sci.crypt archive

• Tue Jan 31 2006 - 07:14:30 CET
  • Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack*** Francois Grieu 
• Mon Jan 30 2006 - 07:27:21 CET
  • Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack*** Francois Grieu 
• Fri Jan 27 2006 - 20:07:23 CET
  • *** surviving my new CANCEL attack*** Francois Grieu 
• Thu Jan 19 2006 - 03:14:44 CET
  • Re: none Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Jan 19 2006 - 03:00:02 CET
  • Re: none Bob 
• Thu Jan 19 2006 - 02:48:52 CET
  • Re: none Will Dickson 
• Thu Jan 19 2006 - 01:56:34 CET
  • Re: none Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Jan 19 2006 - 01:05:11 CET
  • Pre-call for submissions for IEEE Std 1363-2000 revision William Whyte 
• Thu Jan 19 2006 - 00:26:53 CET
  • none George Orwell 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 23:53:24 CET
  • Re: easy stealth encryption? Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 23:01:19 CET
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE daniel bleichenbacher 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 22:49:42 CET
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE daniel bleichenbacher 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 21:12:52 CET
  • Re: RSA key length and more Unruh 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 21:11:33 CET
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE Paul Rubin 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 20:57:35 CET
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE Mike Amling 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 20:28:11 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Mxsmanic 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 20:12:21 CET
  • Re: RSA key length and more Paul Leyland 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 20:05:50 CET
  • Open positions at Concordia University, Canada youssef@ciise.concordia.ca 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 20:04:21 CET
  • Tenure-track faculty positions youssef@ciise.concordia.ca 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 18:14:46 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm Bill Unruh 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 17:49:57 CET
  • Re: easy stealth encryption? Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 17:30:34 CET
  • easy stealth encryption? Anonymous 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 16:35:46 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 16:18:51 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 16:17:41 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 14:12:18 CET
  • Re: some question about RSA Tom St Denis 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 13:12:19 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) David Eather 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 09:11:04 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Mxsmanic 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 09:09:40 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Mxsmanic 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 06:11:59 CET
  • Re: some question about RSA Wang 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 04:24:01 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm John Savard 
• Wed Jan 18 2006 - 01:11:11 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Phil Carmody 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 23:37:06 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook s_4@wp.pl 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 23:20:11 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook s_4@wp.pl 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 22:40:46 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 22:23:44 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Andrew Swallow 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 22:16:06 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Unruh 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 22:00:21 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Mike Scott 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 21:57:59 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Andrew Swallow 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 21:50:55 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 21:46:58 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 21:32:31 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook s_4@wp.pl 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 21:22:34 CET
  • Re: Electronic Codebook Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 20:58:54 CET
  • Electronic Codebook s_4@wp.pl 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 18:15:32 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Mack 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 18:02:49 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 17:55:40 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 17:41:33 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Mack 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 17:39:08 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 17:02:49 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 16:48:05 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 16:41:49 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 16:39:11 CET
  • AES4_UICE_slides.pdf Jean Easter 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 16:25:46 CET
  • Re: some question about RSA Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 15:35:32 CET
  • Re: RSA key length and more sillybanter@gmail.com 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 15:31:58 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 14:30:47 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Mxsmanic 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 14:19:49 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Bob 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 13:41:14 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers wwhyte@gmail.com 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 12:19:27 CET
  • FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE Martin Döring 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 11:42:30 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 11:26:12 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 10:18:49 CET
  • Re: some question about RSA Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 09:01:43 CET
  • Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 05:13:22 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 04:59:28 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Jan 17 2006 - 01:41:27 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? chaeso 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 23:39:10 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 23:13:53 CET
  • Re: OT: excellent book on information theory Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 23:11:26 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 22:55:26 CET
  • Re: RSA key length and more Unruh 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 22:47:17 CET
  • Re: RSA key length and more Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 22:04:44 CET
  • Re: RSA key length and more Paul Leyland 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 22:02:03 CET
  • Re: Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers IchBin 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 21:47:56 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Bryan Olson 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 21:39:38 CET
  • Java Source For Asymmetric Key Ciphers Luc The Perverse 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 21:37:05 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 21:29:57 CET
  • Re: OT: excellent book on information theory Paul Rubin 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 21:06:13 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 21:05:12 CET
  • Re: OT: excellent book on information theory Andrew Swallow 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 19:49:48 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 19:35:14 CET
  • Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Mxsmanic 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 19:06:36 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Mxsmanic 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 19:03:36 CET
  • US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-) Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 16:31:58 CET
  • Re: OT: excellent book on information theory Grant Edwards 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 15:13:04 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? chaeso 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 15:04:46 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? chaeso 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 14:57:34 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 14:27:06 CET
  • Computing Chi-square stats on Card deck bkk.ngroup@gmail.com 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 13:58:15 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? chaeso 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 13:11:02 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Mxsmanic 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 13:01:37 CET
  • Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 12:55:32 CET
  • multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful? chaeso 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 10:58:40 CET
  • OT: excellent book on information theory Paul Rubin 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 08:01:59 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: FCS'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Paul Rubin 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 06:19:05 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm Unruh 
