Re: A Novel Radioactive Decay Algorithm in Cryptography

Volker Hetzer wrote:
> Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > A the words are common slang because your version of Mr Perfect
> > recitation is a known perveyor of simpleton open expression hate.
> >
> > Your version of thinking is the problem.
> >
> Sorry, line me up with Bill Unruh on this one.
> I also couldn't really understand it.
> Do you describe a decay based hardware RNG with some real radioactive
> stuff in it or some software RNG?
>
> And before you complain about my version of thinking, please
> consider what your objective here is.
> If you want to be understood it would be a great help if you used
> sentences structured the same way everyone else in this group does.
>
> Lots of Greetings!
> Volker

A long as your understanding is the issue I can re-explain a little.

A common method of radioactive decay, key application is altered. A
very short count time on the counter invalidates the method. A set of
counts with the statistical distribution is required.

And so the implication of the invalid, is the key. A true key is still
applied, except it is the decay constant as the key.

A transformation of the equation truely occurs because of the binomial
function present. My algorithm is a trivial algorithm, but it
identifies the change of the counting equation.

A short time caused the random distribution to simply disappear.
Received on Thu Sep 29 21:54:44 2005