"Stephen K. Gielda" <steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote in message
news:MPG.1df5a73617424b1c989be7@news.newsreader.com...
> In article <162pjbgbf3qvb.xty3y7jl7zhh.dlg@40tude.net>,
> abcarisilversteinn@yahoo.comxyz says...
>> Scenario:
>>
>> 1,000 email discussion list users who are trading information regarding
>> private health issues in women and children who have been victimized by
>> domestic violence. The information does not contain SSN or ID by name
>> (HIPAA compliant), each user wants to use their own email address and
>> client of choice. Medical, law enforcement, volunteers, emergency room
>> personnel, etc are typical users.
>>
>> The problem is how to encrypt the data from start point to end point
>> (Sender to Recipient):
>>
>> a) *without* installing encryption at the Sender's machine.
>> b) with installing encryption at the Sender/Recipient's machine yet the
>> program encrypts and decrypts automatically with no user interaction and
>> invisibly (to the typical user).
>>
>> The users have resisted PGP, closed system emailing and any other type of
>> active participation, in short, they want security without any
>> appreciable
>> effort.
>>
>> Comments appreciated. Advise going to a non profit.
>>
>
> I want my truck to run on carrot juice and get 400 miles to the gallon,
> but I don't want to alter it at all nor have to go to a different gas
> station.
LOL
--
LTP
:)
Received on Sat Dec 3 04:20:18 2005