• Mon Jan 16 2006 - 03:55:13 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm John Savard 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 23:35:15 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: FCS'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) David C. DiNucci 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 23:08:34 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: FCS'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Paul Rubin 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 22:16:35 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: FCS'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Paul Rubin 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 17:18:16 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 17:14:25 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 14:10:23 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 07:15:53 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: FCS'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Tom St Denis 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 06:43:44 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Erik Naggum 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 06:40:24 CET
  • Call for Papers: FCS'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) A. M. G. Solo 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 03:13:38 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm Unruh 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 01:58:50 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm John Savard 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 01:27:36 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 01:10:10 CET
  • Re: Why should the primes p and q be safe primes? Colin Percival 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 01:09:04 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Jan 15 2006 - 00:02:18 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 23:55:50 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 23:53:21 CET
  • OEF for DH? Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 23:36:00 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 23:30:57 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 23:21:54 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 23:20:39 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 23:03:21 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Paul Rubin 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:56:33 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:26:19 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:01:19 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Paul Rubin 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 21:25:06 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 19:10:15 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? Pubkeybreaker 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 15:32:28 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 15:31:09 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 15:21:52 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 15:18:59 CET
  • Re: Why should the primes p and q be safe primes? Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 14:53:00 CET
  • Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto? David Eather 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 13:40:48 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? Bryan Olson 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 11:17:48 CET
  • Why should the primes p and q be safe primes? bobic 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 10:35:33 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 10:35:06 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 10:31:40 CET
  • Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 10:13:05 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 10:02:42 CET
  • RSA key length and more Pesso 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 09:55:25 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Erik Naggum 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 09:41:17 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 08:27:13 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Erik Naggum 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 07:13:13 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) laughing 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 06:46:42 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Colin Percival 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 06:34:24 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 05:34:09 CET
  • Re: some question about RSA Wang 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 03:22:23 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Mike Amling 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 03:01:00 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 02:22:46 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 02:18:21 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Eduardo Ruiz 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 02:18:20 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Eduardo Ruiz 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 01:30:23 CET
  • Re: some question about RSA Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 01:18:50 CET
  • some question about RSA Wang 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 01:15:49 CET
  • Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto? johnicholas.hines@gmail.com 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 01:15:22 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? Bryan Olson 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 01:09:39 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 01:03:09 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 01:01:19 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 00:42:32 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm Luc The Perverse 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 00:33:34 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? Paul Rubin 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 00:29:15 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm Unruh 
• Sat Jan 14 2006 - 00:20:14 CET
  • Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem Unruh 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 23:52:38 CET
  • Re: A New Encryption Algorithm fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 23:48:45 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 23:42:44 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 23:41:56 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers David Wagner 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 23:38:58 CET
  • Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 22:52:44 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 22:12:18 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 21:44:07 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 21:37:08 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 21:13:43 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Colin Percival 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 21:09:26 CET
  • A New Encryption Algorithm healyd@classicnet.net 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 20:34:52 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 20:31:17 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Mike Amling 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 20:16:08 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 20:09:38 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 20:06:41 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 19:58:15 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Paul Crowley 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 19:24:46 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 19:07:41 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 19:01:22 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 18:55:43 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 18:54:01 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 18:41:21 CET
  • Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem Unruh 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 18:31:07 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 18:19:21 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? Peter Pearson 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 18:10:30 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Pubkeybreaker 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 16:48:10 CET
  • Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 16:12:08 CET
  • [NEWBIE]vigenere cicap 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 15:56:53 CET
  • Re: HMAC vs Salt Shai Halevi 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 15:51:51 CET
  • Re: Is it a hard problem? Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 15:41:20 CET
  • Is it a hard problem? fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 15:00:16 CET
  • Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem fbloveu@hotmail.com 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 13:53:55 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Chris Card 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 11:30:11 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Ichinin 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 10:30:51 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers David Eather 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 04:29:33 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 04:27:27 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Mike Amling 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 04:26:26 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 04:22:04 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) kurt wismer 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 03:44:50 CET
  • Re: DNA used as cipher Bob 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 01:06:44 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Paul Rubin 
