sci.crypt archive

• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 23:18:24 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? Mark Lomas 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 22:49:37 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? Unruh 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 22:34:22 CEST
  • Re: Latest factoring idea, might work Gib Bogle 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 21:40:28 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? David Wagner 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 21:36:06 CEST
  • ROSETTA DEVICE-believe your eyes, and use your brain, and close your fucking ,mouths nerrat73@netscape.net 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 21:25:47 CEST
  • reminder nerrat73@netscape.net 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 21:20:33 CEST
  • Continuation:Competition. nerrat73@netscape.net 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 21:11:40 CEST
  • Re: Latest factoring idea, might work Unruh 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 21:09:24 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? Unruh 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 20:39:08 CEST
  • Re: Latest factoring idea, might work jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:59:32 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? cody.roux@gmail.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:36:54 CEST
  • 6th-and the pitch! Serenity 129 nerrat73@netscape.net 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:35:35 CEST
  • Re: JSH: Latest factoring idea, might work jshsucks@yahoo.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:30:23 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jshsucks@yahoo.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:27:25 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:25:50 CEST
  • Re: Latest factoring idea, might work Dave Turner 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:22:58 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? David Wagner 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:20:17 CEST
  • Re: COMPETITION nerrat73@netscape.net 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 19:09:29 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:50:47 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:43:06 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? Mark Atherton 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:26:09 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? David Wagner 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:13:23 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:07:48 CEST
  • JSH: Latest factoring idea, might work jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 18:04:28 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? Gib Bogle 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 17:22:46 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 17:15:00 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 15:21:53 CEST
  • Re: Encrypted configuration file? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 14:41:23 CEST
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 14:03:51 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? Justin 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 13:38:47 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 13:19:14 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? daniel bleichenbacher 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 13:01:04 CEST
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA daniel bleichenbacher 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 11:42:34 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Jan Peter Stotz 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 10:56:54 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Jan Peter Stotz 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 09:48:58 CEST
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA nathan@swerling.de 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 08:36:11 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? José Carlos Santos 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 07:42:55 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 07:31:03 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 07:29:48 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 07:28:39 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 06:24:35 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Ben Livengood 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 04:12:22 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Joseph Ashwood 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 03:03:41 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 02:55:43 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 30 2006 - 00:35:38 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? Rob 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 23:31:26 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? José Carlos Santos 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 23:28:31 CEST
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA Mike Amling 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 22:34:02 CEST
  • Re: Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 22:23:11 CEST
  • Factoring method with quad res result? jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 21:02:40 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm David Wagner 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 20:51:01 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm David Wagner 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 20:24:52 CEST
  • Re: COMPETITION nerrat73@netscape.net 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 20:16:06 CEST
  • COMPETITION nerrat73@netscape.net 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 19:54:35 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Unruh 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 19:50:33 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Unruh 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 18:41:49 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Jan Peter Stotz 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 18:40:46 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 18:29:12 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 16:56:05 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Carlos Moreno 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 16:51:10 CEST
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA xmath 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 16:28:45 CEST
  • Re: Elliptic Curve RSA xmath 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 16:14:30 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem laicko 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 16:13:43 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Tuna Fish 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 15:42:14 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Jan Peter Stotz 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 15:30:17 CEST
  • Re: Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Carlos Moreno 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 15:15:28 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring David Eather 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 14:28:53 CEST
  • Searching for a special challenge&response algorithm Jan Peter Stotz 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 14:16:46 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 14:16:28 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 13:46:57 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 13:42:58 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 13:41:05 CEST
  • Elliptic Curve RSA hassan.jameel@gmail.com 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 13:41:00 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 13:07:42 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 12:54:35 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 12:47:24 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Dave Turner 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 12:30:07 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 12:23:06 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 11:44:45 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 11:36:28 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 11:11:22 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 11:06:26 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 10:25:59 CEST
  • Re: Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 10:11:55 CEST
  • Finally a safe and math accurate random64bit function ! ;) Skybuck Flying 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 08:26:05 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 Allan Herriman 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 04:33:16 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring Larry Hammick 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 03:06:35 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David Eather 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 02:42:37 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 JJ 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 01:30:47 CEST
  • Semi-OT: "The Smithy Code" Paul Rubin 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:55:32 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 Austin Lesea 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:24:19 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:15:42 CEST
