 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:29:18 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mike Amling 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:26:13 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Mike Amling 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:25:20 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Mike Amling 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:18:55 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 20:01:33 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 19:30:44 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers karl malbrain 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 19:19:23 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers BRG 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 19:19:15 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Tino Schwarze 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 19:09:38 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers BRG 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 18:41:49 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Michael Fork 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 18:29:13 CET
  • Re: Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 17:58:21 CET
  • Generating Prepaid Card Numbers Michael Fork 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 14:51:06 CET
  • Re: The Enemy of the State --- a good movie and so close to the truth .. never trust the government -- never trust George W. Bush ... Christopher Helms 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 12:16:40 CET
  • Re: The Enemy of the State --- a good movie and so close to the truth .. never trust the government -- never trust George W. Bush ... MoD 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 10:21:06 CET
  • The Enemy of the State --- a good movie and so close to the truth .. never trust the government -- never trust George W. Bush ... The Brigadier 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 09:31:35 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 06:25:35 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? David Wagner 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 06:11:35 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 05:36:31 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Tim Smith 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 05:21:35 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 05:20:36 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Tim Smith 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 05:18:48 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 05:12:58 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 05:00:55 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Tim Smith 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 04:32:35 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 04:28:36 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 04:26:13 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Tim Smith 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 02:36:59 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Mark Wooding 
• Mon Dec 19 2005 - 01:11:53 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Juuso Hukkanen 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 23:50:30 CET
  • Re: MC2 Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 22:58:13 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Bodo Moeller 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 22:35:16 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 Paul Rubin 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 22:27:42 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 jiminyorama@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 22:06:12 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 jiminyorama@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 21:41:42 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 21:10:42 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? David Wagner 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 21:07:23 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? David Wagner 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:55:07 CET
  • Re: MC2 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:53:21 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:52:44 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 jiminyorama@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:52:22 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:45:43 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 jiminyorama@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:37:16 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:24:28 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? David Wagner 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 20:16:56 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 19:55:13 CET
  • Re: What's wrong with this RC4? David Wagner 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 19:49:40 CET
  • What's wrong with this RC4? Andrew Pogrebennyk 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 18:23:06 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 17:09:08 CET
  • Re: MC2 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 17:04:55 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 17:00:13 CET
  • Re: MC2 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 16:57:31 CET
  • Re: MC2 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 16:45:06 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 16:40:19 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 16:35:24 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 16:29:18 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 16:27:52 CET
  • Re: MC2 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 16:18:35 CET
  • Re: MC2 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 14:13:51 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 14:07:58 CET
  • Re: MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 13:46:01 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Tino Schwarze 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 06:04:15 CET
  • Re: explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 05:59:25 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Peter Fairbrother 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 05:14:05 CET
  • Re: Character Code Generator (already 3 of 8 code) Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 03:29:33 CET
  • explain to an idiot why gpg output slates towards 0xd5 jiminyorama@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 02:25:22 CET
  • Re: Character Code Generator (already 3 of 8 code) Paul Rubin 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 02:00:20 CET
  • Character Code Generator (already 3 of 8 code) GoCoogs 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 00:09:25 CET
  • Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) A. M. G. Solo 
• Sun Dec 18 2005 - 00:04:32 CET
  • Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) A. M. G. Solo 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 22:10:51 CET
  • Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 21:42:31 CET
  • Re: Cryptographic file system under linux that ACTUALLY WORKS Tris Orendorff 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 20:58:57 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? David Wagner 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 20:50:46 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? David Wagner 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 17:45:15 CET
  • Re: MC2 Mike Amling 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 16:26:40 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 14:20:46 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? cryptonewbie 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 12:29:59 CET
  • Re: MC2 Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 12:22:54 CET
