Re: A Novel Radioactive Decay Algorithm in Cryptography

In article <1126722120.041969.226400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondouglas@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Volker Hetzer wrote:
> > Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> > > A the words are common slang because your version of Mr Perfect
> > > recitation is a known perveyor of simpleton open expression hate.
> > >
> > > Your version of thinking is the problem.
> > >
> > Sorry, line me up with Bill Unruh on this one.
> > I also couldn't really understand it.
> > Do you describe a decay based hardware RNG with some real radioactive
> > stuff in it or some software RNG?
> >
> > And before you complain about my version of thinking, please
> > consider what your objective here is.
> > If you want to be understood it would be a great help if you used
> > sentences structured the same way everyone else in this group does.
> >
> > Lots of Greetings!
> > Volker
>
>
> A long as your understanding is the issue I can re-explain a little.
>
> A common method of radioactive decay, key application is altered. A
> very short count time on the counter invalidates the method. A set of
> counts with the statistical distribution is required.
>
> And so the implication of the invalid, is the key. A true key is still
> applied, except it is the decay constant as the key.
>
> A transformation of the equation truely occurs because of the binomial
> function present. My algorithm is a trivial algorithm, but it
> identifies the change of the counting equation.
>
> A short time caused the random distribution to simply disappear.
>
*brilliant* You *are* a PRNG and I collect my £5.

-- 
To de-mung my e-mail address:- fsnospam$elliott$$
PGP Fingerprint: 1A96 3CF7 637F 896B C810  E199 7E5C A9E4 8E59 E248