  • 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Dr John Stockton 
• Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:08:39 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 Paul Rubin 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 23:02:42 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 c d saunter 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 22:55:18 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 22:48:37 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 22:39:41 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 c d saunter 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 22:28:54 CEST
  • Re: Encrypted configuration file? Ed Weir \(ComCast\) 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 22:28:31 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 Paul Rubin 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:50:00 CEST
  • Re: Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:48:10 CEST
  • Re: DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:46:34 CEST
  • Re: Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm Unruh 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:20:57 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:17:00 CEST
  • DRC has announced its newest FPGA that drops into AMD's Socket 940 Jan Panteltje 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:14:45 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 21:01:37 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:48:43 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring Justin 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:48:35 CEST
  • Re: gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:45:18 CEST
  • Re: Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:41:56 CEST
  • Re: Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm Mike Amling 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:10:56 CEST
  • Re: Encrypted configuration file? Mike Amling 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 20:10:28 CEST
  • gnupg rsa question // why use e of 41 ? vedaal 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 19:44:23 CEST
  • Looking for EXPTIME-algorithm filia&sofia 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 19:01:17 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher ashish.sharma.ait@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 18:54:55 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 18:54:40 CEST
  • Re: Encryption device ashish.sharma.ait@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 18:40:57 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 18:21:39 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring W. Dale Hall 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 17:12:22 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem mm 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 16:36:29 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring José Carlos Santos 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 15:11:33 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 14:10:36 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David Eather 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 14:02:48 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 13:54:46 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher David Eather 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 13:31:32 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 13:20:03 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 13:17:13 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:55:09 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! giorgio.tani 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:50:28 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:36:32 CEST
  • getting Numbers Dhairyas 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:30:47 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:27:31 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Dhairyas 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 11:42:06 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 11:28:58 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 11:21:42 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 11:04:02 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 10:55:58 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 10:28:00 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Volker Hetzer 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 10:15:11 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 10:07:34 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 09:48:40 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem laicko 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 09:47:22 CEST
  • Re: Encrypted configuration file? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 09:44:24 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring michaeld 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 08:52:43 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 08:21:29 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 07:42:32 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Rob Warnock 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 07:23:02 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:50:17 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring jstevh@msn.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:49:16 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Mike Warren 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:44:03 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Mike Warren 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:22:44 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher hugonz@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:21:53 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:16:43 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:09:29 CEST
  • Re: Question about RSA encrypt/decrypt tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 06:05:10 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 05:51:17 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Mike Warren 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 05:39:34 CEST
  • Re: Question about RSA encrypt/decrypt kevin.tambascio@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 05:31:01 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 05:21:31 CEST
  • Re: 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 05:11:57 CEST
  • 63/64 bit version of Delphi's function random( aRange : integer ) : integer; ? Skybuck Flying 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 05:11:04 CEST
  • Re: "Da Vinci" judge and unexpected crypto challenge Roger Schlafly 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 04:58:35 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David A. Scott 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 04:19:31 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residues and factoring Justin 
• Fri Apr 28 2006 - 02:57:01 CEST
  • Quadratic residues and factoring jstevh@msn.com 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 23:12:14 CEST
  • Re: "Da Vinci" judge and unexpected crypto challenge FatKat 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 22:39:04 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher hugonz@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 22:30:31 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher TC 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 22:11:29 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher hugonz@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 21:28:18 CEST
  • "Da Vinci" judge and unexpected crypto challenge Manuel Pancorbo Castro 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 21:09:31 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David Eather 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 21:04:37 CEST
  • Encrypted configuration file? mike3 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:56:55 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:56:24 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:51:27 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Christian Siebert 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:35:37 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Volker Hetzer 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:15:21 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Mike Amling 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:07:52 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher TC 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 18:42:04 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Christian Siebert 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 18:27:31 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem mm 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 18:00:07 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 17:51:00 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 17:49:58 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 17:42:57 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem laicko 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 17:38:49 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 17:30:36 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Volker Hetzer 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:41:22 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher TC 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:40:15 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Volker Hetzer 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:28:25 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem laicko 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:22:20 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Volker Hetzer 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:21:09 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:18:09 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Einstein 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:15:33 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem mm 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 16:14:58 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Einstein 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 15:46:48 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Joseph Ashwood 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 14:52:13 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David A. Scott 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 14:48:55 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Christian Siebert 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 13:22:33 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! none 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 12:25:46 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher David Eather 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 12:23:46 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David Eather 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 12:15:28 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem mm 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 11:03:01 CEST
  • Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem Christian Siebert 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 09:45:13 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Rob Warnock 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 08:01:49 CEST
  • is it sufficient to solve factoring problem laicko 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 06:31:12 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Einstein 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 06:10:09 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation richa 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 04:52:12 CEST
  • Re: JavaScrypt Encryption & Decryption - Codegroup bias? roger_for_nntp@hotmail.com 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 01:40:35 CEST
  • JavaScrypt Encryption & Decryption - Codegroup bias? frogstar 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 00:55:42 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher David Wagner 
• Thu Apr 27 2006 - 00:49:00 CEST
  • Re: Implementing byte stream cipher Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 23:55:30 CEST
  • Implementing byte stream cipher hugonz@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 23:01:45 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 22:53:36 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC rossum 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 22:21:42 CEST
  • Re: Question about SHA1 result length Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 22:10:47 CEST
  • Question about SHA1 result length DERASN.1@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 20:09:37 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method noload 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 19:35:15 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC Francois Grieu 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 19:34:58 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method noload 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 18:48:39 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Pubkeybreaker 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 17:49:34 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Einstein 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 17:44:03 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC xmath 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:57:00 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC xmath 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:49:46 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers John Savard 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:38:34 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:34:51 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Dhairyas 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:29:32 CEST
  • Re: Overly-Secure Encryption Mode Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:17:05 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:15:51 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:14:26 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC xmath 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 15:07:19 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 14:46:43 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC Francois Grieu 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 14:32:33 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC xmath 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 14:17:46 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 13:43:07 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 12:57:19 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? Richard Herring 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 12:08:45 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 11:02:10 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David Eather 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 10:57:41 CEST
  • Re: DES 10 Byte MAC David Eather 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 10:20:04 CEST
  • DES 10 Byte MAC friebal@gmx-topmail.de 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 07:34:39 CEST
  • Overly-Secure Encryption Mode John Savard 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 07:07:58 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method guenther vonKnakspot 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 05:38:09 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method jstevh@msn.com 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 04:52:46 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method noload 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 04:40:43 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 03:41:59 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method jshsucks@yahoo.com 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 03:23:49 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties David Wagner 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:58:51 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:57:47 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:39:39 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 02:36:13 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method jstevh@msn.com 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 01:21:53 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Henrick Hellström 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 01:04:34 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? Ed Weir \(ComCast\) 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:58:43 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:51:50 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Henrick Hellström 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:46:36 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:37:15 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:33:55 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties David Wagner 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:31:56 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS David Wagner 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:31:06 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:29:22 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Henrick Hellström 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 23:47:58 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 23:27:03 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Unruh 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 23:11:59 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Mike Amling 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 23:03:02 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 22:46:17 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Carlos Moreno 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 22:28:42 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Henrick Hellström 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 22:08:48 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 21:41:29 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:53:16 CEST
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues jshsucks@yahoo.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:31:41 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:28:39 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:24:13 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:11:12 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Henrick Hellström 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 20:10:02 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 19:48:40 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Unruh 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 19:43:51 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 19:36:43 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 19:13:07 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:56:29 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method marcus_b 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:55:34 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS David Wagner 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:48:48 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:44:17 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Henrick Hellström 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:36:43 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:12:27 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Paul Rubin 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:10:33 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:58:21 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Unruh 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:48:28 CEST
