sci.crypt archive

• aarthi28@gmail.com
  • Algebraic Geometric Codes (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 10:31:03 CEST)
• Adam Funk
  • Don't be a fool: stay in school! (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:02:23 CEST)
• akircanski@gmail.com
  • Schneiers autotutorial: solutions to some of the problems he proposed (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 10:00:44 CEST)
• Al
  • small and portable library for pke (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 20:13:24 CEST)
• Alex Vinokur
  • Re: Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 07:43:31 CEST)
  • Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 17:47:49 CEST)
• Allan Herriman
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 08:26:05 CEST)
• Andrew Chaplin
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 17:26:57 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 17:50:44 CEST)
• Andrew Swallow
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:20:30 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 02:19:07 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 02:04:44 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 22:31:05 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 22:07:31 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 06:58:52 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 05:48:17 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 05:37:00 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 03:50:50 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 20:12:09 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 06:10:40 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 20:41:16 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 20:13:35 CEST)
• Ann
  • 3DES (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 21:12:06 CEST)
• Anne & Lynn Wheeler
  • Re: trusted certificates and trusted repositories (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 19:50:59 CEST)
  • trusted repositories and trusted transactions (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 17:52:41 CEST)
  • trusted certificates and trusted repositories (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 16:55:09 CEST)
• Anonymous
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 04:48:02 CEST)
• Arild Bjørk
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 18:11:40 CEST)
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 15:38:12 CEST)
• Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 21:08:24 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 07:14:45 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 15:54:43 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 04:19:35 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 03:24:29 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 03:09:46 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 02:54:30 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 02:53:19 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 00:45:26 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Sun Apr 02 2006 - 20:25:53 CEST)
• ashish.sharma.ait@gmail.com
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 19:01:17 CEST)
  • Re: Encryption device (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 18:54:40 CEST)
  • Re: Encryption device (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 04:39:25 CEST)
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 13:15:27 CEST)
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:00:26 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 19:23:13 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 18:47:48 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 21:23:39 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 21:18:55 CEST)
  • Re: Help Needed with Cryptanalysis (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 20:54:06 CEST)
  • Re: Help Needed with Cryptanalysis (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 18:44:11 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 21:10:29 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 18:51:04 CEST)
  • Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 16:09:38 CEST)
  • Help Needed with Cryptanalysis (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 07:22:29 CEST)
• Austin Lesea
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:55:32 CEST)
• axellec@netcourrier.com
  • LRW's tweak values (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 12:26:53 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 12:19:25 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 17:48:50 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 16:59:19 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 16:56:17 CEST)
  • CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 13:49:25 CEST)
• Ben Livengood
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 06:24:35 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:46:30 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:52:35 CEST)
  • Re: ECC template library (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 03:03:43 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:58:08 CEST)
  • Re: ECC template library (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 23:37:35 CEST)
• Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: getting nth prime (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:57:47 CEST)
  • Re: getting nth prime (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 18:49:44 CEST)
• benlucas99@hotmail.com
  • DSA encryption (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 23:47:12 CEST)
• Bill Unruh
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 02:06:23 CEST)
• BlagooBlanaa
  • Re: Scientist discovers Message from God. (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 07:41:59 CEST)
• bluekylin@gmail.com
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 09:08:05 CEST)
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 11:05:34 CEST)
  • see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 10:59:03 CEST)
• Bob Terwilliger
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 07:56:14 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 03:21:57 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 09:54:52 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 06:55:22 CEST)
• bob@coolgroups.com
  • aes (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 03:09:32 CEST)
• bobic
  • Re: Symmetric encryption scheme (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 04:13:48 CEST)
  • Re: Symmetric encryption scheme (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 04:55:46 CEST)
  • Re: Symmetric encryption scheme (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 16:01:22 CEST)
  • Symmetric encryption scheme (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 03:38:01 CEST)
  • Re: How to be co-prime? (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 14:17:42 CEST)
  • How to be co-prime? (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 10:18:12 CEST)
• BRG
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 08:23:36 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 08:13:02 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:35:29 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:18:42 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 13:56:45 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 12:51:57 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 10:48:37 CEST)
  • Re: LRW's tweak values (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 00:47:53 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 21:22:01 CEST)
  • Re: LRW's tweak values (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 14:15:10 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 15:38:00 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 15:33:27 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 15:12:46 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 13:59:49 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 13:30:30 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 12:03:46 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 08:06:02 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 00:32:30 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 22:07:16 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 17:54:24 CEST)