• Fri Jan 13 2006 - 00:29:28 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA(Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) David Eather 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 23:40:48 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 22:54:57 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! Paul Leyland 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 22:06:42 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 20:41:30 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Mike Amling 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 20:20:46 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Erik Naggum 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 19:32:23 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 19:26:23 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 18:38:17 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 18:00:49 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Ichinin 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 17:25:13 CET
  • Re: HMAC vs Salt Hieu 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 16:57:58 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Berryo 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 15:43:10 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation laicko 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 15:11:21 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 14:02:50 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) The Flavored Coffee Guy 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 13:52:12 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Bryan Olson 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 13:48:03 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 13:39:43 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 13:25:45 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 12:25:14 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) elgersmad@rock.com 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 10:33:58 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 09:11:39 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 08:29:28 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers ink 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 08:22:57 CET
  • project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB) Kasparov 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 06:49:57 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 06:47:34 CET
  • Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) Dave (from the UK) 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 04:47:00 CET
  • Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) A. M. G. Solo 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 04:12:39 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Gabriel Lear 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 03:33:04 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 03:10:24 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 02:12:15 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation laicko 
• Thu Jan 12 2006 - 01:44:49 CET
  • Re: DNA used as cipher christo 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:40:48 CET
  • Re: HMAC vs Salt Mike Amling 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:39:07 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:37:18 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers BRG 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:37:17 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:35:50 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:31:17 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:28:09 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:26:43 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:24:40 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:22:47 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:17:25 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 21:09:40 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 18:43:34 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 18:37:38 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 18:14:42 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 18:06:19 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Juuso Hukkanen 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 16:55:37 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers daniel bleichenbacher 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 16:31:36 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation David Wagner 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 14:57:19 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers ink 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 13:07:25 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers BRG 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 12:45:01 CET
  • Re: HMAC vs Salt Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 12:42:42 CET
  • Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto? David Eather 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 11:54:19 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers BRG 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 10:35:13 CET
  • Re: DNA used as cipher A. Caspis 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 09:05:24 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 08:53:24 CET
  • Re: blind signature is not blind enough? Bryan Olson 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 08:39:52 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 08:08:44 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation laicko 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 07:46:20 CET
  • Re: DNA used as cipher Doug 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 06:41:45 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 05:57:21 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 03:47:48 CET
  • Re: How to represent a message as a point M in ECC with Miracl Berlid 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 03:23:12 CET
  • Re: HMAC vs Salt Hieu 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 03:01:11 CET
  • Re: HMAC vs Salt Tom St Denis 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 02:36:14 CET
  • Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto? wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 02:20:53 CET
  • HMAC vs Salt Hieu 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 02:06:14 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 02:01:38 CET
  • Re: DNA used as cipher Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 01:41:51 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers David Wagner 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 01:33:50 CET
  • Re: DNA used as cipher wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 01:02:28 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers BRG 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 00:55:23 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} Gabriel Lear 
• Wed Jan 11 2006 - 00:34:53 CET
  • DNA used as cipher christo 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 23:15:57 CET
  • Re: blind signature is not blind enough? Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 22:55:06 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Bill Unruh 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 22:32:18 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:59:05 CET
  • Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto? Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:46:12 CET
  • Re: rsa key generation question Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:45:46 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:38:12 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:36:25 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} Gregory G Rose 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:21:05 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:19:16 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:18:16 CET
  • Re: masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:10:44 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:09:29 CET
  • Re: blind signature is not blind enough? Jeff 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 19:57:50 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 19:51:00 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 19:49:53 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 19:48:28 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 19:34:29 CET
  • Re: blind signature is not blind enough? Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 19:34:16 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Terry Ritter 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 18:36:33 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 18:29:14 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! Chris Card 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 18:18:16 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 18:11:59 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 17:30:06 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Richard Herring 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 17:24:47 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility Bryan Olson 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 16:54:59 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation David Wagner 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 16:29:51 CET
  • Re: blind signature is not blind enough? Bryan Olson 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 16:21:55 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 16:19:06 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Nemok 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 16:03:32 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation Mike Scott 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 15:53:50 CET
  • Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 15:28:26 CET
  • efficiency question about modular exponention operation laicko 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 15:19:00 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 15:18:07 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 15:07:16 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 14:58:58 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 14:41:32 CET
  • Re: How to represent a message as a point M in ECC with Miracl Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 14:39:27 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 14:02:25 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 13:46:08 CET