  • Re: product of n successive positive integers Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:34:14 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:21:51 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:14:33 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:10:40 CEST
  • product of n successive positive integers Sarad AV 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:07:26 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 17:01:28 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 16:36:13 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Richard Revis 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 16:33:29 CEST
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub Cristiano 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 16:24:16 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS David Wagner 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 16:21:03 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 15:34:20 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 15:15:06 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Paul Rubin 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 15:07:15 CEST
  • Re: why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 15:02:15 CEST
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 14:02:49 CEST
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub Cristiano 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 13:30:43 CEST
  • Re: Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 12:56:48 CEST
  • why we have to do first Encryption and then Authentication in PKCS Network Evangelists 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 12:46:34 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Pubkeybreaker 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 11:44:01 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 10:04:06 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method José Carlos Santos 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 08:58:49 CEST
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues jstevh@msn.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 08:54:19 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method jstevh@msn.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 08:14:51 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Phil Carmody 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 08:09:48 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 07:54:42 CEST
  • Re: JSH: Hyperbolic factoring method Tim Peters 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 07:24:45 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Francois Grieu 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:56:17 CEST
  • Re: SF: Hyperbolic factoring method jshsucks@yahoo.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:39:47 CEST
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues mm 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:31:09 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties David Wagner 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:14:16 CEST
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues willo_thewisp@hotmail.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:04:33 CEST
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues mm 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 04:27:16 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Joseph Ashwood 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 03:34:27 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 03:14:17 CEST
  • SF: Hyperbolic factoring method jstevh@msn.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 03:05:49 CEST
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function laicko 
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function laicko 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 02:09:22 CEST
  • Goldbach's conjecture and quadratic residues jstevh@msn.com 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 01:49:15 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 00:56:31 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 00:34:53 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 00:25:28 CEST
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture Tuna Fish 
• Tue Apr 25 2006 - 00:08:51 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties David Wagner 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 23:18:38 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 23:15:26 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:59:38 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime rossum 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:42:26 CEST
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:40:08 CEST
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:37:27 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 22:24:39 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:50:49 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:49:24 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:36:38 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Phil Carmody 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:30:10 CEST
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography Phil Carmody 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 21:18:48 CEST
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography Phil Carmody 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 20:50:01 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 20:06:05 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime pegguru@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 19:53:31 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 19:07:07 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 19:04:22 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Christian Siebert 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 18:49:44 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime Ben Rudiak-Gould 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 18:08:59 CEST
  • Re: tools for lecture nemo_outis 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 17:51:02 CEST
  • Re: getting nth prime tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 17:16:23 CEST
  • tools for lecture securenix 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 17:00:09 CEST
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function David Wagner 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 16:55:41 CEST
  • getting nth prime Dhairyas 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 16:29:56 CEST
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography Roger Schlafly 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 16:09:58 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Eather 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 15:47:16 CEST
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography David A. Scott 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 15:27:26 CEST
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function laicko 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 13:07:55 CEST
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 13:05:56 CEST
  • Re: Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? Pubkeybreaker 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 10:31:03 CEST
  • Algebraic Geometric Codes aarthi28@gmail.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 09:44:15 CEST
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function David Wagner 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 09:39:22 CEST
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function laicko 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 08:30:01 CEST
  • Re: Controversy in Cryptography David Wagner 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 07:56:14 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes Bob Terwilliger 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 07:49:07 CEST
  • Controversy in Cryptography Terry Ritter 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 07:33:33 CEST
  • Re: Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? dan 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 06:22:34 CEST
  • Re: Goldbach, quadratic residues, brainstorming Fred Head 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 06:14:14 CEST
  • Re: How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function David Wagner 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 05:35:03 CEST
  • How to construct such one-way key chain without hash function laicko 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 04:33:13 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 03:22:43 CEST
  • Re: aes Tuna Fish 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 03:21:57 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes Bob Terwilliger 
• Mon Apr 24 2006 - 03:09:32 CEST