• c d saunter
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 23:02:42 CEST)
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 22:39:41 CEST)
• calum
  • Re-authentication using the session key generated by SRP. (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 11:59:32 CEST)
• Cam Jones
  • Re: Scientist discovers Message from God. (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 00:13:09 CEST)
• Carlos Moreno
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 16:56:05 CEST)
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 15:30:17 CEST)
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 22:46:17 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 16:29:57 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:24:58 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 18:06:32 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 16:19:11 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 15:32:50 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 15:30:36 CEST)
  • Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 01:20:14 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 17:34:09 CEST)
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 14:49:57 CEST)
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 15:38:09 CEST)
  • Re: IBM Touts Integrated Encryption (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 15:35:01 CEST)
  • Re: IBM Touts Integrated Encryption (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 05:04:10 CEST)
  • Re: Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Sun Apr 02 2006 - 23:34:37 CEST)
  • Puzzled (4^162 mod 100) (Sun Apr 02 2006 - 07:13:16 CEST)
• cascares@yahoo.com
  • Re: Yet another crackpot idea (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 23:48:02 CEST)
  • Yet another crackpot idea (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 03:03:46 CEST)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: 2nd Underhanded C Contest Begins (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 03:48:50 CEST)
• Chris Barts
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 14:15:18 CEST)
• Christian Siebert
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:51:27 CEST)
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 18:42:04 CEST)
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 14:48:55 CEST)
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 11:03:01 CEST)
  • Re: getting nth prime (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 19:04:22 CEST)
  • Re: Multiplicative method and hash collisions (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 10:30:30 CEST)
• Civitas Fenniae
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 09:28:23 CEST)
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 09:00:53 CEST)
  • Re: Kadima wants Matti Makela to become the Mayor of the city of Varkaus ... (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 10:29:08 CEST)
• clark
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:53:00 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 18:59:30 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:08:48 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 17:52:33 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 16:00:09 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 15:38:29 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 10:31:45 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 01:02:45 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 14:29:56 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 19:49:23 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 08:08:34 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 19:51:17 CEST)
• cody.roux@gmail.com
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:59:32 CEST)
• colmukesh@gmail.com
  • Hello. Help With Getting Started (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 19:38:26 CEST)
• contini@matmail.com
  • Re: Breaking RSA (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 11:04:42 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 01:54:45 CEST)
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 01:48:32 CEST)
  • Re: Symmetric encryption scheme (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 04:08:13 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 03:10:34 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 02:33:33 CEST)
  • Re: Braid groups (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 03:28:07 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 03:24:59 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 08:04:13 CEST)
  • Re: Help Needed with Cryptanalysis (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 07:54:49 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 06:42:37 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring large composite numbers (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 07:13:53 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring large composite numbers (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 07:08:39 CEST)
• crasmarum@gmail.com
  • Re: Software protection (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 12:16:00 CEST)
• Cristiano
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 16:33:29 CEST)
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 14:02:49 CEST)
• cryptic99@walla.com
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:48:10 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:09:02 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 23:59:35 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 23:04:28 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 22:19:28 CEST)
  • Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 21:31:06 CEST)
  • Re: Encryption device (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 00:16:52 CEST)
  • Encryption device (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 21:27:47 CEST)
• cryptonewbie
  • Re: Sigma protocol for this relation (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 23:16:56 CEST)
  • Sigma protocol for this relation (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 23:01:44 CEST)
• cypher
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 16:10:33 CEST)
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 21:40:09 CEST)
• D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 02:50:47 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 02:14:28 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 06:21:49 CEST)
• dan
  • Re: Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 07:33:33 CEST)
  • Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 08:26:08 CEST)
• daniel bleichenbacher
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 13:19:14 CEST)
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 13:01:04 CEST)
• Daniel James
  • Re: Bruce Schneier Gets It Wrong (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 15:14:39 CEST)
• Dave English
  • Re: Cipher for multiple Recievers (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 16:50:35 CEST)
• Dave Turner
  • Re: Latest factoring idea, might work (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:25:50 CEST)
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 12:47:24 CEST)
  • Proving to a 3rd party youve recommended their product without showing them the msg (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 17:33:23 CEST)
  • Re: Help Needed with Cryptanalysis (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 12:20:48 CEST)
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 14:11:15 CEST)
• David A. Scott
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 04:58:35 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 14:52:13 CEST)