  • Re: Bruce Schneier at New York with Tom Ridge -- the U.S. Homeland Security -- so George W. Bush --> Tom Ridge --> Bruce Schneier --> Markku J. Saarelainen (a poor former immigrant to the U.S.A.) -- funny -- December 1995 and my communications with Bruce -- Bruce has risen to the high-level in the U.S. Homeland Security Infrastructure -- 10 years has passed .. Allen L. Barker 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 12:19:13 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Mark Wooding 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 11:18:47 CET
  • MC2 Miroslav Stampar 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 10:31:40 CET
  • Bruce Schneier at New York with Tom Ridge -- the U.S. Homeland Security -- so George W. Bush --> Tom Ridge --> Bruce Schneier --> Markku J. Saarelainen (a poor former immigrant to the U.S.A.) -- funny -- December 1995 and my communications with Bruce -- Bruce has risen to the high-level in the U.S. Homeland Security Infrastructure -- 10 years has passed .. The Brigadier 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 09:39:10 CET
  • Re: DRM was Re: streaming videos Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 08:11:19 CET
  • Re: DRM was Re: streaming videos hassan.jameel@gmail.com 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 04:48:36 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? David Wagner 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 04:36:39 CET
  • UofMich Quantun Computer Jim Choate 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 04:35:12 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Peter Fairbrother 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 02:38:57 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? David Wagner 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 02:36:29 CET
  • DRM was Re: streaming videos Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 02:35:27 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 02:04:40 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Juuso Hukkanen 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 01:41:07 CET
  • Re: breaking elgamal possible? cryptonewbie 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 00:44:06 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Juuso Hukkanen 
• Sat Dec 17 2005 - 00:28:20 CET
  • breaking elgamal possible? cryptonewbie 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 23:43:08 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Peter Fairbrother 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 20:44:30 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 20:06:13 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 20:04:34 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 19:12:40 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Ari Silverstein 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 19:11:49 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Anne & Lynn Wheeler 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 19:09:23 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering Ari Silverstein 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 18:50:20 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 18:13:47 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Mike Amling 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 16:57:07 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 16:08:55 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 15:36:14 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 14:16:03 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 13:06:05 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 12:16:38 CET
  • Re: streaming videos Ian Stirling 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 09:51:48 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 09:33:11 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 09:15:20 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Stefan Tillich 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 08:51:58 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 06:32:13 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 06:30:59 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 04:54:17 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Juuso Hukkanen 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 02:42:16 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Paul Rubin 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 02:01:53 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 01:29:41 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 01:19:53 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering christo 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 01:01:25 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 00:29:38 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 00:22:06 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Fri Dec 16 2005 - 00:05:57 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 23:51:07 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 22:22:26 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 22:07:09 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 21:48:05 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 20:53:37 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 19:22:28 CET
  • Re: Sex advice from cryptographers Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 19:04:47 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 18:02:34 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 18:01:58 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Paul Rubin 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 16:54:50 CET
  • Re: Sex advice from cryptographers Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 16:53:32 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 15:45:09 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 15:43:53 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Ari Silverstein 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 13:13:11 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 13:10:15 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 12:59:13 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 11:25:50 CET
  • Re: streaming videos Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 10:38:33 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 10:19:35 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net herald 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 09:54:27 CET
  • ESIGN signature scheme Barath Raghavan 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 09:32:48 CET
  • streaming videos hassan.jameel@gmail.com 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 08:57:05 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. David Wagner 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 07:55:33 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. John A. Malley 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 07:54:48 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. John A. Malley 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 07:26:33 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 06:51:01 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 06:50:12 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 06:49:08 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 05:42:22 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 04:31:05 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Andrew Swallow 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 04:00:32 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Andrew Swallow 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 02:20:58 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 02:08:13 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 01:12:16 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? laura fairhead 
• Thu Dec 15 2005 - 00:42:01 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 22:46:06 CET