  • aes bob@coolgroups.com 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 21:59:52 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Simon Johnson 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 19:27:44 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes none 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 19:23:31 CEST
  • Re: Goldbach, quadratic residues, brainstorming jshsucks@yahoo.com 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 18:24:13 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 17:21:23 CEST
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture Tuna Fish 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 17:00:09 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers duoduolei@gmail.com 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 16:59:06 CEST
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture Jack Linthicum 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 16:36:49 CEST
  • Re: A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture Tuna Fish 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 16:29:57 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? Carlos Moreno 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 16:11:15 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Tuna Fish 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 11:17:20 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes none 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 07:36:09 CEST
  • Re: Seeking entropy article by Whatsisname Paul Rubin 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 06:01:12 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Francois Grieu 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 05:58:37 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 05:13:13 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question tor@nwo.no 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 04:15:59 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? Roger Schlafly 
• Sun Apr 23 2006 - 00:14:26 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? David Wagner 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 21:50:36 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? Roger Schlafly 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 21:41:10 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 21:08:24 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes Arturo Magidin 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 20:16:11 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? David Wagner 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 20:09:41 CEST
  • Re: Seeking entropy article by Whatsisname Roger Schlafly 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:53:00 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? clark 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:47:58 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:19:27 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 19:14:54 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? David Wagner 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 18:48:18 CEST
  • DES für X11 Thorsten Kiefer 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 18:30:29 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes jshsucks@yahoo.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 16:45:20 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 13:57:51 CEST
  • A Break for Code Breakers on Kryptos C.I.A. Sculpture jacklinthicum@earthlink.net 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 12:06:28 CEST
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 11:35:02 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Simon Johnson 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 09:54:52 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes Bob Terwilliger 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 07:38:03 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 07:14:45 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes Arturo Magidin 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 07:01:49 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes larryhammick@telus.net 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 06:37:53 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 06:34:25 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 05:09:26 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! sillybanter@gmail.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 03:27:46 CEST
  • Re: LibTomCrypt ASN.1... tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 02:21:36 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Unruh 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 02:10:16 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes mm 
• Sat Apr 22 2006 - 01:03:03 CEST
  • Re: Blum Blum Shub Simon Johnson 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 23:54:56 CEST
  • Blum Blum Shub mike7411@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 23:14:49 CEST
  • Re: public-key crypto description from 19th century?! Roger Schlafly 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 23:04:46 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 23:00:19 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? mcltunes 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 22:50:38 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 22:26:42 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? mcltunes 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 22:04:49 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:40:48 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:38:06 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:36:02 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:32:23 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? mcltunes 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:28:09 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Unruh 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:24:04 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:23:06 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Francois Grieu 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:20:45 CEST
  • Re: AES and cache bank tricks tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:15:19 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:14:52 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 21:06:06 CEST
  • AES and cache bank tricks tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:59:45 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation karl malbrain 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:55:05 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation karl malbrain 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:48:54 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:46:30 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Ben Livengood 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:36:09 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:32:54 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:24:59 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:14:10 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:11:57 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? mcltunes 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:01:06 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation karl malbrain 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:58:57 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:51:47 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:43:33 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation karl malbrain 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:30:45 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:24:58 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? Carlos Moreno 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 19:08:56 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 18:59:30 CEST
  • Re: Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? clark 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 18:10:50 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 18:08:02 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes Phil Carmody 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 17:57:29 CEST
  • Is there a SHA1PRNG standard? Mark 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 17:29:33 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 17:21:34 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability xmath 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 14:51:19 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! David Eather 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 12:53:08 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. Jack Linthicum 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 12:27:03 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? Richard Herring 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 12:14:49 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties Henrick Hellström 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 12:03:39 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Francois Grieu 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 11:21:48 CEST
  • Re: Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? Joseph Ashwood 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 09:34:19 CEST
  • Re: EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 08:26:08 CEST
  • Can DLP be reduced to fatroing problem or vice versa? dan 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 07:19:28 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. Fred J. McCall 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 06:55:22 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes Bob Terwilliger 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 05:53:55 CEST