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 15:47:16 CEST)
• David E. Ross
  • Re: Cipher for multiple Recievers (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 19:58:30 CEST)
  • Re: Cipher for multiple Recievers (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:07:50 CEST)
• David Eather
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 15:15:28 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 03:06:35 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 14:10:36 CEST)
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 13:54:46 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 21:09:31 CEST)
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 12:25:46 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 12:23:46 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 11:02:10 CEST)
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 10:57:41 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 16:09:58 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 14:51:19 CEST)
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 18:37:39 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:16:43 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:28:13 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:25:30 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:03:39 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 04:28:27 CEST)
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 04:10:44 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 18:38:53 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 12:48:03 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 16:00:03 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 19:46:38 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 16:34:18 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 16:28:20 CEST)
• David Wagner
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 21:40:28 CEST)
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:22:58 CEST)
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:26:09 CEST)
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 21:02:40 CEST)
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 20:51:01 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:50:00 CEST)
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:20:57 CEST)
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:48:35 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:45:18 CEST)
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 00:55:42 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 03:23:49 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:33:55 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:31:56 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:55:34 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:48:48 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 16:24:16 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 16:21:03 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:31:09 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 00:08:51 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:37:27 CEST)
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 17:00:09 CEST)
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 09:44:15 CEST)
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 08:30:01 CEST)
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 06:14:14 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 05:58:37 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 00:14:26 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 20:16:11 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:19:27 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:14:54 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 23:04:46 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 22:50:38 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:40:48 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 03:31:57 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 03:27:38 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:18:11 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:36:53 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:30:32 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:27:14 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:47:09 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 04:10:24 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 18:09:01 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:47:55 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:23:01 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:01:35 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 03:41:52 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 03:01:04 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 02:59:51 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 18:02:01 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 06:54:30 CEST)
  • Re: Open source secure browser-based storage, with a $1000 challenge (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 23:19:23 CEST)
  • Re: Open source secure browser-based storage, with a $1000 challenge (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 22:26:58 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 08:22:09 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 05:39:06 CEST)
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:01:02 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:52:36 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 06:59:10 CEST)
  • Re: IBM Touts Integrated Encryption (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 01:51:34 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 18:57:42 CEST)
  • Re: IBM Touts Integrated Encryption (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 17:19:40 CEST)
  • Re: IBM Touts Integrated Encryption (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 08:47:17 CEST)
  • Re: Funding to Attend SAM 06, LV, US (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 08:41:38 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 00:39:33 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 20:39:01 CEST)
  • Re: Multiplicative method and hash collisions (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 10:05:05 CEST)
  • Re: Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 22:57:36 CEST)
  • Re: Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 21:35:03 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 18:44:21 CEST)
  • Re: Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 18:00:58 CEST)
  • Re: Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 09:36:49 CEST)
• david.florman@att.net
  • How bout another number, Joe? (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 17:36:56 CEST)
• DERASN.1@gmail.com
  • Question about SHA1 result length (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 22:10:47 CEST)
• Dhairyas
  • getting Numbers (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:36:32 CEST)
  • Re: getting nth prime (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:27:31 CEST)
  • Re: getting nth prime (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:34:51 CEST)
  • getting nth prime (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 16:55:41 CEST)
• Dilbertarian
  • Re: Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 17:51:59 CEST)
  • Re: Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 10:21:38 CEST)
  • Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 09:11:27 CEST)
• Donald
  • Re: Cipher for multiple Recievers (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 02:36:29 CEST)
• Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:39:39 CEST)
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 23:03:02 CEST)
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:42:26 CEST)
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:40:08 CEST)
  • Re: Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:28:01 CEST)
  • Re: 2nd Underhanded C Contest Begins (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 22:58:50 CEST)
• Dr John Stockton