  • Re: rsa key generation question kaskati2003@yahoo.com 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 13:37:09 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 13:07:42 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Richard Herring 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 13:07:39 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Richard Herring 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 12:52:19 CET
  • Re: masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway David A Molnar 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 12:51:57 CET
  • Re: masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway quasi 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 12:14:52 CET
  • Re: masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 11:32:47 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Phil Carmody 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 10:16:58 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! Chris Card 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 10:00:12 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Chris Card 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 09:42:45 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Colin Percival 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 09:17:46 CET
  • How to represent a message as a point M in ECC with Miracl jean_lee1998id@hotmail.com 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 07:28:46 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 06:46:50 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 06:13:33 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} David Eather 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 05:55:38 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 05:54:41 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility Mxsmanic 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 05:03:01 CET
  • RSA encrypt/decrypt in C++ (with OpenSSL) Carlos Moreno 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:55:58 CET
  • blind signature is not blind enough? Jeff.Lee.sci@gmail.com 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:50:50 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:48:29 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:46:04 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:42:38 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:34:45 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:31:07 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:28:01 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:23:57 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:22:09 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:15:38 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:15:14 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:10:47 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:04:22 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 03:49:06 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm David Wagner 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 03:03:17 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Gregory G Rose 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 02:47:17 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Michael Harrington 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 02:20:51 CET
  • Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto? wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 02:17:53 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} stan 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 02:13:07 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 02:08:01 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 02:02:55 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 02:01:11 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 01:35:27 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 01:15:20 CET
  • Re: msieve is FAST!! Phil Carmody 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:50:25 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:49:44 CET
  • msieve is FAST!! wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:40:12 CET
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:39:16 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:37:11 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:34:30 CET
  • porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:33:06 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} John E. Hadstate 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:30:33 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:24:06 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:23:51 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:23:17 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:20:26 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:19:45 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:19:20 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:17:52 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:15:18 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:08:22 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:07:24 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:05:53 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:01:11 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom@att.NOT 
• Tue Jan 10 2006 - 00:00:01 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm David Wagner 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 23:55:19 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 23:51:52 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm David Wagner 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 23:50:29 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 23:48:31 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 23:40:55 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Paul Rubin 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 23:16:00 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 23:06:22 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:57:43 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers stan 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:56:11 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:45:26 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:38:56 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} stan 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:37:45 CET
  • Re: How to construct one-way permutation from one-way function? Mike Amling 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:35:04 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Mike Amling 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:33:33 CET
  • Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto? Mike Amling 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:32:52 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this Mike Amling 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 22:10:12 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 21:57:11 CET
  • Re: masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway Thomas 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 21:52:56 CET
  • Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 21:50:53 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 21:43:48 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 20:47:21 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 20:43:40 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm David Wagner 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 20:21:41 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 20:21:23 CET
  • self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator} cryptonom 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 20:10:27 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers cryptonom 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 20:04:20 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility cryptonom 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:54:30 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm David Wagner 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:51:57 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm David Wagner 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:47:30 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Jan Panteltje 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:41:35 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:36:55 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Mxsmanic 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:25:23 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:18:29 CET
  • Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ? Richard Herring 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 19:07:17 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility Unruh 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 18:02:39 CET
  • Re: How to construct one-way permutation from one-way function? Peter Pearson 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 17:05:45 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 16:06:37 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 15:24:44 CET
  • How to construct one-way permutation from one-way function? dan 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 15:05:54 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 13:41:35 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 13:20:37 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 13:01:33 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Chris Card 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 12:59:14 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 12:40:38 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Juuso Hukkanen 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 12:08:55 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Bryan Olson 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 11:47:45 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 11:02:21 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers Michael Harrington 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 10:47:05 CET