  • Re: Quadratic residue method for finding primes mm 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 05:45:34 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes willo_thewisp@hotmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 05:23:03 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 05:14:44 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 04:00:05 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation karl malbrain 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 03:43:54 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. roger_for_nntp@hotmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 03:31:57 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 03:27:38 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. David Wagner 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 03:03:26 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? Paul Rubin 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:55:12 CEST
  • EC-IES, authentication and plausible deniability fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:55:06 CEST
  • Quadratic residue method for finding primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:47:56 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? roger_for_nntp@hotmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:28:01 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes mm 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:25:53 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:13:49 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 02:05:54 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties Henrick Hellström 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 01:49:49 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 01:24:42 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation karl malbrain 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 01:21:47 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 01:17:56 CEST
  • Re: Tiny table AES implementation tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:37:30 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:37:28 CEST
  • Tiny table AES implementation karl malbrain 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:30:10 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Fri Apr 21 2006 - 00:18:11 CEST
  • Re: PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties David Wagner 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 23:52:10 CEST
  • PK Key exchange scheme involving 3 parties fabrice.gautier@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 21:12:15 CEST
  • Re: public-key crypto description from 19th century?! Paul Rubin 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:39:19 CEST
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:37:10 CEST
  • public-key crypto description from 19th century?! Paul Rubin 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:22:10 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers John Savard 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:12:53 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers John Savard 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 20:02:56 CEST
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode John Savard 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 18:37:39 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes David Eather 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:55:02 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:51:28 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes mm 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:22:11 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. Fred J. McCall 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:20:22 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. Fred J. McCall 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:19:49 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:19:11 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. Fred J. McCall 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 17:14:08 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Einstein 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:52:36 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:32:40 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers noload 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:28:20 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. fredfighter@spamcop.net 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:16:43 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? David Eather 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 16:02:23 CEST
  • Don't be a fool: stay in school! Adam Funk 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 15:53:47 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... Stefan Tillich 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 15:31:58 CEST
  • Re: Quickly finding large primes tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 15:16:40 CEST
  • Quickly finding large primes jstevh@msn.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 14:08:49 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 14:04:02 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. Jack Linthicum 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:50:44 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:42:41 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:35:49 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 13:25:59 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 12:47:51 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers duoduolei@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 12:47:47 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers duoduolei@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 12:39:39 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers duoduolei@gmail.com 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 12:01:50 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Richard Revis 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 11:11:35 CEST
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode Gian-Carlo Pascutto 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:39:46 CEST
  • Re: US Navy could be crippled by software backdoors. Fred J. McCall 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:36:53 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers David Wagner 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:30:32 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:28:20 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 10:27:14 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:51:20 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:32:09 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:30:43 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:26:42 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:26:25 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:24:53 CEST
  • KMOALEXT on ollut liian alykas .. Intel Corp on vetanyt OHARIT !!! The Brigadier 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:21:34 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:19:09 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 08:23:36 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... BRG 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 08:13:02 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... BRG 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 07:43:31 CEST
  • Re: Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked Alex Vinokur 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 06:06:14 CEST
  • Rotor crypto devices: 2N+1 vs Reflector ... how does this impact the "flatness"... Max Power 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 03:22:28 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... karl malbrain 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 02:40:57 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... Mike Amling 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 02:30:03 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... Mike Amling 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 02:18:28 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Mike Amling 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 01:54:29 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Mike Amling 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 00:43:16 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... karl malbrain 
• Thu Apr 20 2006 - 00:43:10 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... karl malbrain 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 23:39:51 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 23:25:33 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Unruh 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 23:17:20 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? Jay C. James 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 23:08:07 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:54:55 CEST
  • Ephemeral Keys with stunnel NeedHelp 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:50:22 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:46:24 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:38:06 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:30:36 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:28:01 CEST
  • Re: Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked Douglas A. Gwyn 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 22:00:25 CEST