  • 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:15:42 CEST)
• Dr. Who
  • Re: Bruce Schneier Gets It Wrong (Sun Apr 02 2006 - 16:53:27 CEST)
• duoduolei@gmail.com
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 17:00:09 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 12:47:51 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 12:47:47 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 12:39:39 CEST)
• Earl
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 18:26:12 CEST)
• Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: Encrypted configuration file? (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 22:28:54 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 01:04:34 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:47:42 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:13:24 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 13:16:17 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 13:01:43 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 12:22:17 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 12:12:37 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 04:33:29 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 03:36:20 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 01:51:39 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 01:24:05 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:43:05 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 11:36:50 CEST)
  • Re: Yet another crackpot idea (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 03:32:46 CEST)
  • Re: Yet another crackpot idea (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 02:53:14 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 08:45:16 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 01:49:28 CEST)
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 03:40:47 CEST)
  • Re: IBM Touts Integrated Encryption (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 08:13:33 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection solution (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 05:04:28 CEST)
  • IBM Touts Integrated Encryption (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 21:48:31 CEST)
  • Re: Epi-Cipher (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 19:30:32 CEST)
  • Re: Epi-Cipher (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 18:36:57 CEST)
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 16:07:43 CEST)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier Gets It Wrong (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 18:01:40 CEST)
• Einstein
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:18:09 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:14:58 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 06:31:12 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 17:49:34 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:14:08 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:13:06 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 14:32:54 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 23:27:52 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 05:45:04 CEST)
  • Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 10:07:11 CEST)
• Elisabeth Oswald
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 09:07:04 CEST)
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 15:51:04 CEST)
• ergun
  • Some questions about BB84 (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 19:22:01 CEST)
• Eric Young
  • Re: 64-bit AES (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 15:16:51 CEST)
• Erwin Moller
  • Re: My symbol is the universial symbol of Christinity -- an 8-pointed star inside a triangle ... (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 11:04:45 CEST)
• Example
  • DigiSecret (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 15:53:45 CEST)
• fabrice.gautier@gmail.com
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 04:40:43 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:58:51 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 22:08:48 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:31:41 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:24:13 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 03:34:27 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 23:18:38 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 23:15:26 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:50:49 CEST)
  • EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:55:12 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:25:53 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:37:30 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:30:10 CEST)
  • PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 23:52:10 CEST)
  • Re: Cipher for multiple Recievers (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 09:19:51 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 04:25:11 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 02:44:33 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 02:41:53 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 02:30:31 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 02:22:30 CEST)
  • Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 15:17:30 CEST)
  • Re: Diffie Hellman sessions (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 11:09:16 CEST)
  • Diffie Hellman sessions (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 10:06:42 CEST)
• FatKat
  • Re: "Da Vinci" judge and unexpected crypto challenge (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 23:12:14 CEST)
• Felix Rawlings
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, corrected equations (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 18:34:38 CEST)
• filia&sofia
  • Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 19:44:23 CEST)
• framarks@molcho.com
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 15:20:18 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 15:02:46 CEST)
• Francois Grieu
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 19:35:15 CEST)
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 14:46:43 CEST)
  • Re: getting nth prime (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 07:24:45 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 06:01:12 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:23:06 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 12:03:39 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:48:48 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 11:34:45 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 09:47:13 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 09:16:51 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 15:04:05 CEST)
  • Re: 3DES (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 08:49:38 CEST)
  • Re: How to be co-prime? (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 08:08:19 CEST)
• Fred
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 18:48:36 CEST)
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 18:37:41 CEST)
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 18:30:28 CEST)
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 18:30:27 CEST)
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 07:34:22 CEST)
  • Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 19:44:53 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptainer LE (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 19:13:53 CEST)
• Fred Head
  • Re: Goldbach, quadratic residues, brainstorming (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 06:22:34 CEST)
• Fred J. McCall