  • ~ * A Morning Wood Public Privet Ledge ... mournenwould@aol.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 22:21:39 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 22:12:11 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. David Wagner 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 22:01:17 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 21:45:15 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 21:31:08 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Luc The Perverse 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 21:30:27 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 21:26:09 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. David Wagner 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 20:37:40 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Juuso Hukkanen 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 20:34:04 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 20:06:19 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering Ari Silverstein 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 19:47:21 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 19:45:21 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 19:29:07 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Juuso Hukkanen 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 18:45:19 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. John A. Malley 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 18:25:08 CET
  • Re: problem in factoring a number alpertron@hotmail.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 18:15:29 CET
  • Re: How to estimate a negligible value? silentser@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 18:09:05 CET
  • Re: problem in factoring a number bachimanchi@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 17:53:31 CET
  • Re: Bestcrypt, Truecrypt or other - what should I use? nemo_outis 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 17:45:45 CET
  • Re: How to estimate a negligible value? Paul Rubin 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 17:25:46 CET
  • Bestcrypt, Truecrypt or other - what should I use? Przemyslaw Jaskierski 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 17:16:06 CET
  • How to estimate a negligible value? silentser@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 16:55:00 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Joe Peschel 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 15:57:59 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net Dan Evans 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 13:49:09 CET
  • EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 13:41:25 CET
  • Re: First quantum byte! David Eather 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 13:15:38 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Richard Herring 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 12:23:33 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Andrew Swallow 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 08:22:10 CET
  • equations for point addition bachimanchi@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 08:01:48 CET
  • Re: Autokey ben.arba 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 07:11:04 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Joe Peschel 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 05:25:50 CET
  • Re: problem in factoring a number Peter L. Montgomery 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 04:20:13 CET
  • Re: I need some information vinodhini.vijay@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 02:58:23 CET
  • problem in factoring a number bachimanchi@gmail.com 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 00:28:31 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering Luc The Perverse 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 00:25:04 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Luc The Perverse 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 00:19:07 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 00:08:29 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Mike Amling 
• Wed Dec 14 2005 - 00:08:26 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 23:55:41 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. David Wagner 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 23:37:41 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Juuso Hukkanen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 23:30:35 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Juuso Hukkanen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 23:28:20 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 23:03:54 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 22:54:43 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Mike Amling 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 22:50:33 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Phil Carmody 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 22:23:16 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 22:06:36 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Phil Carmody 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 21:45:48 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net paurobins@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 21:31:14 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 21:30:11 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 21:28:43 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 21:25:34 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net moros 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 21:05:05 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net Peter Pearson 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 20:45:06 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. cryptonom 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 20:42:49 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 20:26:32 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. David Wagner 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 20:14:41 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 18:38:29 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net cpscsam@gmail.com 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 18:26:28 CET
  • Re: Private Post Juuso Hukkanen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 18:17:08 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 17:40:15 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 17:20:15 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Juuso Hukkanen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 17:03:10 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Juuso Hukkanen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 16:59:56 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering David Eather 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 16:45:18 CET
  • a new solution cryptoman101011 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 15:05:08 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 14:02:47 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 13:41:00 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 13:16:04 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 12:18:06 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 11:38:55 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Casper H.S. Dik 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 11:33:18 CET
  • The strenght of the U.S.A. was shown on 9-11-2001, when 20 bums flew planes to those WTC towers causing millions of 911 calls ... 20 PUMMIA VOITTI YHDYSVALLAT SYYSKUUN 11 PAIVANA VUONNA 2001 .... 200 vs. 5 The Brigadier 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 11:15:07 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Colin Percival 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 11:04:36 CET
  • Re: Private Post Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 10:00:01 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net moros 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 09:19:33 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Phil Carmody 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 08:45:26 CET
  • Re: Is IDEA insecure? (wondering why it was in 2.2 cryptoloop not 2.6) Ian Stirling 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 08:25:36 CET
  • Autokey ben.arba 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 08:23:52 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Joe Peschel 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 05:37:39 CET
  • Re: Is IDEA insecure? (wondering why it was in 2.2 cryptoloop not 2.6) Christopher Browne 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 05:34:04 CET
