![]() |
Available news archives:
comp.lang.tcl
-
comp.lang.python
-
comp.security.firewalls
-
sci.crypt -
comp.lang.php -
comp.lang.javascript
|
|
sci.crypt archiveRe: AES operation order
From: Cryptic <no@spam.please>
Date: Mon Dec 26 2005 - 23:32:54 CET
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> I still wonder why you even assumed that '*' is distributive over XOR
To end this uncertainity:
for(int i = 0; i < 256; ++i)
It is distributive and then my modification is also correct.
Thank for your responses, Tomek
|