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 07:19:28 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:22:11 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:20:22 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:19:11 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:39:46 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 06:31:02 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 06:29:46 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 01:16:54 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 01:11:24 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 23:27:55 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 20:58:55 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 11:04:33 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 08:39:36 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 07:42:02 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 07:11:13 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 06:46:27 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 06:36:35 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 00:31:48 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 00:24:11 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 20:33:52 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 08:21:22 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 07:12:44 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 06:39:30 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 06:32:27 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 06:30:44 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 06:22:33 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 00:37:00 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 00:31:12 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 00:25:32 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 00:18:26 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 00:15:48 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 23:52:41 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 23:23:17 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 18:43:58 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 18:24:51 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 18:23:54 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 06:42:50 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 06:40:40 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 04:32:42 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 03:45:15 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 03:27:30 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 03:11:36 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 15:57:00 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 13:23:56 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 12:58:52 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 05:39:19 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 04:35:41 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 04:20:31 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 04:17:59 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 16:00:45 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 15:50:06 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 06:49:20 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 05:26:24 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 15:45:14 CEST)
• fredfighter@spamcop.net
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:28:20 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 18:13:50 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 21:24:00 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 01:15:10 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 21:43:12 CEST)
• friebal@gmx-topmail.de
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:38:34 CEST)
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:17:05 CEST)
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:07:19 CEST)
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 14:17:46 CEST)
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 12:08:45 CEST)
  • DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 10:20:04 CEST)
• frogstar
  • JavaScrypt Encryption & Decryption - Codegroup bias? (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 01:40:35 CEST)
• George Marsaglia
  • Re: Subtract-and-carry PRNGs (Sun Apr 02 2006 - 01:29:18 CEST)
• Gian-Carlo Pascutto
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 11:11:35 CEST)
• Gib Bogle
  • Re: Latest factoring idea, might work (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 22:34:22 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:04:28 CEST)
• giorgio.tani
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:55:09 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 09:38:28 CEST)
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 14:51:05 CEST)
• gmu2006@gmail.com
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 18:16:44 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 16:17:22 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 14:08:04 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 14:06:31 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 21:25:54 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 19:34:25 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 16:50:13 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 15:21:08 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 14:15:21 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 23:52:46 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:49:30 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:46:48 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:39:36 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:35:42 CEST)
  • authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:02:55 CEST)
• gregofiesh@yahoo.com
  • ECC template library (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 22:13:36 CEST)
• Gregory G Rose
  • Re: Need Help With Digraphic Cipher (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 19:48:12 CEST)
  • Re: Reducing hashing collision (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 19:40:33 CEST)
  • Re: Reducing hashing collision (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 21:05:19 CEST)
• gschultz@clearcreek.com
  • Chaffing and deniability in pencil-and-paper ciphers (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 19:08:00 CEST)
• guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 07:07:58 CEST)
• hassan.jameel@gmail.com
  • Elliptic Curve RSA (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 13:41:05 CEST)
• HelpmaBoab
  • Re: Scientist discovers Message from God. (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 12:35:00 CEST)
  • Re: Scientist discovers Message from God. (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 05:03:14 CEST)
• Henrick Hellström
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 01:21:53 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:51:50 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:29:22 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 22:28:42 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:11:12 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:44:17 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 12:14:49 CEST)
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:05:54 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 13:08:53 CEST)
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 12:48:21 CEST)
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 16:15:55 CEST)
  • Synchronization of SSL/TLS alerts (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 11:08:40 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 14:16:53 CEST)
• Henry J Cobb
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 07:44:00 CEST)
• Hexenmeister
  • Re: Scientist discovers Message from God. (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 23:20:59 CEST)
  • Re: Scientist discovers Message from God. (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 23:20:58 CEST)
• Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 02:02:53 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:41:41 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 05:33:35 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 16:41:09 CEST)
• hugonz@gmail.com
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:22:44 CEST)
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 22:39:04 CEST)