  • Re: Is IDEA insecure? (wondering why it was in 2.2 cryptoloop not 2.6) Paul Rubin 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 05:25:28 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Andrew Swallow 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 05:15:49 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 04:58:20 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Joe Peschel 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 04:55:54 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. David Wagner 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 04:40:09 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 04:32:03 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. John E. Hadstate 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 04:17:49 CET
  • Re: Is Ari a Troll? christo 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 03:58:31 CET
  • Re: I need some information christo 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 03:55:28 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Ari Silverstein 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 03:50:44 CET
  • Is IDEA insecure? (wondering why it was in 2.2 cryptoloop not 2.6) Ian Stirling 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 03:44:23 CET
  • Re: Private Post Ian Stirling 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 03:03:39 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering christo 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 02:29:45 CET
  • Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US (leaving topic) Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Added hashes. Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 02:07:03 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 01:47:29 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 01:39:59 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 01:05:12 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 00:59:20 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Phil Carmody 
• Tue Dec 13 2005 - 00:28:15 CET
  • Off-topic, horrible humor, and I pick on Tom Re: Sex advice from cryptographers Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 23:38:07 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 23:28:47 CET
  • Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US (leaving topic) cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 22:25:05 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Mike Amling 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 22:24:06 CET
  • Re: Defeating keyloggers with encrypted one time passwords (a patent spoiler?) Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 22:16:31 CET
  • Re: http://phash.net Sam 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 22:04:31 CET
  • http://phash.net moros 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 21:53:01 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 20:58:22 CET
  • Re: Rather Newb-ish Question ncf 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 20:31:39 CET
  • Re: Defeating keyloggers with encrypted one time passwords (a patent spoiler?) Sam 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 20:29:55 CET
  • Re: Private Post Gregory G Rose 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 20:26:46 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Colin Percival 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 20:21:59 CET
  • Re: Private Post Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 19:46:12 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 19:32:40 CET
  • forgery attack on the Schnorr signature scheme gaozhengyi@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 19:30:44 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 19:28:16 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering nemo_outis 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 18:57:15 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Joe Peschel 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 18:26:38 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 18:25:21 CET
  • Private Post damien.bidmead@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:59:34 CET
  • Re: First quantum byte! David Eather 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:50:53 CET
  • Re: Sex advice from cryptographers John Savard 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:28:52 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:16:12 CET
  • Re: Where is Tom? Ari Silverstein 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:12:26 CET
  • Re: First quantum byte! Ari Silverstein 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:09:05 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering Ari Silverstein 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:07:37 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering Ari Silverstein 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:05:39 CET
  • Re: cyber money laundering Ari Silverstein 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 17:04:16 CET
  • Re: Illegal activities, encrypted files and police Ari Silverstein 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 16:15:18 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 16:06:23 CET
  • Re: Defeating keyloggers with encrypted one time passwords (a patent spoiler?) Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 15:47:59 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Tino Schwarze 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 15:36:38 CET
  • Re: Cryptographic file system under linux that ACTUALLY WORKS Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 14:37:42 CET
  • Re: I need some information duoduolei@163.com 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 13:57:15 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Ian Stirling 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 13:40:37 CET
  • Re: Length of encrypted text - please help Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 13:30:28 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 13:28:17 CET
  • Length of encrypted text - please help almurph@altavista.com 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 12:49:04 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Gabriel Lear 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 12:48:04 CET
  • I need some information Elena González 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 12:48:02 CET
  • I need some information Elena González 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 12:31:22 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Tino Schwarze 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 12:25:47 CET
  • Re: Sex advice from cryptographers Phil Carmody 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 11:50:26 CET
  • Re: Rather Newb-ish Question Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 11:28:52 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Mark Wooding 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 10:59:23 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Phil Carmody 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 10:57:37 CET
  • Sex advice from cryptographers Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 10:55:46 CET
  • Re: Rather Newb-ish Question Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 10:40:34 CET
  • Re: Is Ari a Troll? Sam 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 10:37:14 CET
  • Re: Rather Newb-ish Question Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 10:26:31 CET
  • Rather Newb-ish Question ncf 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 10:18:07 CET
  • Re: Defeating keyloggers with encrypted one time passwords (a patent spoiler?) Sam 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 09:37:49 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 09:07:44 CET
  • Re: Suitable key Algorithm for 256 bits symmetric block cipher?? Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US (leaving topic) Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 09:03:26 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. duoduolei@163.com 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 08:45:20 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 08:21:10 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Colin Percival 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 07:43:18 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 07:24:23 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. cryptonom 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 06:49:25 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. Ian Stirling 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 06:25:20 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Colin Percival 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 04:15:15 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 02:08:54 CET