  • Re: Computing big numbers ink 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 09:30:36 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 08:09:12 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:38:31 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:04:23 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 06:15:55 CET
  • Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor David A Molnar 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 05:28:16 CET
  • Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor MrFix3 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 03:24:51 CET
  • Re: Quality of parisien encryption utility Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 02:19:36 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Mon Jan 09 2006 - 01:18:33 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Terry Ritter 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 22:37:43 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 22:13:21 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 21:56:06 CET
  • Computing big numbers toorandom@gmail.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 21:21:48 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 21:20:23 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 20:45:13 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm wbhart@sbcglobal.net 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 18:15:25 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 17:58:12 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm JP LR 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 16:38:01 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Unruh 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 14:03:05 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization snaga 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 12:23:28 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 12:22:49 CET
  • rosary-based low-tech crypto? johnicholas.hines@gmail.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 10:24:03 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Luc The Perverse 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 10:14:41 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 10:14:11 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 08:59:19 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 07:53:31 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 05:17:49 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 03:16:31 CET
  • Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor David A Molnar 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 02:28:25 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Tuna Fish 
• Sun Jan 08 2006 - 00:28:23 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 23:11:37 CET
  • Re: masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway Phil Carmody 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 23:08:37 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 20:34:01 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Mike Amling 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 20:19:18 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Mike Amling 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 18:18:43 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Bryan Olson 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 17:39:43 CET
  • Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor Carlos Moreno 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 17:31:33 CET
  • Re: masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway Carlos Moreno 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 16:19:13 CET
  • masters programs in cryptology/information security/Royal Holloway Thomas 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 15:38:35 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Phil Carmody 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 14:43:49 CET
  • Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm Tino Schwarze 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 14:21:51 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Nemok 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 11:32:06 CET
  • Re: A factoring algorithm Juuso Hukkanen 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 10:34:30 CET
  • Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor David A Molnar 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 09:41:13 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Joseph Ashwood 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 07:14:42 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Paul Rubin 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 07:03:44 CET
  • A factoring algorithm hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 06:44:38 CET
  • Re: SIGS How to get the sieving polynoms hart_wb@yahoo.com 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 05:47:12 CET
  • CFP: Special Issue on Web Engineering (The journal Engineering Letters) imecs_2006@iaeng.org 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 05:40:35 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Paul Rubin 
• Sat Jan 07 2006 - 00:30:47 CET
  • Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm David Wagner 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 23:19:33 CET
  • Recommentations for research topic and mentor truevalue@gmail.com 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 22:54:24 CET
  • Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 22:35:53 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Luc The Perverse 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 21:57:54 CET
  • Re: [3XPost] 2nd step for Montgomery-form elliptic Curves Chip Eastham 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 21:51:27 CET
  • Re: [3XPost] 2nd step for Montgomery-form elliptic Curves Robert Redelmeier 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 21:43:03 CET
  • Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm David Wagner 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 21:41:35 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm David Wagner 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 21:40:32 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Andrew Swallow 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 21:27:09 CET
  • [3XPost] 2nd step for Montgomery-form elliptic Curves avvio 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 21:02:35 CET
  • Double-applied symmetric algorithm David F 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 20:06:32 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 19:56:26 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Nemok 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 19:34:22 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 19:28:57 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Unruh 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 19:23:17 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Mike Amling 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 19:13:21 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Tom St Denis 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 19:10:23 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Jameson King 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 18:44:34 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Nemok 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 17:30:59 CET
  • Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 17:11:50 CET
  • Help needed with encryption algorithm Nemok 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 14:28:14 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation) Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 13:46:17 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation) Tomasz Leskier 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 13:10:31 CET
  • Biotechnology********Intellectual Property Rights contactme4u@gmail.com 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 12:26:17 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? stan 
• Fri Jan 06 2006 - 10:33:46 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Neo 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 20:10:45 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Unruh 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 16:21:23 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation) Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 14:23:09 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 13:58:54 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Jan Panteltje 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 10:45:01 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation) Tomasz Leskier 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 10:29:27 CET
  • Re: OEF curve Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 07:00:07 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation) Tom St Denis 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 06:16:09 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Donald 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 03:09:28 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Will Dickson 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 02:44:01 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Mike Amling 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 02:28:12 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Luc The Perverse 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 01:34:09 CET
  • Re: OEF curve Darrel Hankerson 
• Thu Jan 05 2006 - 01:10:24 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 23:33:26 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 22:50:16 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 22:49:15 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 21:37:57 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization ht9j35r02@sneakemail.com 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 20:11:05 CET
  • Java iButton discontinued Paul Rubin 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 20:01:00 CET
  • Re: OEF curve WiteG 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 19:48:29 CET
  • Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation) WiteG 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 18:22:03 CET
  • project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation) Tomasz Leskier 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 16:30:36 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Vernon Schryver 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 16:27:47 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 15:56:57 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 14:03:07 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Jan Panteltje 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 10:14:43 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 03:29:04 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Mike Amling 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 03:18:12 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Paul Rubin 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 03:05:37 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Doug 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 02:04:24 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Paul Rubin 
• Wed Jan 04 2006 - 00:12:47 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator David Eather 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 23:08:06 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 20:31:27 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Mike Amling 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 20:04:09 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization David Wagner 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 19:34:34 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 19:00:58 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization snaga 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 17:57:08 CET
  • Re: RS-232 random number generator Paul Rubin 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 17:11:46 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? vedaal 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 16:16:14 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Doug 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 15:28:50 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 14:35:40 CET
  • enigmail, evolution with signature and encryption Peter Schwabe 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 13:18:32 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this John E. Hadstate 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 10:59:14 CET
  • PKI question, trusting subordinate CA hagaiy@yahoo.com 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 07:20:08 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this Luc The Perverse 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 07:06:10 CET
  • Re: Can you crack this Siddharam Shingshetty 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 04:52:40 CET
  • Re: sending hidden messages Twittering One 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 03:53:41 CET
  • Re: Software protection against cracks and piracy JiXian Yang 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 03:44:00 CET
  • Re: Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography" Tom St Denis 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 01:22:16 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Tue Jan 03 2006 - 00:48:28 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Unruh 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 23:59:55 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 23:49:15 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 22:24:00 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? David Wagner 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 22:05:57 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 22:01:19 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 21:33:36 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 21:17:53 CET
  • Re: On IVs Ivan Voras 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 20:42:32 CET
  • Re: NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! Avenging Dolphins Against NOAA 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 20:37:11 CET
  • how to manage certificate store jay25dec@gmail.com 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 19:52:06 CET
  • Re: Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography" Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 19:15:01 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 19:01:35 CET
  • Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography" Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 18:58:18 CET
  • Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography" Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 17:50:41 CET
  • Re: Software protection against cracks and piracy invalid@example.com 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 17:35:52 CET
  • Re: On IVs Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 17:08:02 CET
  • Re: On IVs Ivan Voras 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 17:02:36 CET
  • Re: On IVs Ivan Voras 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 16:37:12 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 15:53:02 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? Francois Grieu 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 14:37:10 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? stan 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 14:26:56 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? David Eather 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 13:10:09 CET
  • OT: no longer of any interest to sci.crypt as a whole WAS Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 12:41:54 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 12:39:39 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 12:37:21 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 12:24:09 CET
  • Re: OEF curve Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 11:40:16 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 11:26:58 CET
  • Re: AES operation order Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 10:50:16 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? Joseph Ashwood 
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Joseph Ashwood 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 10:44:33 CET
  • Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used? Francois Grieu 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 09:57:17 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization snaga 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 08:20:03 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 08:09:09 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? cryptonom 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 03:33:57 CET
  • Re: On IVs David Wagner 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 03:25:18 CET
  • CFP: ACISP 2005 Jeffrey Horton 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 03:24:16 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 03:09:22 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 03:04:57 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 02:50:42 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 02:48:36 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 02:47:11 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 02:45:43 CET
  • Re: On IVs Tom St Denis 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 02:00:38 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 01:43:44 CET
  • On IVs Ivan Voras 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 01:40:34 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 00:49:13 CET
  • Re: NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! DrPostman 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 00:35:16 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Phil Carmody 
• Mon Jan 02 2006 - 00:20:18 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 22:36:38 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Unruh 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 21:39:22 CET
  • Re: OT: Why include this in your reply? stan 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 20:10:19 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization snaga 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 19:45:19 CET
  • Re: sending hidden messages Peter Fairbrother 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 19:02:24 CET
  • sending hidden messages hassan.jameel@gmail.com 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 17:17:32 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Peter Fairbrother 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 16:10:05 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 16:01:10 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 14:59:45 CET
  • Re: Non-computer randomization Paul Rubin 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 14:50:11 CET
  • Non-computer randomization snaga 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 14:02:02 CET
  • Re: NSA NSA NSA hey hey hey SHOW US THE WAY RAY!!! Ichinin 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 13:52:39 CET
  • Re: Is Mondex secure? (was: Re: Changes in laws about personal behaviours) Cynic 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 13:44:56 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Paul Rubin 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 13:38:38 CET
  • Re: SHA Question Ichinin 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 13:30:43 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 12:44:16 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 12:16:08 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Paul Rubin 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 11:11:51 CET
  • Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution? Doug 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 04:03:44 CET
  • Re: Why include this in your reply? Gabriel Lear 
• Sun Jan 01 2006 - 00:21:34 CET
  • Re: Password length and bit number of encryption algorithm? Joseph Ashwood