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 22:11:29 CEST)
  • Implementing byte stream cipher (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 23:55:30 CEST)
• Ilya the Recusant
  • Re: Explaining One-time pads? (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 21:51:31 CEST)
  • Re: Explaining One-time pads? (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 19:27:37 CEST)
  • Re: Spoofed Messages In sci.crypt (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 19:25:25 CEST)
• imthewakk0@gmail.com
  • Re: Seeking entropy article by Whatsisname (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 23:33:00 CEST)
• ink
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 16:16:24 CEST)
• iwhisper.info@gmail.com
  • Re: Open source secure browser-based storage, with a $1000 challenge (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 01:27:20 CEST)
  • Re: Open source secure browser-based storage, with a $1000 challenge (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 22:55:55 CEST)
  • Open source secure browser-based storage, with a $1000 challenge (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 22:04:06 CEST)
• J. Francis
  • Re: Scientist discovers Message from God. (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 11:00:02 CEST)
• Jack
  • Re: Reducing hashing collision (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 07:39:59 CEST)
  • Reducing hashing collision (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 16:58:32 CEST)
• Jack Linthicum
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 16:59:06 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 12:53:08 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 14:04:02 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 19:40:18 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 22:41:34 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:18:26 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:08:32 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 13:45:46 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 13:00:53 CEST)
• Jack Love
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:10:02 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:08:43 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:07:48 CEST)
• jacklinthicum@earthlink.net
  • A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 13:57:51 CEST)
• james
  • Re: PKCS 7 and the length of the EncryptedContent (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 07:24:22 CEST)
  • Re: PKCS 7 and the length of the EncryptedContent (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 06:26:30 CEST)
  • Re: PKCS 7 Test Vectors (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 05:54:27 CEST)
  • Re: PKCS 7 and the length of the EncryptedContent (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 05:00:37 CEST)
  • PKCS 7 Test Vectors (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 02:43:45 CEST)
  • Re: PKCS 7 and the length of the EncryptedContent (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 01:59:21 CEST)
  • Re: PKCS 7 and the length of the EncryptedContent (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 06:01:39 CEST)
  • Re: PKCS 7 and the length of the EncryptedContent (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 05:57:09 CEST)
  • PKCS 7 and the length of the EncryptedContent (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 02:57:53 CEST)
• Jan Panteltje
  • DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:17:00 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 16:32:24 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 13:11:58 CEST)
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:54:51 CEST)
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:24:49 CEST)
• Jan Peter Stotz
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 11:42:34 CEST)
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 10:56:54 CEST)
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 18:41:49 CEST)
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 15:42:14 CEST)
  • Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 14:28:53 CEST)
• jarubiob@gmail.com
  • Braid groups (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 00:00:52 CEST)
• Jay C. James
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 23:17:20 CEST)
• jaysome
  • Re: 2nd Underhanded C Contest Begins (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 12:34:33 CEST)
• Jean Easter
  • TIRIS S2000 readers - ascii supplement (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 15:47:29 CEST)
• Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:56:55 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:15:51 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 11:44:01 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:24:39 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 22:04:49 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:39:19 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:46:08 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:39:34 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 18:04:23 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 16:31:05 CEST)
• Jeff Jacoby
  • Re: PKCS 7 Test Vectors (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 16:43:14 CEST)
• Jim Watt
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 09:25:16 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 19:08:05 CEST)
• JJ
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 02:42:37 CEST)
• Joe Estock
  • Re: 2nd Underhanded C Contest Begins (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 03:17:14 CEST)
• joes
  • Re: Rotor crypto devices: 2N+1 vs Reflector ... how does this impact the "flatness" of the enciphered output? (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:14:56 CEST)
• John Bailey
  • Re: Encryption device (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 00:59:29 CEST)
• John Savard
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:49:46 CEST)
  • Overly-Secure Encryption Mode (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 07:34:39 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:22:10 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:12:53 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:02:56 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 12:54:58 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 02:22:54 CEST)
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 16:20:45 CEST)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier Gets It Wrong (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 16:20:01 CEST)
• John Smith
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 08:14:00 CEST)
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 07:58:37 CEST)
  • MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 11:50:57 CEST)
• johnrthomas756@yahoo.co.uk
  • Software protection (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 17:04:15 CEST)
• Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 07:42:55 CEST)
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 04:12:22 CEST)
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:21:53 CEST)
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 15:46:48 CEST)
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 00:49:00 CEST)
  • Re: getting nth prime (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 08:09:48 CEST)
  • Re: getting nth prime (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 04:27:16 CEST)
  • Re: Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 11:21:48 CEST)
  • Re: Breaking RSA (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 11:04:04 CEST)
  • Re: Chaffing and deniability in pencil-and-paper ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 08:00:28 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 08:00:27 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 13:26:31 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 02:09:44 CEST)
  • Re: Secure browser-based storage on an untrusted server? (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 01:19:07 CEST)