  • Re: Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked Volker Hetzer 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:52:35 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Ben Livengood 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:51:54 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Volker Hetzer 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:45:59 CEST
  • Re: Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:43:50 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Unruh 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:40:33 CEST
  • Re: Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked Unruh 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:37:19 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:35:29 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... BRG 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:34:33 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:26:53 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... karl malbrain 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:23:03 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kristian Gjøsteen 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:20:40 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:18:42 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... BRG 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 21:01:54 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:59:38 CEST
  • Re: crypto and the mafia MacCrest 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:53:42 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:46:08 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:39:34 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Jean-Luc Cooke 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:36:24 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:30:33 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:26:57 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:14:40 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:13:30 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... karl malbrain 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:13:28 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:04:49 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:01:52 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:00:34 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... karl malbrain 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:00:26 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 19:57:54 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 19:44:12 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 19:17:10 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... karl malbrain 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:54:07 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers noload 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:47:42 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Ed Weir \(ComCast\) 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:36:20 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:27:01 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:13:24 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? Ed Weir \(ComCast\) 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:08:48 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers clark 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 17:47:49 CEST
  • Check if crypto encoding/decoding method can be cracked Alex Vinokur 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 17:29:34 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 17:27:22 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 17:23:10 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! none 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:48:48 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Francois Grieu 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:47:23 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:47:09 CEST
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers David Wagner 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 16:27:05 CEST
  • Weakness of Feistel ciphers Kim G. S. Øyhus 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:28:13 CEST
  • Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP? David Eather 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:25:30 CEST
  • Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems? David Eather 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:13:06 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! Einstein 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 14:03:39 CEST
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode David Eather 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 12:54:58 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question John Savard 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 12:40:39 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 11:34:45 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Francois Grieu 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 11:04:42 CEST
  • Re: Breaking RSA contini@matmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 11:04:04 CEST
  • Re: Breaking RSA Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 10:53:38 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 10:11:01 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Unruh 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 09:47:13 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Francois Grieu 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 09:16:51 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Francois Grieu 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 08:00:28 CEST
  • Re: Chaffing and deniability in pencil-and-paper ciphers Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 08:00:27 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Joseph Ashwood 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 07:18:42 CEST
  • Re: RSA Security Hiring Announcement SoP 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 06:57:03 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question roger_for_nntp@hotmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 05:36:17 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Paul Rubin 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 05:28:41 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Matthew Harrison 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 05:25:24 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Matthew Harrison 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 05:10:12 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... rohit 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 05:08:08 CEST
  • Re: Compression leads to encryption NEW COMPRESSION METHOD! sillybanter@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 04:49:13 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Mike Amling 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 04:16:37 CEST
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 04:10:24 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question David Wagner 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 03:51:00 CEST
  • Re: Encrypting Unicode lee.reeves@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 03:47:54 CEST
  • Re: ECC template library tomstdenis@gmail.com 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 03:03:43 CEST
  • Re: ECC template library Ben Livengood 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 02:25:07 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 02:06:23 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Bill Unruh 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:58:08 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Ben Livengood 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:25:06 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Matthew Harrison 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:18:42 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Unruh 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:16:37 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Matthew Harrison 
• Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:14:24 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Matthew Harrison 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 22:55:45 CEST
  • crypto and the mafia Paul Rubin 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 20:44:31 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Unruh 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 20:43:17 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Unruh 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 20:42:09 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Unruh 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 19:57:37 CEST
  • Quantum Dot laser in MidInfr ared applications Sources for Bio applications liletian@gmail.com 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 19:39:09 CEST
  • Re: AES Timing Attack Implementation & Karl Malbrain code... Mike Amling 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 19:08:00 CEST
  • Chaffing and deniability in pencil-and-paper ciphers gschultz@clearcreek.com 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 18:46:02 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question pegguru@gmail.com 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 18:22:23 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question tor@nwo.no 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 18:15:22 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question Sebastian Gottschalk 
• Tue Apr 18 2006 - 18:09:01 CEST
  • Re: Complex Theoretic