Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour"

tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> Crypto@S.M.S wrote:
> > > 1. You routinely add other groups as followup.
> >
> > Nothing wrong with cross-posting. Besides, I only re-posted
> > to the groups that Joseph Ashwood posted his original claims
> > and insults to. I did not originate the cross posting, so
> > please do not call me names because of it.
>
> Get this straight. I don't care what he did.

Clearly you do, or you wouldn't defend such childish conduct.

> That's no excuse on
> your part to act like this.

Act like you? Agreed.

>
> > > 2. You won't accept anything as fact.
> >
> > I won't accept exaggerated claims as fact. No.
>
> You assume because something doesn't line up with your thoughts that
> it is exaggerated or overstated.

You talking to yourself in the mirror again, eh forger boy?

> You assume this because you don't
> know the first thing about cryptography.

Another pathetic and demonstrably false statement from Joe "the blow" Asswood's
errand boy.

>
> > > 3. You're intolerant of error.
> >
> > Pot Kettle Black.
>
> That's odd because I routinely help others, answer support emails for
> my free libraries, etc...

Funny.

>
> > > 4. You're ignorant and taking things out of context
> >
> > A.) You resorting to name calling again, and
> > B.) Nothing was taken out of context, it was quoted as posted.
>
> See Bryans post. You clearly mis-understood the text you yourself
> quoted.
>
> Nowhere did he say he can invert MD5 in an hour. He said
> [paraphrasing] that the way YOU USED md5 can be reversed in an hour.

So put up or shut up. Reverse it. It's been a few THOUSAND hours now,
surely you aren't that incompetent, are you? ... or are you simply a lying
jackass?

>
> > > 5. You're not offering anything to the group yet causing a lot of
> > > traffic.
> >
> > I was invited here by Joseph Ashwood's original email.
>
> There are no invitations. You can come and go as you please. If you
> have a qualm with Joseph then take it up with him.

So shut the fuck up about a conversation you hysterically claim to
want no part of. Who's forcing you to read or reply to these posts?

>
> What? Do you think you're convincing me that you're mature enough to
> write a stable piece of software? Somehow I think you're not seeing
> the bigger picture.

That your opinion is utterly worthless in the "big picture" ....?

>
> > Tom, wasn't it you who just recently wrote something about tearing
> > others down? And how those that do are, what did you call them,
> > "jealous and embarassed", isn't that what you wrote? So what do
> > you call it when somebody does exactly what they just told others
> > not to do?
>
> I'm not on a rampage against the half-breed that spammed my name all
> over usenet.

What's a "half-breed" ?

> I'm mature enough to just deal with it

ROTFLMAO!

> and do my own
> thing [like yesterday I wrote a userspace virtual lan for Linux that
> can join multiple hosts together using PROPER cryptography].

Wow, wotta kewl dood you must be.

>
> > If you don't like my posts, why don't you do like John Hadstate,
> > and enforce your own version of reality by using a kill file?
>
> Because I use google and it doesn't have a killfile.

Awwww, poor baby. You get what you pay for, moron.

> Besides that
> just because killfiles exists is not an invitation to act out because
> you want to throw a temper tantrum.

So tell us again, who's forcing you to read, much less reply, to these
posts?

>
> Tom
Received on Thu Sep 29 21:52:32 2005