  • Re: Variations on Shamir secret sharing jimbo234joens@hotmail.com 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 01:27:37 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Paul Rubin 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 01:18:06 CET
  • Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 01:12:48 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 01:10:03 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 00:54:38 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Paul Cooper 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 00:10:08 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Dec 12 2005 - 00:03:54 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 21:15:16 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 21:00:29 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 20:58:44 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 20:52:59 CET
  • Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US cryptonom 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 20:24:04 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 20:20:21 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 20:14:39 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 20:12:38 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 20:10:44 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? cryptonom 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 19:35:29 CET
  • Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US Welda 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 15:12:02 CET
  • Re: Suitable key Algorithm for 256 bits symmetric block cipher?? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 15:10:51 CET
  • Re: Suitable key Algorithm for 256 bits symmetric block cipher?? John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 14:20:13 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Milan VXdgsvt 
• Thu Dec 29 2005 - 01:41:15 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 21:16:32 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 21:04:09 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 20:40:36 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 15:38:09 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? clark 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 14:50:40 CET
  • Re: Illegal activities, encrypted files and police clark 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 10:10:10 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 10:01:14 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 09:50:01 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Wed Dec 28 2005 - 09:35:12 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? herald 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 14:19:14 CET
  • Finding a jump index Sarad AV 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 14:15:07 CET
  • Re: risk due to pre-generated password tables? duoduolei@163.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 13:10:36 CET
  • Suitable key Algorithm for 256 bits symmetric block cipher?? Peter 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 12:11:20 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 10:44:03 CET
  • Re: risk due to pre-generated password tables? Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Added hashes. Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 07:28:58 CET
  • Re: PGP Lame question vedaal 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 07:17:10 CET
  • Re: risk due to pre-generated password tables? Gregory G Rose 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 06:35:13 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 06:34:01 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 02:11:54 CET
  • Re: Another Site with FIALKA Pictures John Savard 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 01:55:22 CET
  • Re: Added hashes. John E. Hadstate 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 01:06:05 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 00:39:17 CET
  • Added hashes. Ian Stirling 
• Sun Dec 11 2005 - 00:37:08 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Milan VXdgsvt 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 23:46:56 CET
  • Re: risk due to pre-generated password tables? Mike Amling 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 23:11:21 CET
  • Re: First quantum byte! Ken S. Tucker 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 22:08:30 CET
  • Re: challenge-response in 32 bits, tradeoffs Mike Amling 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 22:07:18 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? BRG 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 21:51:40 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? BRG 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 21:50:35 CET
  • Re: risk due to pre-generated password tables? Unruh 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 21:46:14 CET
  • Re: Another Site with FIALKA Pictures joes 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 21:21:52 CET
  • Has the riddle been solved? Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 18:48:48 CET
  • Re: Cryptanalysis Book Joe Peschel 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 18:38:38 CET
  • Re: First quantum byte! Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 18:35:50 CET
  • Re: risk due to pre-generated password tables? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 18:33:36 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 18:28:53 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 18:12:56 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Paul Cooper 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 18:05:38 CET
  • risk due to pre-generated password tables? Klaus Kaiser 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 17:31:12 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? BRG 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 16:05:46 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 15:44:45 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? David A. Scott 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 14:58:49 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Phil Carmody 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 12:50:48 CET
  • Re: Broadcast encryption & Traitor tracing Jan Panteltje 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 12:46:51 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? BRG 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 12:42:44 CET
  • Re: Illegal activities, encrypted files and police Jan Panteltje 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 12:22:16 CET
  • Re: First quantum byte! Mxsmanic 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 12:21:26 CET
  • Re: Illegal activities, encrypted files and police Mxsmanic 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 12:20:18 CET
  • Re: Illegal activities, encrypted files and police Mxsmanic 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 11:55:28 CET
  • Re: Illegal activities, encrypted files and police Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 11:52:53 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 11:47:34 CET
  • Re: First quantum byte! Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 11:21:19 CET
  • Re: Illegal activities, encrypted files and police Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 11:16:44 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Colin Percival 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 11:13:14 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Colin Percival 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 11:06:57 CET
  • Re: Where *IS* Tom? Zeljko Vrba 
• Sat Dec 10 2005 - 10:02:01 CET
  • Re: challenge-response in 32 bits, tradeoffs David Wagner