Re: Java encryption implementation

Ok, I've probably tripped myslelf up through a dodgy understanding of
"random". I'll go back and cogitate.

But I still believe that my reply to the OP contained at least some
truth! The OP seemed to be saying, that his new version of his RNG had
a very long cycle, so it should be ok for crypto. I just quoted a silly
generator which clearly had an enormously long cycle, but just as
clearly would not be any good for crypto. Do you at least agree with
that?

Cheers,
TC
Received on Sat Dec 3 04:20:22 2005