  • Re: Question about RSA encrypt/decrypt (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 05:51:14 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 13:29:54 CEST)
  • Re: Question about RSA encrypt/decrypt (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 03:17:53 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 02:26:34 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 07:31:21 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 06:43:37 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection solution (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 04:19:15 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Mon Apr 10 2006 - 00:35:31 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 07:47:10 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 02:20:31 CEST)
  • Re: Diffie Hellman sessions (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 00:46:33 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 00:16:17 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 20:01:49 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 20:01:49 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 13:11:38 CEST)
  • Re: small and portable library for pke (Sun Apr 02 2006 - 03:43:03 CEST)
  • Re: WPA/WEP key discovery time (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 00:56:22 CEST)
• José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 08:36:11 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 23:31:26 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 16:36:29 CEST)
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 10:04:06 CEST)
• jshsucks@yahoo.com
  • Re: JSH: Latest factoring idea, might work (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:35:35 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:30:23 CEST)
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 03:41:59 CEST)
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:53:16 CEST)
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:56:17 CEST)
  • Re: Goldbach, quadratic residues, brainstorming (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 19:23:31 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 18:30:29 CEST)
• jstevh@msn.com
  • Re: Latest factoring idea, might work (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 20:39:08 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:09:29 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:13:23 CEST)
  • JSH: Latest factoring idea, might work (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:07:48 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 17:22:46 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 17:15:00 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 03:03:41 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 02:55:43 CEST)
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 22:34:02 CEST)
  • Factoring method with quad res result? (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 22:23:11 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 18:40:46 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 18:29:12 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:50:17 CEST)
  • Quadratic residues and factoring (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 02:57:01 CEST)
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 05:38:09 CEST)
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:36:13 CEST)
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 08:58:49 CEST)
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 08:54:19 CEST)
  • SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 03:14:17 CEST)
  • Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 02:09:22 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 04:33:13 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sun Apr 23 2006 - 18:24:13 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 21:41:10 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:47:58 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 16:45:20 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 07:38:03 CEST)
  • Quadratic residue method for finding primes (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:55:06 CEST)
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 01:49:49 CEST)
  • Quickly finding large primes (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 15:16:40 CEST)
  • Surrogate factoring, corrected equations (Tue Apr 11 2006 - 04:03:50 CEST)
• Justin
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 14:03:51 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:48:43 CEST)
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 04:19:31 CEST)
• karl malbrain
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:59:45 CEST)
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:55:05 CEST)
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:01:06 CEST)
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:43:33 CEST)
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 04:00:05 CEST)
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 01:24:42 CEST)
  • Tiny table AES implementation (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:37:28 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 03:22:28 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 00:43:16 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 00:43:10 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:26:53 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:13:30 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:00:34 CEST)
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 19:17:10 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 20:16:51 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 19:16:53 CEST)
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 18:57:10 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:43:31 CEST)
  • Re: authentication (SRP*, DH, TLS) (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 20:17:34 CEST)
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 19:17:53 CEST)
• Kevin Buhr
  • Re: see how clever you are?(decrypt) (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 21:09:20 CEST)
• kevin.tambascio@gmail.com
  • Re: Question about RSA encrypt/decrypt (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 05:39:34 CEST)
  • Re: Question about RSA encrypt/decrypt (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 18:40:55 CEST)
  • Question about RSA encrypt/decrypt (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 00:10:07 CEST)
• Kim G. S. Øyhus
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:50:44 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:42:41 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:35:49 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:28:20 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:30:43 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:26:25 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:21:34 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:19:09 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 23:08:07 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:38:06 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:30:36 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:01:54 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:53:42 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:30:33 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:26:57 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:13:28 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 19:57:54 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:27:01 CEST)
  • Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:27:05 CEST)
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 09:46:02 CEST)
• Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Encrypted configuration file? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 15:21:53 CEST)
