Re: Advice needed regarding SHA0 SHA1 MD5
Available news archives: comp.lang.tcl - comp.lang.python - comp.security.firewalls - sci.crypt - comp.lang.php - comp.lang.javascript
Google
 
Web news.hping.org


sci.crypt archive

Re: Advice needed regarding SHA0 SHA1 MD5

From: <tomstdenis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Sep 08 2005 - 01:11:20 CEST

Crypto@SMS wrote:
> Not everyone is that lazy when it comes to security. Get it?

Hahahhaa, that's cute.

Had you EVER had a consulting gig you'd know that customers cut corners
in EVERYTHING. Crypto is no exception.

> With CryptoSMS you do NOT have to type the pass phrase every
> time you write a message. You enter it at the start of the
> CryptoSMS conversation, and all subsequent messages exchanged
> use the same keys. Once the program exits, those keys are
> destroyed. CryptoSMS is a secure SMS chat client. You would
> know that if you had bothered to look.

Wait, every message uses the same key? Do you have a salt per message?
 How do you prevent replays?

This still doesn't address the user who uses "ade" as their password
because it's easy to type in one a phone ;-)

> I am only responding to your non-stop insults and put-downs,

My "insults" as you put it stop at the same time your shananigans
[can't believe I used that word] stop. Your actions become no less
valid or appropriate just because you protest the negative reaction it
attracts.

> even after you have repeatedly told others not to do the same.

The difference is I donate stuff of value to the community. At
**BEST** you're discussing a PRODUCT of value. The reality though is
it's a product of no value because it totally sidesteps proper key
negotiation.

People rag on me because they're sick of me talking about my free
projects which help thousands upon thousands of people. They're just
jealous because while they've wasted away their youth doing drugs,
veging in front of tv or playing some stupid MMORPG I taught myself
mathematics and cryptography.

Let's see you donate five years of your life to the public domain and
then see how well you adjust to having no-names come out of the dark
and rag on you.

> As long as you continue to post statements like "low-quality
> thought processes" I will continue to respond. You can "just
> let it go" at any time by dropping the ad-hominem remarks.

Clearly you're just too good to think on your own. I mean if you had
any business savvy you would have ended this discussion 1200 posts ago.

> What was it you said about people who feel the need to tear others down?

I don't need to tear you down. That's just sport at this point.

Tom
Received on Thu Sep 29 21:53:13 2005