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 14:41:23 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypted configuration file? (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 09:47:22 CEST)
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC (Wed Apr 26 2006 - 13:43:07 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:34:14 CEST)
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:07:26 CEST)
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 12:06:28 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:38:06 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:32:54 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:24:59 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:58:57 CEST)
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 09:34:19 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 14:08:49 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:25:59 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:51:20 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:46:24 CEST)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:23:03 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 21:26:38 CEST)
  • Re: Symmetric encryption scheme (Wed Apr 12 2006 - 18:24:36 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 23:26:09 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 21:49:13 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 13:40:29 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 13:28:51 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 21:19:51 CEST)
  • Re: Looking for a very fast key agreement system (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 21:12:59 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 12:02:41 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Sat Apr 08 2006 - 12:02:00 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 23:37:26 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 23:34:53 CEST)
  • Re: LRW's tweak values (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 23:14:12 CEST)
  • Re: Diffie Hellman sessions (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 22:42:50 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 21:31:55 CEST)
  • Re: Diffie Hellman sessions (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 10:18:49 CEST)
  • Re: Datatype-preserving encryption (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 09:40:19 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Fri Apr 07 2006 - 09:02:53 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 23:10:46 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 19:49:12 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 17:16:45 CEST)
  • Re: CTR and disk sector encryption (Thu Apr 06 2006 - 15:12:51 CEST)
  • Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ? (Tue Apr 04 2006 - 09:24:35 CEST)
  • Re: The Blum-Blum-Shub generator and a guessable seed (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 13:16:21 CEST)
  • Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ? (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 09:34:52 CEST)
• laicko
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 16:14:30 CEST)
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Fri Apr 28 2006 - 09:48:40 CEST)
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 17:42:57 CEST)
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:28:25 CEST)
  • is it sufficient to solve factoring problem (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 08:01:49 CEST)
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 03:05:49 CEST)
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 03:05:49 CEST)
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 15:27:26 CEST)
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 09:39:22 CEST)
  • How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function (Mon Apr 24 2006 - 05:35:03 CEST)
• Lan Nguyen
  • International Conference on Cryptology in Vietnam (VietCrypt) 2006!!! (Mon Apr 03 2006 - 04:43:11 CEST)
• Larry Hammick
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring (Sat Apr 29 2006 - 04:33:16 CEST)
• larryhammick@telus.net
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes (Sat Apr 22 2006 - 07:01:49 CEST)
• laura fairhead
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 22:53:58 CEST)
• lee.reeves@gmail.com
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 03:51:00 CEST)
  • Re: Secure browser-based storage on an untrusted server? (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 02:20:55 CEST)
  • Re: Secure browser-based storage on an untrusted server? (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 02:02:29 CEST)
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 01:35:33 CEST)
  • Secure browser-based storage on an untrusted server? (Sat Apr 15 2006 - 00:31:46 CEST)
  • Encrypting Unicode (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 04:39:32 CEST)
• leeran
  • New newsgroup Cryptography updated daily visit (Wed Apr 05 2006 - 12:06:32 CEST)
• liletian@gmail.com
  • Quantum Dot laser in MidInfr ared applications Sources for Bio applications (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 19:57:37 CEST)
• MacCrest
  • Re: crypto and the mafia (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:59:38 CEST)
  • Re: MT5 as a replacement for MD5 (Thu Apr 13 2006 - 01:53:38 CEST)
• Manuel Pancorbo Castro
  • "Da Vinci" judge and unexpected crypto challenge (Thu Apr 27 2006 - 21:28:18 CEST)
• marcus_b
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method (Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:56:29 CEST)
• Mark
  • Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 17:57:29 CEST)
• Mark Atherton
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:43:06 CEST)
• Mark Lomas
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? (Sun Apr 30 2006 - 23:18:24 CEST)
• Markus Jansson
  • Re: Need simpler encryption program than PGP (Sun Apr 09 2006 - 07:48:57 CEST)
• Matthew Harrison
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 05:28:41 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 05:25:24 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:25:06 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:16:37 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:14:24 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:52:42 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:51:16 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:50:21 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:40:29 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:31:31 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:28:54 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:04:44 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:03:11 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 17:00:43 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 16:57:26 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 16:23:58 CEST)
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 15:57:53 CEST)
  • Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 15:37:18 CEST)
• Max Power
  • Rotor crypto devices: 2N+1 vs Reflector ... how does this impact the "flatness"... (Thu Apr 20 2006 - 06:06:14 CEST)
  • Rotor crypto devices: 2N+1 vs Reflector ... how does this impact the "flatness" of the enciphered output? (Fri Apr 14 2006 - 04:46:45 CEST)
• mcltunes
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 23:00:19 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 22:26:42 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:32:23 CEST)
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? (Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:11:57 CEST)
• Me
  • Re: My symbol is the universial symbol of Christinity -- an 8-pointed star inside a triangle ... (Sat Apr 01 2006 - 17:26:50 CEST)
• Michael Brown
  • Re: Software protection (Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:45:08 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Mon Apr 17 2006 - 16:48:36 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 14:52:12 CEST)
  • Re: Software protection (Sun Apr 16 2006 - 07:05:40 CEST)
• michaeld